deposition transcript: 1616630
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
Summary
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: A-5825
The deponent, a lawyer, testifies about representing Craig Brubaker and discusses a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, regarding jury instructions. The deponent also recounts a conversation with opposing counsel Susan Brune about Conrad.
deposition transcript: A-5816
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, who represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse. Schoeman discusses his involvement in the trial and the role of his partner Barry Berke. He is questioned about a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, read aloud by the Court on May 11, 2011.
Court Filing - Index of Trial Documents: 11-cr-00383
This document is an index of trial documents from a criminal case (United States v. David Parse, et al.). It lists various documents, including trial transcripts, letters, emails, and exhibits. The documents are related to the trial proceedings, jury charge discussions, and evidence presented.
deposition transcript: A-5793
The deponent discusses receiving a letter from Catherine Conrad and their subsequent conversation with Susan Brune about it. The letter revealed information about jury deliberations, disturbing the deponent. The deponent discussed the Appellate Division order with Susan Brune but not the Westlaw report.
1.3S Financial Services Inc
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01276055
court transcript: 6168/20
The transcript captures a court hearing where the prosecutor, Ms. Davis, argues that the defense made a strategic decision not to disclose information about a juror, and that this decision cannot form the basis of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The government also presents evidence of the defendant's involvement in the alleged crimes, highlighting his role in orchestrating complex transactions.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.