Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-23693133Court Unsealed

Lawsuit against Miami city attorney

Date
March 1, 2023
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-23693133
Pages
24
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

City Attorney Victoria Mendez and her husband are accused of deceiving a Little Havana homeowner in order to buy and flip a house with code violations.

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
AXS Law Group PLLC 1 | Page IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JOSE R. ALVAREZ, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. THE CITY OF MIAMI, VICTORIA MENDEZ, CARLOS MORALES, and EXPRESS HOMES, INC. Defendants. _______________________________/ COMPLAINT Jose R. Alvarez hereby sues the City of Miami, the City Attorney Victoria Mendez, her husband Carlos Morales, and Morales’s company Express Homes Inc. and alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION The City of Miami, through the City Attorney, her subordinates, Code Compliance Officers, and the Code Enforcement Board, among others, is engaged in a conspiratorial scheme to enrich the City Attorney and her husband, Carlos Morales. The City is enforcing code violations and related fines and penalties against City residents, but not enforcing those same laws and fines against the City Attorney’s husband and his company when they purchase the properties in question at steep discounts from elderly residents who are incapable of dealing with the City bureaucracy, remodeling the properties without permits, having false affidavits of compliance filed, having all violations cleared by the Code Enforcement Board, and reselling the properties quickly (hence the name “Express Homes”). Morales has earned millions of dollars in profits while depriving the City of associated revenue for the never-obtained permits and the never-paid fines, Filing # 167757813 E-Filed 02/28/2023 11:27:27 PM AXS Law Group PLLC 2 | Page while at the same time endangering the purchasers of those homes who lack the protections of a properly permitted and inspected home. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff Alvarez is a resident of Sumter County, Florida. At the time of the events at issue, he was a resident of Miami Dade County, Florida. 2. Defendant Victoria Mendez is the City Attorney for the City of Miami a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida. 3. Defendant City of Miami is a municipal city entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida. 4. Defendant Carlos Morales is the husband of the City Attorney and a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida. 5. Defendant Express Homes Inc. is a Florida Limited Liability Corporation owned by Defendant Carlos Morales. 6. This Court has jurisdiction as all the acts at issue occurred in Florida and the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees, is in excess of 15,000. 7. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 47.011 because the acts at issue occurred in Miami-Dade County, Florida and all actions that support Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in Miami-Dade County, Florida. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8. Plaintiff’s mother, Humiliana Alvarez, was a Cuban immigrant who purchased a home at 900 NW 30th Avenue, Miami (the “Alvarez Home”) and raised her children there. 9. After a long illness during which she did not live in the home, Plaintiff’s mother passed away in January 2017, leaving the Alvarez Home to Plaintiff and his brother. AXS Law Group PLLC 3 | Page 10. At that time, the Alvarez Home had received a code violation and related fines from the Code Enforcement Board for having an extra wall built inside the home for purposes of renting it to a tenant, but which had not been properly permitted. 11. In an effort to learn how best to address the violations so that he could keep the home that had been in his family for over 50 years, Alvarez eventually contacted the City Attorney, Victoria Mendez. 12. Under the guise of assisting Alvarez with his desperate situation as a disinterested public official, the City Attorney scheduled a phone call with Alverez and during that phone call referred Alvarez to her husband, Carlos Morales. 