Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01385929DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01385929

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01385929
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly United States Treasuries Rates Gov. Bonds & Swaps Our 5s-10s UST model shows the curve is 60 bps (3.9 standard errors) too flat to Fed fund expectations and inflation outlook. We explore some factors that could drive this departure from the model fair value. The difference between survey-based and market-based inflation measures could explain for about 35 bps of the deviation in our model. Higher term premium in the 5y sector could also account for another 15 bps. Taken together, it's reasonable to expect that 5s-10s is only 10 bps too flat. We still like buying 5s on the curve. The 2s-5s-10s fly spread is 12 bps too high when regressed against the 2yly rate. 5s-10s UST: a four-sigma event? (or something more prosaic) If the 5s-10s slope was completely determined by the level of short rates, Fed expectation and medium term inflation outlook, then the current excessively (and well-advertised) flatness of the curve is something of a massive anomaly that should have only 0.01% probability of occurrence. In modeling 5s-10s using observations going back the last 25 years, three variables - Fed funds, 2s-funds and the Michigan 5-10y inflation survey - have explained 88% of the variance in 5s-10s. It is puzzling then why the market has priced in such a flat 5s-10s that's 60 bps (or 3.9 standard errors) below the model's predicted value. i55- I Os UST, actual vs. fitted 110 1.40 1.20 1.00 OSO 0.60 0.40 0.20 " Peron —5s.10s actual —Pined (120) kobcted • 0087.0 207 008' 2s-Fuods + 0.39' 6Y WOO Id MAW Sonde WWI 411990 - 12/2014. Rupee • 88% 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Soots ifikentelpfiveneelnnIdatIOSIIInt Alex 1 t Research Analyst I+ 1) 212 250-5483 alax-g.leclb.corn !Model residual (actual minus fitted) 80 bp 60 40 *2 sigma 20 Model residual r4 ai0na 0 (20) (40) (60) 1814 . 1990 .4 sigma 1995 2000 .Sown• lifternteg MorweLPerslOwtioVi err 2005 One explanation is the divergence of market-based measures of inflation expectations from survey-based measures that's used in our model. While the median Michigan survey respondent expected 2.80% year-on-year inflation over the next 5-10 years, the 5Y5Y CPI swap has fallen to 2.20% from 2.80% six months ago. The Fed's 5-year forward breakeven inflation measure is even lower at 1.90%. The difference between survey and market inflation measures Page 16 2010 2015 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0087397 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00233581 EFTA01385929

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone212 250-5483

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.