Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-6772940Court Unsealed

Montana Civil Suit

Date
February 10, 2020
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-6772940
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 1:20-cv-00069-RTH Document 1 Filed 01/22/20 Page 1 of 5 Receipt number AUSFCC-5927155 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS RICHARD DOE, WILLIAM DOE, and JAMES DOE, each a citizen of the Blackfeet Nation, CASE NO. 20-69 C COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, Defendant. COME NOW Plaintiffs Richard Doe, William Doe, and James Doe by and through their attorneys, and hereby state as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action agains

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cv-00069-RTH Document 1 Filed 01/22/20 Page 1 of 5 Receipt number AUSFCC-5927155 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS RICHARD DOE, WILLIAM DOE, and JAMES DOE, each a citizen of the Blackfeet Nation, CASE NO. 20-69 C COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, dba INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, Defendant. COME NOW Plaintiffs Richard Doe, William Doe, and James Doe by and through their attorneys, and hereby state as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action against the United States of America under Article 7 of the Treaty with the Blackfeet, 1855, for damages caused by depredations and other unlawful acts committed by a white man residing in the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 2. Richard Doe, William Doe, and James Doe, proceeding by pseudonym given the nature of this action (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), are each citizens of the Blackfeet Nation and at all relevant times herein resided on the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, which borders Canada and the State of Montana. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1491 (a) (1), as this civil action against the United States arises from the Treaty with the Blackfeet, 1855, an Act of Congress and a contract between Plaintiffs and the United States. Page 1 Case 1:20-cv-00069-RTH Document 1 Filed 01/22/20 Page 2 of 5 FACTS 4. Plaintiff Richard Doe was born in 1983. Plaintiff James Doe was born in 1979. Plaintiff William Doe was born in 1983. 5. Beginning in approximately 1992 in Browning, Montana, within the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, Indian Health Service employee and officer Dr. Stanley Weber sexually abused multiple Blackfeet boys. 6. Dr. Stanley Weber is a Caucasian citizen of the United States, and was residing on the Blackfeet Indian Reservation pursuant to his employment with the United States as a physician through its agency the Indian Health Service, and as such was a white man residing in the Blackfeet Nation’s country within the meaning of the Treaty with the Blackfeet, 1855. 7. In September of 2018, Dr. Stanley Weber was convicted of sexually abusing two boys who are citizens of the Blackfeet Nation and were at all relevant times residents of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. Weber was sentenced to 18 years in federal prison and a $200,000 fine. One of the two boys Weber was convicted of abusing is among the Plaintiffs. 8. Dr. Stanley Weber sexually abused Plaintiffs on numerous occasions and in numerous locations, including in at least two business offices of the Indian Health Service located within the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. 9. As a direct result of the criminal conduct of Dr. Stanley Weber, Plaintiffs experienced physical injury and pain and suffering, to be described further at trial. Page 2 Case 1:20-cv-00069-RTH Document 1 Filed 01/22/20 Page 3 of 5 CLAIM FOR RELIEF 10. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 9 as if fully stated herein. 11. As citizens of the Blackfeet Nation, Plaintiffs are beneficiaries of the United States’ Treaty with the Blackfeet, 1855 (hereinafter “the Treaty”). 12. Article 7 of the Treaty provides, in relevant part, as follows: The aforesaid nations and tribes of Indians agree that citizens of the United States may live in and pass unmolested through the countries respectively occupied and claimed by them. And the United States is hereby bound to protect said Indians against depredations and other unlawful acts which white men residing in or passing through their country may commit. (Emphasis added.) 13. The Treaty, signed under duress and the overt threat of military violence, and without adequate translators who could explain the Treaty’s terms in Native languages, was executed on behalf of the United States by the notorious commander of American forces in the “Yakima Native American War of 1855,” Isaac I. Stevens. Within six months of the Treaty’s October 1855 signing date, Stevens’ forces in the Washington Territory were subjecting Native peoples in the Columbia River watershed to mass violence. With the foregoing background, Article 11 of the Treaty provides: The aforesaid tribes acknowledge their dependence on the government of the United States, and promise to be friendly with all citizens thereof, and to commit no depredations or other violence upon such citizens. And should any one or more violate this pledge, and the fact be proved to the satisfaction of the President, the property taken shall be returned, or, in default thereof, or if injured or destroyed, compensation may be made by the government out of [funds owed to the Blackfeet Nation]. The aforesaid tribes are hereby bound to deliver such offenders to the proper authorities for trial and punishment, and are held responsible in their tribal capacity, to make reparation for depredations so committed. (Emphasis added). Page 3 Case 1:20-cv-00069-RTH Document 1 Filed 01/22/20 Page 4 of 5 14. At the time the Treaty became effective, the United States had for more than two decades engaged in forcible removal of Native peoples to reservations westerly of the Natives’ indigenous lands, to make room for what the treaties refer to as “white men.” Those events are now known as the “Trail of Tears.” 15. Because treaties with Native American tribes arose under circumstances of duress, and said duress was manifestly obvious when the Treaty was enacted, the terms of the Treaty are construed in favor of the Blackfeet, taking into account defects at the time the Treaty arose including failures to adequately translate the Treaty into native languages prior to execution and recognition that refusal on the Blackfeet’s part to execute the Treaty would result in violence. 16. At all times material hereto, Dr. Stanley Weber was subject to the authority of the United States, was an employee and officer of the United States, through its Indian Health Service, and was placed within the Blackfeet Indian Reservation by the United States to further the purposes and interests of the United States. 17. The United States bound itself to protect Plaintiffs from the depredations and unlawful acts of Dr. Stanley Weber, a white man residing in the Blackfeet Indian Reservation under the auspices and at the behest of the United States, under the terms of the Treaty. 18. Criminal sexual abuse of minors is a “depredation” and “other unlawful act” within the meaning of the Treaty. 19. The United States failed to protect Plaintiffs from the criminal sexual abuse perpetrated by its agent, officer, and employee, Dr. Stanley Weber, and thereby breached its Treaty and contractual obligations to Plaintiffs. Page 4 Case 1:20-cv-00069-RTH Document 1 Filed 01/22/20 Page 5 of 5 20. Because the United States breached its Treaty and contractual obligations to protect Plaintiffs from the criminal sexual abuse perpetrated by its agent, employee, and officer, Dr. Stanley Weber, Plaintiffs are entitled to monetary damages for the pain and suffering they sustained as a result of Dr. Stanley Weber’s criminal sexual abuse. WHEREFORE, each Plaintiff makes a claim for compensatory damages against the United States in the amount of $3,000,000.00, for a total of $9,000,000.00, costs, attorney’s fees, and all other damages permitted by the Treaty with the Blackfeet, 1855, and for such other and further relief as this Court deems proper. DATED this 22nd day of January, 2020. CREW JANCI LLP s/William Stewart Stephen Crew, OSB No. 781715 (Admission Pending) Peter Janci, OSB No. 074249 (Admission Pending) William Stewart, OSB No. 124670 (Admitted to Ct. of Claims) 1200 NW Naito Pkwy, Ste 500 Portland, OR 97209 Tel: 503.306.0224 Fax: 503.467.4940 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] EDMISTON & COLTON LAW FIRM Shane D. Colton, (Admitted to Ct. of Claims) Tanis M. Holm (Admitted to Ct. of Claims) 310 Grand Ave. Billings, MT 59101 Tel: 406.545.0889 Fax: 506.259.1094 [email protected] [email protected] Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs Page 5

