Case File
efta-efta00019322DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00019322
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00019322
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To: '
Subject: RE: US v Epstein
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 02:16:08 +0000
It's just outrageous.
From:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 22:15
To:
Subject: Re: US v Epstein
Boils my blood
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2019, at 10:03 PM,
wrote:
I don't believe it's public, or at least not that I could find anywhere. His attorneys just sent it to us.
From:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 22:02
To:
Cc:
=.=
';
Subject: Re: US v Epstein
That is incredible. This is a public document?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2019, at 9:50 PM,
>
wrote:
It's extremely notable that his attorneys are talking about how they're not satisfied with the medical examiner's
conclusion that his death was by suicide when they know full well, as reflected in the attached, that he updated his will
the day before he died. (He also appears to have reorganized the structure of his assets also on August 8 — see the
references to the "1953 Trust" apparently established on that date; note that 1953 is the year he was born.)
In terms of other useful information, for all the cloak and dagger about who the executor was, it turns out it's his two
main lawyers, Indyke and Kahn, who handle virtually all of his business activities (and of whom we were already well
aware). It appears that those executors have the ability to deal with claims against the estate or its assets.
As for where his assets actually go, it all goes to the "acting Trustees of the 1953 Trust" — i.e., nobody is named herein.
From:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 14:20
To:
Cc:
EFTA00019322
Subject: RE: US v Epstein
Sure — I just emailed them to ask.
From:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 14:17
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: US v Epstein
Can we ask for copies?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2019, at 2:08 PM,
wrote:
FYI below, re: probating the estate. Based on a quick search I don't see any place where a probate petition would be
publicly filed, though entirely possible it's somewhere I couldn't find.
From: Martin G. Weinberg •cl
>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 08:30
To:
Subject: US v Epstein
>;
>; 'Martin G. Weinberg' <
; 'Michael Miller'
during our telephone conversation yesterday you asked for information regarding the status of the
estate. Yesterday in the Virgin Islands there was a fiing of a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will.
Marty
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law
Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the
addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
of the contents of this message is prohibited.
<Probate Petition and Will_.pdf.>
EFTA00019323
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Wire Ref
referencesWire Ref
reflectedRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Darren Indyke
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01993483
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01589524
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
9p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00035669
0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown
Court filings: 8
The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.
4p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.