Case File
dc-3458121Court Unsealed16458461
Date
February 10, 2017
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-3458121
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
Anchorage Police Department Operational Procedures Regulations and Procedures Manual 2.04.010 Policy and Procedure Title Effective Date Internal Investigation/Discipline 9/12/2016 Page 1of 6 Replaces Prior Policy: Approved by: 2/24/2013 Chief Christopher Tolley This Policy is for departmental use only and does not apply in any criminal or civil proceeding. This Policy should not be construed as creation of a higher legal standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense with respec
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Anchorage Police Department
Operational Procedures
Regulations and Procedures Manual
2.04.010
Policy and Procedure Title
Effective Date
Internal Investigation/Discipline
9/12/2016
Page 1of 6
Replaces Prior Policy:
Approved by:
2/24/2013
Chief Christopher Tolley
This Policy is for departmental use only and does not apply in any criminal
or civil proceeding. This Policy should not be construed as creation of a
higher legal standard of safety or care in an evidentiary sense with respect
to third party claims. Violations of this Policy will only form the basis for
departmental administrative sanctions. Violations of law will form the basis
for civil and criminal sanctions in a recognized judicial setting.
2.04.010 Internal Investigation/Discipline
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to inform all employees of procedures governing
disciplinary and corrective action.
POLICY
This policy is designed to provide a fair and just means for appropriate action
when an employee's conduct reflects unfavorably on the department's ability to
provide service or is detrimental to effective and efficient operations. It is the
department's policy to impose corrective and disciplinary action fairly and
impartially and to offer adequate appeal procedures to ensure that the rights of
employees are protected.
DEFINITIONS
Corrective Action: Any remedial action taken by the Department in regards to
an employee. Corrective action is not discipline. Corrective action includes:
A. Formal Counseling.
B. Education/Training.
C. Medical Evaluation/Screening.
D. Psychological Evaluation/Screening.
E. Transfer (involuntary and non-disciplinary for the good of the employee or
the Department).
F. Special Evaluation.
Disciplinary Action: An action taken against any employee of the Department
for a violation of policy, procedure, or law where formal discipline is imposed.
With the exception of an oral reprimand, disciplinary action is documented on a
Disciplinary Action Report (DAR) signed by both, the Chief of Police and the
Director of Labor Relations, and entered in the employee’s personnel file.
Disciplinary actions include:
A. Oral Reprimands: An oral admonishment given to an employee by a
Supervisor which meets both the following standards:
1. The admonishment must be identified to the employee as an oral
reprimand.
2. The admonishment does not appear on a DAR. The reprimand will be
documented in IA Pro.
B. Written Reprimands: A written admonishment given to an employee by a
commander which meets the following standards:
1. The admonishment must be identified to the employee as a written
reprimand.
2. The admonishment appears on a DAR.
C. Suspension from Duty (without pay).
D. Suspension of Privileges (e.g., home car, building access, use of
facilities, etc.).
E. Transfer (disciplinary- either from shift or job assignment).
F. Demotion in Rank.
G. Termination of Employment.
Findings: Findings are the results of the investigation. There are four possible
findings:
1. Sustained: where the investigation determines, by preponderance
of the evidence, the complainant’s allegation is supported by
sufficient evidence to determine the incident occurred and the
actions of the Officer were improper.
2. Not sustained: where the investigation determines, by
preponderance of the evidence, there are insufficient facts to
decide whether the alleged misconduct occurred.
3. Exonerated: where the investigation determines, by
preponderance of the evidence, the alleged conduct did occur but
did not violate APD policies, procedures, or training; or the conduct
was outside of policy but no misconduct occurred.
4. Unfounded: where the investigation determines, by
preponderance of the evidence, there are no facts to support the
incident complained of actually occurred.
Administrative Review Board. A panel that reviews, assesses, and
recommends action on events assigned to it. The Board shall normally hear
matters of alleged regulation violations that could result in discipline of
8e8fb6d0-8ebe-452d-9a3d-c61addfed950.doc
2
suspension or greater. (See Administrative Policy: Administrative Review Board
Policy)
Progressive Discipline: Under normal circumstances, discipline shall be
imposed in a progressive manner in an attempt to influence the employee to
correct behavior. Discipline can progress incrementally from the lowest to the
highest level; be reversed if infractions show improvement over previous
infractions; and, depending on circumstances, steps can be skipped, particularly
if the offense creates a serious result or liability for the Department. Each case
will be reviewed on a case-by-case analysis. The steps of the progressive
discipline system consist of oral reprimand, written reprimand, suspension and
termination. All steps related to progressive discipline must be documented.
Violation: A sustained complaint of an act or omission contrary to any
regulation, policy, or procedure. A violation can subject the employee to any
disciplinary or corrective action identified in this procedure.
PROCEDURE
I. DISPOSITION OF COMPLAINTS
A. When an internal investigation is completed, the supervisor will submit the
investigation to the unit or shift commander for review without a finding.
The commander will review the investigation in Blue Team. The
commander has the option of returning the investigation to the supervisor
for additional explanation or follow-up or attach a findings memo. The
commander will then make a recommendation of corrective or disciplinary
action, if warranted, up the chain of command.
1. Commanders should consider the following for corrective action to
apply:
a) The seriousness of the offense as it relates to the nature and extent
of potential or actual damage or liability to the Department.
b) To ensure consistency to other employees to prevent similar
infractions or to ensure that similar infractions will not occur or be
tolerated.
c) The employee's attitude about acknowledging doing wrong and
making a commitment to improve; this includes the employee's
cooperation in the investigation and resolution processes.
d) The employee's previous disciplinary and performance records
including, but not limited to: time between other offenses, the
nature of other offenses, work productivity, attendance rates, cost
of supervision, and types of performance errors.