13. Morales represented that the value of the Alvarez Home was substantially diminished due to the code violations and related fines and penalties, and that—in addition to those fines and penalties—Alvarez would also have to spend an inordinate amount of money on professional fees for permitting, architecture, engineering, and construction to remediate the violations necessary to retain the Alvarez Home. Thus, according to Morales, Alvarez’s only hope was to sell the home to Morales at the below market price of $205,000. 14. As Morales demonstrated after he purchased the Alvarez Home, none of those representations were true, as it was only necessary for Morales to obtain a single construction permit (for approximately $60) and make a single one-minute presentation before all violations, fines, and penalties were waived. 15. Through his company, Express Homes, Morales is in the business of buying homes with code violations, remodeling them without permits, and then leveraging the authority and political connections of his wife (the City Attorney) to get the penalties waived so they can be promptly sold for a profit. AXS Law Group PLLC 4 | Page 16. Based on Morales’s misrepresentations that reasonably induced him to believe that he lacked any other viable option, Alvarez agreed to sell the home his mother had lived in for over 50 years. 17. Because the referral to Morales came from the seemingly reputable City Attorney and because his mother had passed away only two months earlier, Alvarez was particularly susceptible to Morales’s misrepresentations. 18. Although Morales had induced Alvarez to sell the home by representing that it would be necessary to pay staggering fines for construction work that had been done without permits, Morales proceeded to do even more work without obtaining the proper permits. 19. In fact, Morales only took out one permit, which authorized him only to renovate the windows and doors at the property. This permit cost Morales a mere $61.05. See Exhibit 1. 20. All of remaining construction work – i.e., completely remodeling the inside of the house, including new electrical appliances, new floors, new bathroom tiles and fixtures – was completed illegally without permits. 21. And, although fixing the previous additions to the Alvarez home would have itself required a permit, no such permit was obtained before modifying those previous additions. 22. Finally, an enormous tree was removed from the front yard, again without a permit. 23. On June 10, 2018, Morales caused the Alvarez Home to be listed for resale, emphasizing that it had been “completely renovated”: Beautiful 4/3 completely renovated New Impact windows, Flooring throughout, New bathrooms tiles/fixtures, Custom Kitchen cabinets with Quartz, SS Appliances. This property has endless possibilities !!!! See Exhibit 2 (MLS Listing).1 1 https://www.redfin.com/FL/Miami/900-NW-30th-Ave-33125/home/42718156 AXS Law Group PLLC 5 | Page 24. The listing also contained photos of the newly completed work. For example, for the “Custom Kitchen cabinets with Quartz, SS Appliances” it had the following photo: 25. For the “New bathrooms tiles/fixtures,” it had the following photos: 26. All of these renovations required a permit, but no permits were obtained. 27. Instead of issuing additional citations for the many new code violations that occurred due to the extensive work done without permits by Morales, a City Code Enforcement Officer issued an Affidavit of Compliance (“AFC”), stating that the property was clear of all prior violations. AXS Law Group PLLC 6 | Page 28. Obtaining an Affidavit of Compliance is ordinarily a time-consuming process that requires a homeowner to submit a work plan and obtain multiple permits for the planned work from the City Building Department before applying to the Code Enforcement Officer for an Affidavit of Compliance when those permits are eventually closed. Notably, a permit is not only required to perform new construction, but also any work done to fix prior violations. In other words, a violation incurred for work done without a permit cannot be cured by unilaterally undoing the work; rather, it is necessary to obtain a permit to undo the work resulting in the violation. Only after all of the work—both new construction and construction to remediate past violations—is completed and finalized will the building department close out all of the relevant permits. And then, only after the building department issues new permits for the work and closes all of the new permits, is it ordinarily possible for the homeowner to request and obtain an Affidavit of Compliance from the Code Enforcement Officer. 