Court Filing: A-5840
Summary
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York denied Catherine M. Conrad's request for immediate reinstatement to the practice of law, citing her acknowledged alcohol dependence. The court ruled that Conrad must prove her fitness to be reinstated through an evaluation, rather than relying on her own self-assessment.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Court Decision: A-5841
The court suspends attorney Catherine M. Conrad from practicing law due to her acknowledged alcohol dependency, denying her cross-motion for reinstatement without a mental health provider's evaluation attesting to her fitness. The decision vacates the prior finding of non-cooperation and grants the suspension based on medical disability.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
Court Transcript: 6162/20
The document is a transcript of the testimony of Brune, a witness, during a court proceeding. Brune discusses the pre-voir dire stage, the analysis of juror information, and the team's knowledge of Catherine Conrad's prior suspension. The transcript includes direct, cross, and redirect examinations.
Court Transcript: A-5634
The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a witness, due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. Conrad is expected to assert her Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.
court transcript: A-5635
The transcript records a court proceeding where the defendant's attorney explains that they are calling witness Catherine Conrad, for whom the government is seeking immunity. The court allows the witness to be examined, and the direct examination begins. The defendant's attorney clarifies that they would have called the witness regardless, to avoid any misimpression that the government selectively granted immunity.
deposition transcript: A-5721
The deposition transcript shows Brune being questioned about their actions during a trial, specifically regarding the discovery of information about a potential juror named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they did not immediately inform the court about the information and did not require anyone to explain its significance to them. The testimony highlights Brune's understanding of the potential significance of the information.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.