Case File
efta-efta00939376DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00939376
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: Eileen Alexanderson
Subject: Re: FW: follow up
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:48:08 +0000
i would do nothing until all the issues are known„ i would definilty not add the munch to any existing entitiy, .
art loan, ultimate disposiotn, estate considerations. etc. I do not have the belief regardin turning off the income„
i have concerns that many pieces are not yet known.. questions about indepnedince of the trustees„ might be
problematic , if the sec filings are inconsistant. currently , there are many open questions, and i see no rush..
It might be deemed more important that the trustees are not independent.. ie f.:111 emplyess under leons control
to justify the no filing, of any financiail interest, or control. sorry, i know you would like fast answers..
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Eileen Alexanderson
wrote:
Hello Jeffrey,
Leon mentioned that you recommended he put the new Munch into a Delaware LLC to provide more
flexibility in the future. This would otherwise be going into Narrow Holdings LLC, a New York LLC. Is the
point that it's important that the painting is in an LLC by itself or that it's a Delaware LLC? Not sure at this
point that we will proceed with the art partnership but just want to make sure I understand what you meant on
this subject-is your thought this artwork should not go into the art partnership even if in a separate LLC?
Also, I know you believe the transfer to the kids will be complete only at the time we turn off the income right
but since this is the key issue, I was just wondering if you had a chance to read through the attached 2006 Trust
document and whether you had any thoughts re Carlyn's defense that we'd be ok if it was the independent
trustees that turned off the income right ie. out of Leon's control?
Still working on the issues you raised in terms the way ownership is titled on various filings-should have a
conclusion on this tomorrow.
Thank you!!
Eileen
Original Message-----
From: Eileen Alexanderson
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:09 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])
Subject: follow up
Jeffrey, thinking back through dialogs with Carlyn & Elyse and looking at some of my old notes from those
dialogs that relate to our conversation this morning I offer the following:
Regarding the issue of why turning off the income right now works is that it would be the independent trustees
turning off the income right, not Leon, and that the 2006 Trust was drafted purposely in anticipation of this. I
believe this relates to the language on page 30 in the attached.
Also, Ada (from US Trust) at one point had suggested to Carlyn that we consider having the trustees turn of
the income right in the 2006 Trust and then decant the assets from the 2006 Trust into a new trust before
proceeding with the Art Partnership to insure a cleaner transaction.
Also, on the subject of the 2006 Trust and other trust paying their own taxes-important implication for Black
Family Partners would be that we no longer have a single taxpayer.
EFTA00939376
Best,
Eileen
Original Message-----
From: NY_730_11_XRX_COPYROOM [mailto:NY_730_11_XRX_COPYROOM®apollolp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Eileen Alexanderson
Subject: Scan from a Xerox Color
Please open the attached document. It was scanned and sent to you using a Xerox Color.
Number of Images: 60
Attachment File Type: PDF
Device Name: NY_ 730_ 11 XRX COPYROOM
_
_ _
_
Device Location:
For more information on Xerox products and solutions, please visit http://www.xerox.com/
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the person or entity to whom they are
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please contact the sender and delete the material from
any computer.
Apollo Global Management, LLC
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00939377
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01682184
186p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01370863
1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown
Medical Record/Clinical Encounter: DOJ-OGR-00026334
This clinical encounter document from the Bureau of Prisons details a medical evaluation of Jeffrey Epstein on July 12, 2019. It covers his medical history, current complaints, and treatment, including discussions around his triglyceride levels, sleep apnea, and back pain. The document was generated by the treating physician at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.
1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00014087
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02367961
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01977826
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.