29. In this case, however, Morales did none of that. For instance, the Building Department neither issued any permits nor closed out any permits for any work, other than a single permit for windows and doors. Yet the same Code Enforcement Officer who had opened the original violations merely issued an Affidavit of Compliance knowing no permits (other than for windows and doors) had been either issued or closed. 30. Thus, the same Code Enforcement Officer who had been addressing the violations from the outset knew—or should have known—about all of the extensive remodeling that had been performed at the Alvarez Home. And that same Code Enforcement Officer knew—or should have known—that no permits had been issued or closed for virtually all of the construction work that had been done, representing entirely new violations. AXS Law Group PLLC 7 | Page 31. Even with the (false) Affidavit of Compliance, however, the Alvarez Home was subject to more than $271,000 in past fines and penalties. 32. Ordinarily, it would be necessary for a homeowner to schedule a hearing weeks in advance in order to seek mitigation of those fines and penalties. But Morales did not follow those ordinary procedures. 33. Instead, on July 19, 2018, at 11:15 a.m., Morales sent an email to several recipients, including an Assistant City Attorney in the City’s Real Estate and Compliance Division that handles code enforcement issues, who reports to his wife (City Attorney Victoria Mendez). In addition, Morales copied Commissioner Joe Carollo, his Chief of Staff (Richard Blom), and his Deputy Chief of Staff (Anthony Barcena), despite the fact that the property is not in Commissioner Carollo’s district. 34. Notably absent from the email chain was Commissioner Alex Diaz de la Portilla, whose district the Alvarez Home was in, or anyone from Mr. de la Portilla’s staff. 35. The email stated: I am sorry to bother you but I need your help. I have a closing scheduled for the end of next week to sell the above referenced property. I need to get on the code enforcement board calendar for mitigation. I was informed the next available hearing is September or October because there are no more special master calendars. My closing will not occur if I cannot address the lien causing me serious financial loss. Please help me get on one of those July existing calendars by adding a supplemental agenda to one of those dates to address my case and any other backlog. I would appreciate it. It has been done in past administrations when necessary. Thank you so much. Carlos Morales See Exhibit 3. 36. The Assistant City Attorney (who reports to Morales’ wife, City Attorney Victoria Mendez) quickly addressed Morales’s request and, that very same day, added the item to the AXS Law Group PLLC 8 | Page agenda for the meeting scheduled only six days later. See Exhibit 4 (City’s Code Enforcement Fact sheet for July 19, 2018: “7/19/2018: Added for Mitigation per A[ssistant] C[ity] A[ttorney]”). 37. On July 25, 2018, six days later, Morales appeared at the code enforcement meeting. On the video, the Assistant City Attorney who reports to Morales’s wife can be seen hand delivering the case to the Code Enforcement Board. 38. Morales then addresses the board, under oath, stating that he had purchased the property last year from an owner and the house had an illegal unit, and asks the City to mitigate the property. 