EFTA00014060
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
EFTA01325031
EFTA00027776
EFTA01325051
EFTA00014150
Alan Dershowitz Extended Rebuttal to [REDACTED - Survivor] Allegations
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 90 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-03377-LAP v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] (“Giuffre”) and asserts Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims as follows: ANSWER NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This paragrap
Bcc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)"
From To Cc: Bcc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" Roy BLACK' Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:23:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DE30_081016_Reply_re_Motn_Unseal.pdf; DE30-2_081016_Ex_tpdf; DE30- 3_081016_Ex_2.pdf Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the Un
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.