Case File
efta-01385929DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01385929
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01385929
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
27 March 2015
US Fixed Income Weekly
United States
Treasuries
Rates
Gov. Bonds & Swaps
•
Our 5s-10s UST model shows the curve is 60 bps (3.9 standard errors) too
flat to Fed fund expectations and inflation outlook. We explore some
factors that could drive this departure from the model fair value.
•
The difference between survey-based and market-based inflation measures
could explain for about 35 bps of the deviation in our model. Higher term
premium in the 5y sector could also account for another 15 bps. Taken
together, it's reasonable to expect that 5s-10s is only 10 bps too flat.
•
We still like buying 5s on the curve. The 2s-5s-10s fly spread is 12 bps too
high when regressed against the 2yly rate.
5s-10s UST: a four-sigma event? (or something more
prosaic)
If the 5s-10s slope was completely determined by the level of short rates, Fed
expectation and medium term inflation outlook, then the current excessively
(and well-advertised) flatness of the curve is something of a massive anomaly
that should have only 0.01% probability of occurrence.
In modeling 5s-10s using observations going back the last 25 years, three
variables - Fed funds, 2s-funds and the Michigan 5-10y inflation survey - have
explained 88% of the variance in 5s-10s. It is puzzling then why the market has
priced in such a flat 5s-10s that's 60 bps (or 3.9 standard errors) below the
model's predicted value.
i55- I Os UST, actual vs. fitted
110
1.40
1.20
1.00
OSO
0.60
0.40
0.20
" Peron
—5s.10s actual
—Pined
(120)
kobcted • 0087.0 207
008' 2s-Fuods + 0.39' 6Y WOO Id
MAW
Sonde WWI 411990 - 12/2014. Rupee • 88%
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Soots ifikentelpfiveneelnnIdatIOSIIInt
Alex 1 t
Research Analyst
I+ 1) 212 250-5483
alax-g.leclb.corn
!Model residual (actual minus fitted)
80
bp
60
40
*2 sigma
20
Model residual
r4 ai0na
0
(20)
(40)
(60)
1814 .
1990
.4 sigma
1995
2000
.Sown• lifternteg MorweLPerslOwtioVi err
2005
One explanation is the divergence of market-based measures of inflation
expectations from survey-based measures that's used in our model. While the
median Michigan survey respondent expected 2.80% year-on-year inflation
over the next 5-10 years, the 5Y5Y CPI swap has fallen to 2.20% from 2.80%
six months ago. The Fed's 5-year forward breakeven inflation measure is even
lower at 1.90%. The difference between survey and market inflation measures
Page 16
2010
2015
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
DB-SDNY-0087397
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00233581
EFTA01385929
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
212 250-5483Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.