Case File
efta-01385960DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01385960
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01385960
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
27 March 2015
US Fixed Income Weekly
issues discussed earlier. Consequently, even though the stronger dollar will
weigh on net exports and help dampen inflation pressures, the drop in energy
will ultimately be a boon to consumers. Regarding the negative impact on
energy-related spending and hiring, it is worth noting that employment within
the transportation sector, arguably the industry best positioned to benefit from
lower fuel costs, is more than three times larger than the energy sector as a
percentage of total employment (4.6% vs. 1.4%). The reason we have not
lowered our GDP forecast for 2015 or beyond is that we believe that dollar
appreciation will be offset by the stimulus from lower oil prices. Hence, we are
maintaining our top-down forecast from last December, but the mix of
underlying output growth has changed —we have factored in a larger drag
from international trade, but this is largely offset by stronger domestic
spending
If the economy is able grow 3% this year, the unemployment rate is likely to
continue declining at its current pace, which is roughly one percentage point
per year. Our forecast assumes the unemployment rate will fall to 4.7% by
yearend, which is well below the Fed's central tendency of 5.0% to 5.2%. This
further expected tightening in the labor market, which will be accompanied by
rising hiring and quit rates, should exert upward pressure on labor costs. In
turn, this should add to policymakers' confidence that inflation will trend back
toward their 2% target, thus allowing the Fed to begin the process of monetary
policy normalization at the September 16.17 FOMC meeting. As always, there
are risks to the economic and financial outlook.
•
With respect to output growth, there is a risk that recent dollar
appreciation exerts a larger-than-anticipated drag on the US economy than
what we have assumed in our forecast. This would also put further
downward pressure on goods inflation and likely stay the commencement
of interest rate normalization a bit longer.
•
Another downside risk is that the second-order effects of lower energy
prices on capital spending and energy-related employment are larger than
what we currently anticipate. At the same time, the boost to domestic
spending from lower energy prices may not fully come to fruition if
households and businesses chose to save a meaningfully greater portion of
the energy tax cut.
•
In terms of the upside risks to growth, the rapid appreciation of the dollar
may already be reflective of divergent central bank policies. In turn, the
pace of dollar appreciation may slow significantly over the coming
quarters, and could even reverse, resulting in less drag on net exports and
domestic production than we currently assume.
•
Another upside risk is the labor market. As the job market continues to
strengthen and the unemployment rate declines meaningfully further,
wage and income growth may rise faster than expected, thus providing
households with even more spending power than we envision.
•
The final upside risk pertains to inflation. The aforementioned potential for
faster wage gains, combined with a more dramatic recovery in energy
prices relative to our projection — possibly the result of less dollar
appreciation, stronger overseas growth and substantially less oil
production — may push headline inflation more quickly back toward the
Fed's 2% target. With respect to all of the aforementioned risks, this is
perhaps the one that financial markets are least prepared for.
Joseph A. LaVorgna,
Brett Ryan,
Aditya Shave,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Figure 8: Goods prices will continue
to fall but this should be offset by
services
%SOY
Cora CPI
.3
2001
2003
2006
2037
2009
2011
2013
—Sensoes
—Goods
Saen
—MIS;
Datithe ALM Rech
2015
Figure 9: A rising hiring rate points
to an acceleration In wage costs
46
54,0y
%
13
38
30
23
15
0 8
2001 2003 2006 2007 1009 2011 2013
—Erni:lowness Cost Index. 201a0 CMS
—JOLTS Prin.) a
058
San* EIS Harr *St
diutacini Bent Marc,
12
11
10
9
8
Figure 10: External balances &
financial forecasts
200;
.2.10.19
/Ole
anal balanca. %a! GDP
40
.20
20
.20
Troci• balance. L/50 bn
476
-532
saes Wince WS GOP
.713
.3 1
.3 3
.41
Curtest account. VS0 bn
407
463
.507
441
Gummi account, %a 00D
.24
.26
.28
.36
C2 23E9 ;X
S
23l0
°Mail
0 12
0.13
0,83
OAS
354 ma
026
0.26
016
13a
uSD par OUR
10)
104
103
098
!Pr per USO
119
121
13.
126
USD pet
I 49
147
IX
133
son Alsreceuestaoneas. 04.970,4 Bersi Restock as ot
&twain 30
Page 47
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
DB-SDNY-0087428
SDNY_GM_00233612
EFTA01385960
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Wire Ref
reflectiveForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.