Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00014060DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00014060

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00014060
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jay Lefl«miti To: alliff (USAFLS)" a, "Roy Black" Cc: aSAFLS)" Subject: Re: Jane Does v. United States Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:39:43 +0000 Importance: Normal (USAFLS)" Thank you for sending this. Jay From: ' (USAFLS)" Sent: WW20080237Ph4AST To: < >; Jay Leflcowitz Cc: (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" < > Subject: Jane Does v. United States I Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the United States' Response to the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement, which was filed in the victims' rights suit filed against the United States by Attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of two of the victims. In his motion to unseal, Attorney Edwards stated that he would provide notice of his motion to counsel for Mr. Epstein. I do not know if he actually did so. In our response, we oppose the Petitioners' motion, and point out that Mr. Edwards has filed a civil suit against Mr. Epstein and that litigation regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement is more appropriate in that forum where the real party in interest (Mr. Epstein) is a party to the suit. <<DE29_081008_Resp to Motn Unseal.pdt>> Assistant U.S. Attorney Fax *WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and EFTA00014060 destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. ******www*•www***ww**aaa**aa+**www*kwww**aww***ww**www*kwww EFTA00014061

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01325031

20p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00027776

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01325051

20p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014150

0p
Court UnsealedNov 8, 2019

Alan Dershowitz Extended Rebuttal to [REDACTED - Survivor] Allegations

Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 90 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-03377-LAP v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] (“Giuffre”) and asserts Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims as follows: ANSWER NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This paragrap

274p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Bcc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)"

From To Cc: Bcc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" Roy BLACK' Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:23:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DE30_081016_Reply_re_Motn_Unseal.pdf; DE30-2_081016_Ex_tpdf; DE30- 3_081016_Ex_2.pdf Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the Un

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.