39. Specifically, the following exchange occurred between Morales and the Code Enforcement Board2 : Morales: I am Carlos Morales, President of Express Homes and I am not an attorney. (Unidentified City Personnel): He does have standing. Morales: I’m married to one. I bought the property last year from a gentleman Joe Alvarez. At the time, he was dealing with the violation. He was not aware of how to cure these violations. I knew the property was cited, I felt, incorrectly because it was under his mom’s name. And his mom had been incapacitated for in a home for about 10 years. So I felt that I could -- Board: What did you say about his mom? Morales: His mom had been incapacitated over 10 years. She passed last January. It’s been complied. We have fixed the property up and we are ready for sale. My attorney tells me hey, by the way, did you ever resolve that lien? I was like … no. So here I am now. Board: Yes. I mean? What was the work you had to do? 2 This video can be accessed at: http://miamifl.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=2128 Carlos Morales appears at minute 45 of the video. AXS Law Group PLLC 9 | Page Morales: No it was just apparently, um, he had a tenant that had rented a section of the house out as an illegal unit. There was an illegal unit in the house, it wasn’t built out or anything just within the house. And I told him bro, to sell it, to fix you have to .. and before I bought it he moved everything out. It’s been empty for two years and here we are now. Board: Somebody said we had the Santa Claus suit on. So, I will keep it on in your motion for $0. Second. There’s a motion and second to $0 all in favor say aye. Aye. Wait for the order. 40. The City waived $271,250.00 in fines for the property now owned by the City Attorney’s husband after a one-minute explanation. 41. Thus, Morales paid only $61.05 in permitting fees to address the Code Violations that he had falsely represented to Alverez would take hundreds of thousands of dollars to address 42. Moreover, the Affidavit of Compliance on this property was issued even before the permit for windows and doors renovations had been closed. The document that certifies the work was completed for the windows is dated August 8, 2018 – 14 days after the Code Enforcement Board Meeting. 43. Normally, no Affidavit of Completion could be issued without the $61 window permit being closed. 44. Morales then sold the property on August 20, 2018, for $370,000. This was $165,000 dollars over what he bought the home for from Alvarez. 45. Due to the lack of permits and incognito work Morales completed, he paid a fraction of that price difference to fix up the home. 46. Upon information and belief, Morales, Express Homes, Mendez and the City of Miami have repeated these actions to assist Morales in profiting from the purchase, remodeling without permits, and waiving of code violation fines and penalties on many other properties in the City. AXS Law Group PLLC 10 | Page COUNT I FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT FLORIDA STATUTE § 501.201, ET SEQ. (Against Mendez, Morales and Express Homes) 47. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 46 above. 48. Morales and Express Homes engaged in a deceptive act when they represented to Mr. Alvarez that his home would be very hard to mitigate with the City when Defendants knew or should have known that through his connections the City would mitigate the property down to $0 for him quickly. 49. Victoria Mendez engaged in a deceptive act when she recommended her husband’s services to Alvarez, a taxpayer of the City of Miami, instead of recommending the appropriate City official that could help with code violations, when she knew or should have known that she would personally benefit from the sale and her husband would use her position to mitigate the property. 50. It was reasonable for Plaintiff to rely on Defendants’ affirmations given that the City Attorney, Victoria Mendez, who would have vast knowledge on how the Code Enforcement Board operates, had recommended Morales to Plaintiff. 51. These deceptive acts directly caused Mr. Alvarez to sell his home well below the market value to Morales. 52. Mr. Alvarez suffered a financial loss that was directly caused by Morales’ and Mendez’s deceptive acts. COUNT II FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT (Against Morales and Express Homes) 53. Plaintiff incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 46 above. AXS Law Group PLLC 11 | Page 54. Morales intentionally made false statements to Alvarez regarding how hard the code violations were to fix and how they significantly lowered the market value of the property. 