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Westlaw.

Westlaw. Pagel 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) H United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees, 1. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Roy Black, Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 13-12923. April 18, 2014. Background: Alleged minor victims of federal sex crimes brought action against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act ( CVRA) re- lated to the United States Attorney Office's execution of non-prosecution agree- ment with alleged perpetrator. After the victims moved for disclosure of corres- pondence concerning the non-prosecution agreement, the alleged perpetrator and his criminal defense attorneys intervened to assert privilege to prevent the disclos- ure of their plea negotiations. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Court, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM, ordered disclosure. The inter- v

16p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Page 1

Page 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA IN RE: JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. / Federal Courthouse West Palm Beach, Florida July 11, 2008 10:15 a.m. The above entitled matter came on for Emergency Petitioner for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra, pursuant to Notice, taken before Victoria Aiello, Court Reporter, pages 1-32. For the Plaintiff: Bradley Edwards, Esquire For the Defendant: IAUSA AUSA OFFICIAL REPORTING SERVICES, LLC (954) 467-8204 EFTA00212747 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 (Call toOrder of the Court). THE COURT: Good morning. Please be seated. This is the case of In Re: Jane Doe, Case Number 08-80736-Civ-Marra. May I have counsel state their appearances, please? MR. Good morning, Your Honor. May it please the Court, for the United States of America,

33p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FRENCH REPUBLIC

FRENCH REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF JUSTICE APPEAL COURT OF PARIS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF PARIS COURT OF JUSTICE Paris, July 8, 2020 DIVISION Section P4 - Public Prosecution Service for Minors. The Public Prosecutor To Prosecutor-General at the Appeal Court of Paris. SUBJECT: Request for international legal assistance in criminal matter addressed to the United States authorities concerning the investigation related to Jean-Luc BRUNEI., and others, in connection with the "EPSTEIN case". N/REF : prosecution number : 19 235 449 V/REF : APPLICANT AUTHORITY The Public Prosecutor at the Paris Court of Justice. AUTHORITY ADDRESSED TO The competent authorities of the United States of America. Having regard to the accord between the European Union and the United States of America dated June 25, 2003 which entered into force on February 1, 2010 ; Having regard to the Article 14 of the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance between France and the United States dated December 10,

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

j782epsC kjc

j782epsC kjc UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. 19 Cr. 490(RMB) Conference July 8, 2019 1:20 p.m. HON. HENRY B. PITMAN, APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG Attorney for Defendant MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant Also Present: Special Agent Detective FBI , NYPD Magistrate Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079704 j782epsC kjc 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE DEPUTY CLERK: Counsel, please state your name for the record. MR. : Good afternoon, your Honor. For the government, , and With us are Special

24p
Court UnsealedJan 26, 2015

Dershowitz Supplement to Motion for Limited Intervention

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 285 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2015 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOES #2 Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ________________________________/ ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S SUPPLEMENT TO HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION (DE 282) Alan M. Dershowitz, a nonparty to this litigation, respectfully supplements his previously filed Motion for Limited Intervention (

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims from around 1994 to 1997. The Government filed a first (S1) superseding indictment shortly thereafter, which contained only small, ministerial corrections. The SI superseding indictment included two counts of enticement or transportation of minors to engage in illegal sex acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July

34p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.