Case File
efta-efta00016245DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00016245
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00016245
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: '
r
To: "-
r
)" <1
Cc: '
Subject: RE:
memo
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:56:07 +0000
Sure, I'll cut that and see if I=
wants to add it back in. Will send now, cc'ing you guys. Thanks!
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 3:55 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE:
memo
<
>
>
Thank you for having that discussion, and for drafting (hilarious — though ultimately probably helpful — that she wanted
you to draft their views rather than just sending us a paragraph). My only thought is that given the change in our views of
obstructive conduct (particularly with respect to destruction of materials) since they reviewed the Update Memo,
would it be more straightforward to highlight just the large number of underage victims (and not the more outdated
obstruction elements, as presumably many trafficking victims in other cases also conceal the schemes from police, and we
don't ordinarily charge them)? Other than that, no additional thoughts, and thanks again.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 15:48
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE:
memo
>
I spoke with =.
Bottom line, she thinks it's a close call between making
take a felony plea and declining to
prosecute, but she ultimately comes down in favor of a felony plea. She does not think we should charge
with sex
trafficking.
asked me to send her and I= a draft of the summary of their views that we plan to send up to the brass. Below is
what I'd propose:
Our Office's Human Trafficking Coordinators have reviewed the prosecution team's Update Memo as well as
submission, and are aware of the details of the Epstein investigation. In the Coordinators' experience, our Office
ordinarily would decline to prosecute a victim-participant like
absent certain aggravating factors, such as the use of
violence by the victim-participant on others, or the victim-perpetrator continuing to run a sex trafficking operation in the
absence of her abuser. Because those aggravating factors are not present here, the Coordinators believe it is a very close
call between declining to prosecute
and requiring
to enter a felony plea. Ultimately, though, the
Coordinators support a felony plea disposition along the lines set forth in
submission given the unique
circumstances of her case. In particular, the Coordinators believe that the large number of underage victims, together
with
obstructive conduct, warrant a felony plea. The Coordinators support such a disposition, in part, because a
plea will allow victims to gain a sense of closure and to have their voices heard at sentencing if they choose. Given the
mitigating factors presented in
submission—most notably the sexual abuse she suffered at Epstein's hands—the
Coordinators do not believe that our Office should charge
with sex trafficking.
What do you think?
EFTA00016245
From:
)°c
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 11:59 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE:
memo
Great thanks
From:
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 23:11
To:
Cc:
<
>
Subject: Re:
memo
I have a call tentatively scheduled with =tomorrow afternoon.
has not confirmed whether she's joining.
On Apr 6, 2020, at 10:42 PM,
> wrote:
Have we heard anything from
and/or =?
Russell's comments ask about that specifically so wanted to check.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
212.637.2415
EFTA00016246
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
212.637.2415Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.