55. Morales knew these statements were false when made, because he knew that he would be able to fix the code violations without permits and then enlist the City to mitigate the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines to zero based upon his wife being the City Attorney. 56. Morales intended for Alvarez to rely on his false statements, so that he could purchase the home and make a profit. 57. Alvarez did rely on those statements and sold his family home to Morales for a mere $205,000. 58. Morales’ false statements caused a financial loss to Alvarez. COUNT III CIVIL CONSPIRACY (against all Defendants) 59. Morales, Mendez, and the City of Miami conspired to defraud Alvarez out of his family home. 60. Mendez assisted in the fraud by, in her official capacity as City Attorney, outwardly recommending her husband’s services instead of providing a city resource to Alvarez when asked about how to proceed with trying to fix the code violations. 61. Morales then acted on that recommendation and made misrepresentations to Alvarez about how difficult it would be for him to fix the code violations and the significant amount of money that it would cost. 62. The City of Miami, its officials, the City Attorney Victoria Mendez, and her subordinates have all conspired with Morales and Express Homes to deprive the citizens of Miami of safety, permit fees, code violation fines and penalties, all to enrich Mendez and Morales. AXS Law Group PLLC 12 | Page 63. Alvarez suffered harm from this conspiracy, as he was defrauded of the true value of the home. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment against the City of Miami, Victoria Mendez, Carlos Morales and Express Homes for all damages cause as well as award Plaintiff his legal fees. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. February 28, 2023 Respectfully submitted, AXS Law Group, PLLC 2121 NW 2nd Ave, Suite 201 Miami, Florida 33127 Tel.: (305) 297-1878 By: /s/ Jeffrey W. Gutchess Jeffrey W. Gutchess, Esq. Florida Bar No. 702641 [email protected] Courtney Caprio Florida Bar No. 933961 [email protected] Amanda Suarez Florida Bar No. 1030808 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff     teak ES City of Miami BUILDING OEPARTHENT Permit Issuance Financial Transaction ID: 482730 LM Reference Number: BD18-001274-001-B001 Job Address: 900 NW 30 AV FEE SUMMARY Fee Category Fee Description Quanity [mt Type eas Fee pomustranive [1 so ons ree [reruication [| wo ooscomry _ Jcooecomumce | sew Joowms [ses BUILDING PERMIT [NEW CONSTRUCTION / ADDITION 1360000 |oows “e500 REMODELING - RESIDENTIAL (0.50%) pernIT MISC WINIHUH FEE ADIUSTHENT (I $3200 10000) [pemmrrmse Tenn - sci meaTion rate |” ooo fous | ses creorr vores TT] 1 swe) ro] sor0s Rev. Mar/09/2011 Generated on Feb/28/2018 11:01 AM * (CER) City or Miami Pins: _3D8-0012 TN ~a =O | ALTE) suing Deparmens Pemit# " ES vei Application Tout bu: 3 012.0 - ry Job Location | OwnerLesecloformation | [Folio Nomber: gue, | Owner: Prcpress Homes Te, (arfos Hagples [Job Adress: G00 NW, DOC Zip: 330 [Owner's Rddvess: 524) S,W. 4H Shradt, aod) Fla [WmiNe: —— — T TWesee [ Corctor information. = ~~ 1 General Information | Eo seem Se GEPBOT | Fm i usdng Ra Fiereta 1 EE a ET [Ousifier's Name: ETI DIA, om SA ee oT APT Pe rr ncaa (302 [Boma ini fg AT bane [Emu Sunal(SGoneat IEF [VainS/2 Foon 1 0 Name: Address: hone heme | fr Wermiype [ EnginceyArchigect Information | 0 Mechanical/AC 0 Plumbing Gas [Address 21809 SL. 97% AVE. Cilfer By Ot San [Obes Roofing | Address: pid | ChamctobustingPermic | Wen P00fodrBmitony | Cire Contig CR) Chane Goer C3 Ny on 0 Adi O Recertification of Pass (RC) O Pans revision (RY) | 04% Shae Wows. Buns Seiam reich, SEER. Rl ry) : Tr or hd ho se Kell ee ui i rr el Te Suet sieryety EE Ee SA Owner's Affidavit. | crify hat sil the forgoing information i correct. Of Bo. nip re] Booed Contractor has the: an aa ered ° Bw = if Lc dit Les contest coment se ho Dot sg tom ove punidiieobudirimin NE) it ppm ein EB mri “Con Morden IB Hts eel bE Lagles Moodles [eri¥ Daz! Sueof Florin. (PRO ge of Hots, JIE Sreth aos, nor ty cir. ve EQUBTD DIAZ Bea gash For Sg Uhr Shots riot 1 Jol de bp MSS: 3 MC (SER [ERA Jonze 20 LSS Wy Com, Ems un 2,205 Fo el ep ag laos Loma TT