Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-5000534Dept. of Justice

Epstein & Comitale indictment

Date
October 11, 2018
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
dc-5000534
Pages
9
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

.3110; STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY COURT 2 COUNTY OF RENSSELAER THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against? Indictment No. SP 1? i RONALD L. EPSTEIN and JOHN A. COMITALE, JR., Defendants. THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF RENSSELAER, by this indictment, accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of CRIMINAL MISCHIEF IN THE FOURTH DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?145.00, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defend

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
.3110; STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY COURT 2 COUNTY OF RENSSELAER THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against? Indictment No. SP 1? i RONALD L. EPSTEIN and JOHN A. COMITALE, JR., Defendants. THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF RENSSELAER, by this indictment, accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of CRIMINAL MISCHIEF IN THE FOURTH DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?145.00, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9?11 day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, having no right to do so nor any reasonable ground to believe that he had such right, intentionally damage property of another person, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, having no right to do so nor any reasonable ground to believe that he had such a right, intentionally damaged property of another person, an exterior door of 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York. AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, accuses the defendants, RONALD L. EPSTEIN and JOHN A. COMITALE, JR., with the commission of the crime of CRIMINAL TRESPASS IN THE SECOND DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?l40.15, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendants, in concert with one another, on or about the 9?h day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did knowingly and unlawfully enter or remain unlawfully in a dwelling, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendants entered and remained unlawfully in a dwelling at 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, second ?oor. AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendants, RONALD L. EPSTEIN and JOHN A. COMITALE, JR, with the commission of the crime of CRIMINAL FACILITATION IN THE SECOND DEGREE, a Class Felony, in violation of ?115.05, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendants, in concert with one another, on or about the day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, when believing it probable that they were rendering aid to a person who intends to commit a? class A felony, engaged in conduct which provided such person with means or opportunity for the commission thereof and which in fact aided such person to commit such class A felony, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendants, believing it probable that they were rendering aid to a person who had intended to commit the class A felony of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Second Degree, in violation of Penal Law after becoming aware of the existence of what they reasonably believed to be more than four (4) ounces of cocaine and, notwithstanding their ability to take possession of same, did leave the aforementioned cocaine to be possessed by another. I COUNT FOUR AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendants, RONALD L. EPSTEIN and JOHN A. COMITALE, JR., with the commission of the crime of CRIMINAL FACILITATION IN THE FOURTH DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?115.00, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendants, in concert with one another, on or about the 9'h day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, when believing it probable that they were rendering aid to a person who intends to commit a crime, engage in conduct which provided such person with means or opportunity for the commission thereof and which in fact aided such person to commit a felony, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendants, believing it probable that they were rendering aid to a person who had intended to commit the felony of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Fourth Degree, in violation of Penal Law after becoming aware of the existence of what they reasonably believed to be more than 1/8 ounce of cocaine and, notwithstanding their ability to take possession of same, did leave the aforementioned cocaine to be possessed by another. COUNT FIVE AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendants, RONALD L. EPSTEIN and JOHN A. COMITALE, JR., with the commission of the crime of OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?195.00, subdivision 2, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendants, on or about the 9?1 day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, with intent to obtain a bene?t or deprive another person of a bene?t, knowingly refrain from performing a duty which is imposed upon them by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of their of?ce, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendants, Police Of?cers of the Troy, New York, Police Department, in concert with one another, with intent to conceal their unauthorized and unlawful entry into 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, intentionally refrained from seizing and taking possession of what they reasonably believed to be cocaine, a duty imposed upon them by law and/or clearly inherent in the nature of their of?ce. COUNT SIX AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendants, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?195 .00, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, a public servant, on or about the day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did knowingly and unlawfully, and with intent to obtain a benefit or deprive another person of a bene?t, commit an act relating to his of?ce but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his of?cial functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, a Police Of?cer of the Troy, New York, Police Department, with the intent to conceal their unlawful and/or unauthorized entry into 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, and their failure to take possession of cocaine found therein, and in an attempt to dissuade other Police Of?cers from revealing same, did propose to them that they agree to falsely report that a burglary or attempted burglary had occurred, which burglary or attempted burglary prompted them to lawfully enter 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, when, in fact, defendant had entered said building without regard to any burglary or attempted burglary. COUNT SEVEN AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, a Class Felony, in violation of ?175.10 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9'11 day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, with intent to defraud, make or cause a false entry in the business records of an enterprise with the intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, a Police Of?cer of the Troy, New York, Peliee Department with intent to conceal his unauthorized and unlawful entry into 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, did make a false entry in a New York State Incident Report dated June 9, 2017 of the Troy Police Department, with the intent to conceal the commission of another crime, as follows: tried door knob to see if door was unlocked it was not. PR1 knocked on the door with hand and foot loudly to gain attention, door opened. The door seemed to open easly being locked. Further examination it appeared that the door had been previously damaged. announced our selves several times with no response. Residence was entered and cleared. No one was found present in residence. Mail found in residence showing the name Nicholas Thomas with above address. Attempts to contact Thomas were made through several sources, neg results. The fact that the door had opened easily without force a ET was called to the seen in case previous burglary had taken place and the tenant was unaware.? COUNT EIGHT AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE SECOND DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?175.05, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, with intent to defraud, make or cause a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, a Police Of?cer of the Troy, New York, Police Department with intent to conceal his unauthorized and unlawful entry into 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, did make a false entry in a New York State Incident Report dated June 9, 2017 of the Troy Police Department as follows: tried door knob to see if door was unlocked it was not. PR1 knocked on the door with hand and foot loudly to gain attention, door opened. The door seemed to open easly being locked. Further examination it appeared that the door had been previously damaged. announced our selves several times with no response. Residence was entered and cleared. No one was found present in residence. Mail found in residence showing the name Nicholas Thomas with above address. Attempts to contact Thomas were made through several sources, neg results. The fact that the door had opened easily without force a ET was 4n L. 1.74 4:1. 1.7 . ,1 . vuuvu LU my .3091: vaoc LdnC? dl?lU U16 tenant was unaware.? COUNT NINE AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN- THE FIRST DEGREE, a Class Felony, in violation of ?175.10 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9?1 day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did omit to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he knew to be imposed upon him by law or by the nature of his position with the intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, with intent to defraud, and in violation of a duty to do so which he knew to be imposed upon him by law or by the nature of his position as a Police Of?cer of the Troy, New York, Police Department, omitted to include in a New York State Incident Report, dated June 9, 2017, of the Troy Police Department, any reference to what he reasonably believed to be cocaine, which was found inside 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, with the intent to conceal the commission of another crime. germs AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE SECOND DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?175.05, subdivision 3, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9'11 day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did omit to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he knew to be imposed upon him by law or by the nature of his position, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, with intent to defraud, and in violation of a duty to do so which he knew to be imposed upon him by law or by the nature of his position as a Police Of?cer of the Troy, New York, Police Department, omitted to include in a New York State Incident Report, dated June 9, 2017, of the Troy Police Department, any reference to what he reasonably believed to be cocaine, which was found inside 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York. COUNT ELEVEN AND THE GRAND IURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE, a Class Felony, in violation of subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9th day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, knowing that a written instrument contained a false statement or false information, and with intent to defraud the state or any political subdivision, public authority, or public bene?t corporation of the state, offer or present it to a public of?ce, public servant, public authority, or public bene?t corporation with the knowledge or belief that it will be ?led with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of such public of?ce, public servant, public authority, or . public bene?t corporation, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, knowing that a New York State Incident Report contained a false statement or false information, and with the intent to de?'aud the Troy, New York Police Department, offered and presented it to the Troy, New York Police Department with the knowledge or belief that it would be ?led with and otherwise become a part of the records of said Troy Police Department. COUNT TWELVE AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission Of the crime of OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE SECOND DEGREE, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?l75.30 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9'h day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did, knowing that a written instrument contained a false statement or false information, offer or present it to a public of?ce or public servant with the knowledge or belief that it will be ?led with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of such public of?ce or public servant, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, knowing that a New York State Incident Report contained a false statement or false information, offered and presented it to the Troy, New York Police Department with the knowledge or belief that it would be ?led with and otherwise become a part of the records of said Troy Police Department. COUNT THIRTEEN AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of BRIBERY IN THE THIRD DEGREE, a Class Felony, in violation of ?200.00 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, on or about the 9th day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did confer, or offer or agree to confer, any bene?t upon a public servant upon an agreement or understanding that such public servant?s vote, opinion, judgment, action, decision, or exercise of discretion as a public servant will thereby be in?uenced, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant did offer or agree to confer overtime bene?ts upon another Police Of?cer, Upon agreement or understanding that such Police Of?cer?s action would thereby be in?uenced. COUNT FOURTEEN AND THE GRAND JURY aforesaid, by this indictment, further accuses the defendant, RONALD L. EPSTEIN, with the commission of the crime of OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT, a Class A Misdemeanor, in violation of ?195.00, subdivision 1, of the Penal Law of the State of New York, in that the defendant, a public servant, on or about the 9'11 day of June, 2017, in the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, did knowingly and unlawfully, and with intent to obtain a bene?t or deprive another person of a bene?t, commit an act relating to his of?ce but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his of?cial functions, knowing that ?such act is unauthorized, to wit: on the aforesaid date and at the aforesaid place, the defendant, with the intent to conceal his unlawful and/or unauthorized entry into 112 Oakwood Avenue, Troy, New York, and his refusal to take possession of what he reasonable believed to be cocaine found therein, and in an attempt to dissuade another from revealing same, did offer a Police Of?cer with knowledge thereof the opportunity to receive overtime bene?ts that he had not, as of that date, received. Dated this 3 day of TMUMES 2018 at Troy, New York. 2 PAUL CZAIK M. C, Special Districtaiqtoglg) lo? ?1 6? 4.. FORE AN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' yt To: ' .111r)a.r>alSANYS)" )" Cc: ' (CRM)" czi Subject: RE: SDNY case Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:46:21 +0000 Dea I heard you defeated the bail proposal. Congrats! My meeting with the Paris Prosecutor's Office was pushed by a day, and is now set for January 7th. Can we pick a time for a call between now and then? Would Tuesday the 5th in the am (NY time) work for everyone? In the meantime, I am referring the French MLAT request to your IC ). I don't know if you have any privilege issues in your case...and I don't see anything in the request that would revealed any privileged info. But I wanted to mention, in case anyone needs to screen it before it comes to you. If not, I can send it to you directly as well. DOJ Attache/Magistrat de liaison anthicain U.S. Embassy, Paris From: Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 6:03 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (CRM) < Subject: RE: SDNY case Hi all, (CRM) Maxwell's attorneys filed the attached supplemental report from their French

12p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "

From: " :1" To:' Subject: accessory Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:33:58 +0000 Embedded: possible_guidelines_calculation.msg Just throwing this out there, but accessory after the fact (18 U.S.C. 3) has the following elements: First, that the crime of [specify crime' alleged in the Indictment was committed by 'specify offenderl; Second, that the defendant had knowledge of the commission of that crime and [the offender's' participation in it: Third, that with such knowledge, the defendant in some way assisted 'the offender' with the specific purpose or plan to hinder or prevent [the offender's' apprehension, trial or punishment. The punishment is: an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment [. . .]; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years. One-half the maximum term of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking being, of course, a cap of 2.5 years.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department ofJustiee United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Bullefing One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 August 19, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Judge Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: As the Court is aware, on the morning of August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. On August 16, 2019, and after conducting an autopsy, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York issued a statement identifying the cause of death as hanging, and the manner of death as suicide. In light of the death of the defendant prior to a conviction becoming final, the Government must request the Court approve the attached proposed or

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regardin...

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, arguing that the defendant's request for early disclosure is not justified and that the court's current plan for juror name disclosure is sufficient. The government contends that the defendant is seeking extra time to conduct research on prospective jurors without a valid reason. The government's response cites relevant case law and the court's previous orders to support its position.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.