Catherine Morgan Conrad
Person who authored a note that became Court Exhibit 3
Mentioned in 60 documents. Roles: Person who authored a note that became Court Exhibit 3, Attorney involved in the case, suspended attorney in disciplinary proceedings, suspended attorney potentially connected to a juror, Juror No. 1 who sent a note to the court
Catherine Morgan Conrad is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Court Filing - Index of Trial Documents: 11-cr-00383
“This document is an index of trial documents from a criminal case (United States v. David Parse, et ”
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 120ec1-003308
“This document is a list of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration in a court case, including”
court transcript/deposition: 16163201
“The document contains excerpts from court proceedings, including a discussion on the suspension of a”
deposition transcript: 1616620
“The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant”
deposition transcript: 1616630
“The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respond”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 242 documents”
Known Connections (41)
Document Mentions (61)
Court Filing - Index of Trial Documents: 11-cr-00383
This document is an index of trial documents from a criminal case (United States v. David Parse, et al.). It lists various documents, including trial transcripts, letters, emails, and exhibits. The documents are related to the trial proceedings, jury charge discussions, and evidence presented.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 120ec1-003308
This document is a list of exhibits attached to the Trzaskoma Declaration in a court case, including documents related to Catherine M. Conrad's attorney registration, disciplinary history, marriage, and property records.
court transcript/deposition: 16163201
The document contains excerpts from court proceedings, including a discussion on the suspension of an attorney due to alcohol dependence and a separate discussion on tax implications of a brokerage error involving stock transactions.
deposition transcript: 1616620
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant, conversations about a juror's identity, and the team's response to new information about the juror. The testimony reveals details about the team's actions and potential inconsistencies in their statements.
deposition transcript: 1616630
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of certain facts and the drafting of a legal brief. They discuss their understanding of events and the reasoning behind the wording used in the brief. The testimony highlights potential discrepancies in interpretation and the context in which the brief was written.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 85 of 130
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a Westlaw report concerning a juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness confirms that the report matches the juror's information provided to the firm before voir dire.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-00338-PAE
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where she is questioned about her previous statements and actions as a juror, and initially invokes her Fifth Amendment privilege before being granted use immunity.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1
This document is an exhibit list from a court filing in Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE, referencing various documents from the Conrad v. Manessis case, including trial testimony, verdict, and post-trial motions. The exhibits include affirmations, affidavits, and other records related to the case. The list provides a catalog of documents submitted as evidence or used in the proceedings.
deposition: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 73 of 117
Mr. Schoeman testifies that he didn't know if more information would have helped his analysis of Juror No. 1's identity, but agrees that sharing a middle initial with another person of the same name makes it statistically more likely they are the same person.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03303
The deposition transcript discusses the authenticity of a juror's identity and the intent behind a court brief's wording. The witness explains that the brief's detail was necessary to establish the juror's identity and denies that the intent was to create a false impression. The questioning highlights a potential misinterpretation of the brief's content.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308-PAE Document 61602 Filed 02/24/22 Page 119 of 130
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.
Deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03339
The deposition transcript discusses the investigation into Juror No. 1's identity and the use of a Westlaw report. The witness confirms they had resources to investigate further but chose not to, and later called Nardello to assist in gathering information after receiving a juror letter.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03363-PAE
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
Showing 15 of 61 documents. View all →
This dossier on Catherine Morgan Conrad was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.