TTT TTT TTT] 5 TS — 7 stot Pome | 3° usu ABE onl JRE] 3     was, os tc Fiorina (Dwep EBRosuns. rs Not 301 Choad ore eG out apr vn 1 poe © 900 NW 30th Avenue, Miarmi, FL 33125-2929 ®@ clos osz0z01e LastListng 2@0 csem.i = ©UAs ages @ © someraty re fg. XY HE es we pmo — ur Status: Closes Sut Eon BL for TP. -_ fn (Son i” _—_ ES pesos noun EE 0 SE aon —— am Te sabe 0 Eo EAE ese ne ee Locton tomato or soos sesame Blur Bir ¥ a. i — EE fr fina ee: cama Dp rns EE ory rom SAE ont pt water od [R—— 22 Jr Er Ein ore LotDesc Less Than 1/6 Acre Lot inter aconse: Ei we om Boe Soames EEE EEE re svete ron Octo: 0k St Aken eo nh a ee emt ot bt oman tf oon oy AAD rt en eo J SEER se ato Fret fri Addons Information He 5 ae Sar, EE py war ok, fcr eet sc cin Beier Fast Fen lh mcs aes, Exar tng ute ERECT GLI EE am, So, TE pum sor Hesse BE fo ——— Ri rin norman Jem sa rn EE HEE wom coe Nosh naa 385 AEA AAA RACHA GAA AGAAMAGICALSMANAAGNCEAAAALSS.. 12 ons 00s ac RR. sre TER Imo gas re 200 Owner Agent: No. Eli, BE £2 ste enn: En ES htwona mn me pms [rr FL HEL OBESE © Mam, A312 sn SEE ten: in Ei craves Buy Age Comp: 3% “Trans Bk Comp: 3% NonRep Cpr 3% HEE Te Bae EEE re Bugone SEE ome fen RE cn HE. ETI, Sn UstDate: © 06/10/2018 Stat Change Dt: 08/29/2018 Previp: 430.000 BER DEE wen gE oB= Sotelor’ Ghaia0ns Bodamon dos winam oe Intent Ree: SEA sma uta No Sate tows sg ssa as Detrich Coron a TT sotomaton sons i prrre EERE SAS nn RIAD Ferny ERAS ERR a Hie Ea over Guts or ns sn sn o 5 roo wns AS est rt oe AAA AAA AGAMA NMAG ANAS EAA... 22 eas ose te Scam vn Wn Previous Next 1of1 Checked® All-Nene: Page Tox Grid display Display 360 Property View v at 1 v perpage © 900 NW 30th Avenue, Miami, FL 33125-2929 @ Ciosed 0812072018 ros nny : ww = 4 L L = iL | “I ll 17 . - - : 3 = ER pn TT p= ~ i = | Mik ° TTT lm EA AAACN EAACAA AN ASAAANSS.. 1 waar, oom ae Fedora (wap EB Rosuns. Previous Net 1of1 Checked® All-None: Page Tox Grd display Display 360 Property View v at 1 v perpage © 900 NW 30th Avenue, Miami, FL 33125-2929 @ closed 08202018 sory Listing istry from MLS an sas guns rey ar a gyn Wow mp mo om . oe 7 Gio [or ETE Gams ER = Za fhmogme Lois ms 3 ZEW means SEmiEE Sate History rom Public Records So Say pe vm ae) Guy Nn pore Tory et Sd REE BSR Sim cory am cao gprs Arman rs sey nr on a so— a" —o wr wv nen won oy = Mortgage History STTS00 MY sy ve om te ers re nn win GE vo i — Sy pa ur 12 es oA vm Wh tome RE = ow 0 ran ws     Ea osc; occa oom: a Som; [email protected]; campeny@izmiooycom; th 2 Gong next week. Nec code enforcement hor for mtgation ASAP S60 NW 30 Ave Ho Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:15:57 AM 0 bother you bt need you hel. have closing scheduled or the nd of net week sel hea property. | nced to get onthe cod forcement bord calendar for miigaion. was informed he hearing is September or October because hire aro more sora master calendars. My closing il ;annot address the lien causing me serious financial los. Please help me get on one of those July ex adding a supplemental agenda to one of those dates 0 address my case ahd any other backlog 3 thas been done in past administrations when necessary. Thank you so much. E 3 y b i —————————     (KiP q   q q93q =MSPOkYPq(KiP q :d_`Pgjpq%OOdPhhq ,_YT_ q 'KhPq=iKilhq 0^TiTKYq0^haPMiU_^q    q  q  q%Dq    q     q 'Tipq_Qq3TK\Tq '_OPq)^Q_cMP\P^iq +KMiq=SPPiq 'KhPq5_q 5)? q 0^h`PNi_e q &_KdOq 9fT]KdpqJ_^T^R q 2PRKZ!q |||"6:%1|!$74|8"|  9Pdq(UP\ q |16<||"1/||16<|;,B%| ;,<%|@!1>%| %hhPhhPOqDKYlPq  q 9Pdq(UP\q?_iKY q 7n^Pcq .C4020%6%q%2D%<)Jq)G9<)==q 7mPdYKpq "q .74)=q06'q 4KTYT^Rq%OOcPhh q 7mPdYKpqq  q >Eqq %D*q 8mPdYKpqq  +2q  q ._]PhiPKOq)oP\aiq 2Khiq =KYPq(KiPq AWMXPiq5k]LPcq <P`PKiqDT_ZKi_dq     :KRP q (0=?<0'@q q ')   q  <0'%<(7q+<%6;B1q ')&q < q =T^RZP+K\TYp <PhUOP^iUKY   q   q  q   q 57q q .PKdU^Rq .PKdU^Rq@p`Pq .PKdU^Rq<PbkPhiq /PKcT^Rq<PhkZiq '_\]P^iq q    q')&=q q  q')&q   :HJ | $HqEiOesOda| ')q=`PNUK[q 3KhiPdq ')q&_KcOq -kTYipq 4UiURKiT_^q   q q q(%H=q@7q '73:[email protected] q9(q    q%OOPOqQ_cq \TiTRKiU_^q`Pcq%'%q(__ZPpq ;rCsvq| $CsH|#d`eXOHF|  | A6:0|8%:'6:2%$|A-<*6><|!|(,4!1,B%$|9%:2 < #d`eXOIF|  | | ,XXIMCY|vaPsq| #d`eXOIF|   |     %OOPOqQ_cq \TiTRKiU_^ `Pc %'%q(__ZPp

Related Documents (6)

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.