Case File
efta-01449291DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01449291
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01449291
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Deutsche Bank
Markets Research
United States
Periodical
US Equity Insights
3 reasons not to fear a 3%+ 10yr yield
1600 should be good support even if 10yr treasury yields go a little over 3%
As discussed last week, we are increasingly tolerant of higher treasury yields
given the coincident climb in the euro and oil prices. Treasury yield
normalization poses little threat to S&P EPS provided euro and oil prices prove
resilient. Our view that the chief risk to EPS from higher yields is via FX and
commodity prices is sometimes challenged by investors who see other threats
to EPS from higher interest rates, such as interest expense, or threats to the
S&P's valuation. This note gives a few reasons to discount these concerns.
Interest expense is relatively small and likely overpowered by pension swings
Net interest expense at S&P 500 non-financials is likely under S150bn in 2013,
which after-tax is roughly $10 of EPS. Essentially all of the $2trn in net debt at
non-financials is now long-term debt because cash is more than double short-
term debt and companies have been using more long-term debt in their debt
mix. Usually 10-15% of long-term debt rolls over each year and much of it is
still rolling to lower rates. But, if we assume that 15% of long-term debt rolls to
a rate 100bp higher the hit to 2014 S&P EPS would be -$0.25. If we assume
that the effective interest rate rises 200bp on all non-financial net debt the hit
to S&P EPS is about $3, but if this occurs it would play out over several years.
Pension expense at S&P non-financials is likely to fall more than an increase in
borrowing costs as long-term yields rise, particularly through 2015. The
improved pension funding we expect at 2013 end should provide a -$2 benefit
to S&P EPS in 2014. If yields rise another 100bp at 2014 end it would eliminate
deficits and provide another -$2 S&P EPS boost in 2015 (not in our estimates).
Pension expense declines would likely stop at this point even if yields climbed
higher because of likely shifts in pension asset allocations. This would cause
some pension drag from lower ROA assumptions, but all considered lower
pension expense should offset higher long-term borrowing rates.
Financial earnings will likely benefit from higher treasury yields and eventually
higher short-term interest rates. Thus, we see little threat to overall S&P EPS.
A IS foiwaid PC wouldn't be threatened until 10vr yields were well over 4%
Assuming a fair S&P 500 equity risk premium of 4% (historically 3-4%), it
would likely require a 10yr treasury yield of -5% or a 10yr TIPS yield over 2%
to threaten the fairness of a -'15 forward PE on normalized S&P EPS. However,
such an increase in long-term interest rates would significantly amplify US
fiscal risk. Thus, it is important that any such climb in yields be slow and over
multiple years, while the deficit is further tamed and housing strengthened.
Treasury yields now cooeed the dividend yield, but won't grovy like dividends
Dividend yields like earnings yields represent real yields. Expected inflation
must be added to these observed yields in order to compare them to nominal
interest rates. The 10yr TIPS yield provides a comparable real interest rate,
which at 0.75% suggests that EPS and DPS yields remain very attractive. The
S&P's indicated dividend yield is 2.1% and we expect DPS growth to be -15%
next year and at least 6% thereafter. This suggests an offered long-term
nominal return on S&P ownership over 8% with the ability of that offered
nominal return to adjust for inflation variations over the long term.
23 August 2013
Slr 1
t
Slrair ea
Ju Wang
Strategist
S&P bta) Kir; l ..aimwt3
Price
1660
Next 5%. move Uncertain
2013E
2014E
2015E
Year-end Target
1675
1850
2000
EPS
5100
$115
$120
Target P/E
15.4x
16.1x
16.7x
Current P/E
15.2x
14.4x
13.8x
DPS
$36
$40
$45
Sane' ONOCIPOSInt
Relabel IOC 1,11 I I (W1i dl
Dale
Good signals from yields. euro
16 Aug 2013
and oil
S&P 500 Pensions: End of
31 Jul 2013
cycles?
Multi-year path to PE expansion
14 Jun 2013
How do interest rates affect
31 May 2013
stocks?
SLUG Data* Cant
05 away Strategy Basket,
Bloomberg
Tic km
Tech's Enduring Eight
DBUSTECH
Total Shareholder Return
DBUSBEID I
Stimulator
Dividend Dark Horses
DBUSDFCF
China Cyclists
DBUSCNCY
Sant Onscht Sent
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should
be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should
consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST
CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MICA(P) 054104/2013.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
DB-SDNY-0 104635
SDNY_GM_00250819
EFTA01449291
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
SWIFT/BIC
DBUSBEIDSWIFT/BIC
DBUSCNCYSWIFT/BIC
DBUSDFCFForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.