Case File
efta-efta00016814DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00016814
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00016814
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
r
To:
(USANYS)"
Cc: a'
USANY
><1
ll
.1.1r)
.a
Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:16:48 +0000
I just need to add "revocations" throughout, which I can do this afternoon, by about 3:00, and then circulate. Will
do.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2020, at 12:05,
(USANYS)
> wrote:
Just wanted to circle back on this
are you signed off? Is this something we could get over to Part I today or
tomorrow? Thanks
From:
)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc
)
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
(USANYS)
cz
>
is is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's
unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer.
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To:
Cc:
<MS
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
(USANYS)
Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to
be
From:
) 'aa
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To:
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
Cc
)
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to
include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.
thanks,
EFTA00016814
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To:
(USANYS) <
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have
now received. Would you take a look when you can?
-
I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized
the new stuff we're looking to share?
Thanks,
EFTA00016815
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.