Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
dc-7009727Court UnsealedDeposition

Giuffre v Maxwell 2015 Protective Order

Case Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 02/26/2016 Document 1078-4 Flled 07/29/20 Page 2 Of 1%0001/0026 BOIES, SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP N?nY?orkl Washm ?toniDU?lFlonda?IWede?m 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 35 6-00 1 1 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET T0: Laura Menninger, Esq- Fax No. 303.832.2628 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. Telephone No. 303.831.7364 FROM: Sigrid S. McCawley,

Date
July 29, 2020
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
dc-7009727
Pages
10
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 02/26/2016 Document 1078-4 Flled 07/29/20 Page 2 Of 1%0001/0026 BOIES, SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP N?nY?orkl Washm ?toniDU?lFlonda?IWede?m 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 35 6-00 1 1 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET T0: Laura Menninger, Esq- Fax No. 303.832.2628 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. Telephone No. 303.831.7364 FROM: Sigrid S. McCawley,

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 02/26/2016 Document 1078-4 Flled 07/29/20 Page 2 Of 1%0001/0026 BOIES, SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP N?nY?orkl Washm ?toniDU?lFlonda?IWede?m 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 35 6-00 1 1 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET T0: Laura Menninger, Esq- Fax No. 303.832.2628 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. Telephone No. 303.831.7364 FROM: Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Total Number of Pages: 26 DATE: February 26, 2016 (including this cover sheet) RE: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case no. MESSAGE: Attached please ?nd a COpy of my email transmission to you from today at 12:10 pm, along with the accompanying Agreed Protective Order in both redline and clean version. Thank you. THE ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGES such information back to us. Thank you. This facsimile transmission is intended solely {or the above-named recipient and may contain con?dential information which is exempt ?om disclosure and protected by the attomey?client and/or attorney work?product privileges. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is strictly prohibited and may result in civil and/or criminal liability. If any ofthc information centained in this transmission is misdirected to you, please call (954) 356?0011 collect and mail 02/26/2016 Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page3 of 10310019/0026 United States District Court Southern District Of New York Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-l37433?RWS Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Upon a showing of good cause in support of the entry of a protective order to protect the discovery and dissemination of con?dential information, including sensitive personal information relating to a victim of sexual abuse, copyright or trade secrets, commercially sensitive information, or proprietary information. I. Purposes And Limitations The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures during discovery. Designations under this Order shall be made Sparingly, with care, and shall not be made absent a good faith belief that the designated material satis?es the criteria set forth herein. If it comes to a Designating Party?s attention that designated material does not qualify for protection at all, or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Designating Party must notify all other parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation. IT IS ORDERED: 02/25/2015 Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page4of1-0020/0026 1. This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and information, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. As used in this Protective Order, ?document? is de?ned as provided in FED.R.CIV.P. 34(a). A dra? or non-identical copy is a separate document Within the meaning of this term. 3. Information designated shall be information that is confidential and is covered by common law and statutory privacy protections of plaintiff [REDACTED] and defendant Ghislaine Maxwell or any non~party that was subject to sexual abuse. 4. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation and trial of this case and any related matter, including but not limited to, investigations by law enforcement. 5. CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or infonnation (collectively shall not, without the consent of the party producing it or further Order of the Court, be disclosed except that such information may be disclosed to: a. attorneys actively working on this case; b. persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on this case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case; C. the parties; d. expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in this case; 6. the Cetut and its employees (?Court Personnel?) in this case; f. stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident to the conduct of this actiOn; g. deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses; h. any person (1) who authored or received the particular Protected Materialany point in time access to the Protected Material outside of the context of this action; or (3) for which there is a good faith basis to conclude that the individual has earlier received or seen such Protected Material; and i. any other persons by written agreement of the parties or by Order of a Court of competent jurisdiction. 6. Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to any person listed above (other than counsel, persons employed by counsel, Court Personnel and stenographic reporters), counsel shall provide such person with a cepy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a written acknowledgment stating that he or she has read this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions. All such acknowledgments shall be retained by counsel and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by opposing counsel. 7. Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or af?xing on them (in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice: Discovery material designated CONFIDENTIAL shall be identi?ed by Bates number. To the extent practical, the respective legend shall be placed near the Bates number. 8. Designation of a document as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall constitute a representation that such document has been reviewed by an attorney for the designating party, that there is a valid and good faith basis for such designation, made at the time of disclosure or production to the receiving party, and that disclosure of such information to persons other than those permitted access to such material Would cause a privacy harm to the designating party. 9. Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, the deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided mitten notice of the designation is given to all counsel of mood within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the completion of the transcript, and until the expiration of such thirty (3 0) days after notice by the court reporter of the 02/26/2016 Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page7of10@0023/0026 completion of the transcript, no party or counsel for any such party may share the contents of the deposition outside the limitations of this Protective Order. 10. Whenever a party seeks to ?le any document 0r material containing CONFIDENTIAL WFORMATION with the Court in this matter, it shall be accompanied by a Motion to Seal pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Electronic Case Filing Rules Instructions for the Southern District of New York. 11. Challenging Designations Of Protected Material (21) A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation of Discovery Material under this Order at the time the designation is made, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Moreover, failure to challenge the designation of any Discovery Material as not in any way constitute an admission that such material centains any competitively sensitive inferrnation, trade secret information, or other protectable material. In the event that counsel for the Party receiving Protected Material objects to the CONFIDENTIAL designation of any or all such items, said counsel shall provide the Producing Party and, if different, the Designating Party written notice of, and the basis for, such objections. The Parties will use their best efforts to resolve such objections among themselves. Should the Receiving Party, the Producing Party and, if different, the Designating Party be unable to resolve the 02/26/2016 14zgnseg:15-cv-O7433-LAP Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page80f10@0024/0026 12. l3. l4. objections, the Receiving Party may seek a hearing before this Court with respect to the propriety of the designation. The Designating Party will c00perate in obtaining a prompt hearing with respect thereto. Pending a resolution, the discovery material in question shall continue to be treated as Protected Material as provided hereunder. The burden of proving that Discovery Material is preperly designated shall at all times remain with the Designating Party. At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon, each document and all copies thereof which have been designated as CONFIDENTIAL shall be returned to the party that designated it CONFIDENTIAL, or the parties may elect to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents. Where the parties agree to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents, the destroying party shall provide all parties with an af?davit con?rming the destruction. With respect to any Discovery Material produced by such non-party, the non~party may invoke the terms of this Order in writing to all Parties by designating Discovery Material Any such Protected Material produced by the non~party designated shall be subject to the restrictions contained in this Order and shall only be disclosed or used in a manner consistent with this Order. In the event that any Producing Party inadvertently produces Discovery Material eligible for designation as CONFIDENTIAL without such designation, the Parties agree that the Producing Party may retroactively apply the correct designation. If a 02/23/2013 Document 1078-4 Flled 07/29/20 Page 9 Of 10. 0025/0026 16. Producing Party makes a subsequent designation, the Receiving Party will treat the Protected Material according to the retroactive designation, including undertaking best efforts to retrieve all previously distributed copies from any recipients now ineligible to access the Protected Material. Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way the use or disclosure of Protected Material by a Receiving Party that is or has become publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; that is lawfully acquired by or known to the Receiving Party independent of the Producing Party; (0) that was previously produced, disclosed, and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an obligation of con?dentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; with the consent of the Producing Party and, if different, the Designating Party; pursuant to Order of the Court; or for purposes of law enforcement.15. This Protective Order shall have no force and effect on the use of any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION at trial in this matter.This Protective Order may be modi?ed by the Court at any time fer good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard. 02/23/2013 Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page 10 of 1-0026/0026 BY THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

FaxFacsimile: (954) 356-0022
Phone(954) 356-0022
Phone303.831.7364
Phone303.832.2628

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA01079548

30p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)

The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre

1p
House OversightUnknown

Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads

Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures

The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s

17p
House OversightMar 20, 2017

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusations against Alan Dershowitz. While many of the claims have been publicly reported, the filing includes sealed exhibits and specific procedural motions (Rule 21/15) that could provide new evidentiary leads, such as the referenced sealed documents and the alleged list of other powerful individuals (politicians, business executives, foreign leaders). The presence of a judge’s order striking certain allegations and the detailed procedural history suggest actionable avenues for further discovery and verification. Key insights: Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor.; Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them with proper evidence.; Reference to a “list of numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Minister, and other world leaders” in the Rule 21 motion.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionOct 22, 2020

Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript

EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS -againstGHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x **CONFIDENTIAL** Videotaped deposition of GHISLAINE MAXWELL, taken pursuant to subpoena, was held at the law offices of BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER, 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, commencing April 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above

465p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.