B. If the commander recommends discipline then the following procedure will
be followed:
1. All disciplinary recommendations, except an oral reprimand, will be
documented on a Disciplinary Action Report (DAR) and shall be
8e8fb6d0-8ebe-452d-9a3d-c61addfed950.doc
3
forwarded to the Chief of Police through the chain of command for
information, review and comment.
2. The Chief of Police will review the investigative report and supporting
documents and may accept the findings and recommendations, change
the findings and/or recommendations, or remand the case for additional
investigation, as a whole or in part.
3. The Chief of Police has the final determination if the complaint is
sustained, not sustained, exonerated, or unfounded.
4. If the Chief of Police’s findings concur with the recommended findings:
a) A sustained case would follow the process described below in
section “II. DISPOSING OF SUSTAINED COMPLAINTS”.
b) The findings will be forwarded to The Office of Professional
Responsibility (OPR) for filing of the case.
5. If the Chief of Police does not concur with the recommended finding,
the Chief of Police will provide a cover memo outlining the reason for
their finding. The Findings Memo will be forwarded to OPR for filing.
II. DISPOSING OF SUSTAINED COMPLAINTS
A. General. This section details how the Department shall handle sustained
complaints. In disposing of complaints, the Department shall be guided by
good management practices and fundamental fairness.
B. The Department has 45 calendar days from the time the Unit Commander
submits their findings to make a determination on discipline as outlined in
the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
1. The Unit Commander will fill out a draft DAR and forward it to the
Division Captain and Employee Relations for approval.
2. Once the draft DAR is approved, the Unit Commander will notify the
employee and APDEA of the recommended discipline and serve the
draft DAR.
a) The employee will initial receipt of the finding and have up to three
days to determine a response.
(1) The employee may request an administrative hearing (when
the discipline is suspension or higher) or to write a rebuttal.
(2) If the employee elects to accept the discipline, the employee
can sign the final DAR.
(3) If the employee takes advantage of the three days but
ultimately accepts the discipline, the Unit Commander will have
the employee sign the DAR after the three day time frame.
b) Employees electing or declining a pre-disciplinary hearing
(Loudermill) will indicate their intent by completing a Loudermill
Memo found on the APD Only Forms page.
8e8fb6d0-8ebe-452d-9a3d-c61addfed950.doc
4
(1) If the employee requests a pre-disciplinary hearing the DAR will
not be signed and a hearing will be scheduled in a reasonable
period of time.
(2) If the employee declines a pre-disciplinary hearing the final
DAR will be signed.
3. All accepted discipline will be signed by the employee, the Division
Captain, Employee Relations, and the Chief of Police.
C. The Administrative Review Board reviews and assesses certain cases on
behalf of the Chief of Police per APD Operational Procedure 2.04.015. If
the ARB has a recommendation of discipline the following will apply:
1. Command Review. When the Administrative Review Board
recommends discipline of a two week unpaid suspension or higher,
including termination, the Chief of Police will meet with senior command
staff, a member of City Employee Relations, and the Administrative
Review Board to discuss the Board’s recommendation prior to the
Chief’s determination of discipline.
2. Concluding the Disposition. Once an action is decided upon, the matter
is concluded by:
a) Completing a memo for the OPR file, setting out the reasoning and
describing the action to be taken;
b) Serving the Disciplinary Action Report on the employee;
c) Ensuring and recording with OPR an expeditious implementation of
the prescribed sanction; and
d) Returning the investigation documentation to OPR for notification to
the complainant and filing of the investigative report.
3. If it is anticipated discipline will not be meted out within 45 days from
the completion of the investigation, the Division shall advise the
Inspection Division Captain within one week of the due date. The
request shall indicate what remains to be done, an estimated time for
completion and the extenuating circumstances causing the delay. The
Inspection Division Captain will notify the APDEA of the delay and
provide an expected completion date for the disciplinary sanction.
D. OPR will prepare a weekly report of the status of all pending
administrative investigations with the originally assigned due dates and
any new dates given. This report will be made available to all
commanding officers and the Chief of Police.
III. OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY RECORDS AND
CONFIDENTIALITY
A. The Office of Professional Responsibility shall be informed of all final
disciplinary decisions.
8e8fb6d0-8ebe-452d-9a3d-c61addfed950.doc
5
B. The Department’s central personnel office shall forward a copy of all final
DARs to the OPR.
C. OPR case files and information shall be maintained separately from other
personnel records.
D. Because they deal with personnel information, OPR files are considered
confidential personnel records and will be retained under secure
conditions within the OPR and in accordance with Municipal Code and the
current CBA.
1. OPR case files and personnel dispositions may not be released to any
source without prior approval of the Chief of Police unless otherwise
provided by law. Before releasing an OPR case file or personnel
disposition, the Department shall provide at least 48 hours notice, if
possible, to the employees who were the subject of and witnesses in
the investigation of the intent to release the file.
2. IAPRO files may be accessed or reviewed by supervisors and
commanders running the process during promotion, job transfer, or
special assignment selection.
3. Retention of IA Pro files. All complaints will remain in an employee’s IA
Pro file indefinitely.
***END OF DOCUMENT***
8e8fb6d0-8ebe-452d-9a3d-c61addfed950.doc
6
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.