Case File
efta-01452574DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01452574
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01452574
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
28 January 2014
Brokers. Asset Managers & Exchanges
Alternative Asset Manager Initiation
Earnings profiles in 2014 should also remain supportive, with increasing
realizations generating good sequential distributable earnings growth for at
least the next several quarters. However, longer-term as the economic cycle
matures, fears of a slowdown or recession may percolate and this could
become negative for the stocks if realizations begin to wane, especially if the
Alts' valuations have improved significantly. This does not appear to be on the
horizon for at least 2014 given current expectations for continued growth in
the economy and a relatively benign interest rate backdrop.
Longer-term however (-2017-19), we think it will become difficult to grow
from potentially peak distributable earnings in 2015-16 for much of the group,
given the firms will have likely exhausted a large portion of embedded gains
through realizations. To combat this, the firms will need to maintain the current
healthy pace of fundraising for at least the next 1-2 years and be able to deploy
capital in attractive opportunities, which could become scarcer if capital
markets remain robust. Growing fee-based assets and shifting the business
mix toward traditional asset management will also help to reduce the negative
cyclical impact to DE post the realization cycle.
Other considerations and possible pushback on our generally bullish thesis
(and discussed in more detail in the report) are: 1) higher interest rates will
impede returns given higher financing costs for portfolio companies. 2)
earnings are very difficult to model both in the short- and long-term, hence
reducing conviction in stocks with low forecasting ability, 3) the
corporate/partnership organizational and financial structure is complex &
difficult to become comfortable with, 4) the units and their distribution
structure are prohibitive for some investment portfolios, and 5) the public
floats are low and there is long-term overhang as partners monetize stakes.
Differentiating the companies
As common as the industry trends are for these 5 Alts, the companies are each
quite different in terms of business mix, heritage, management philosophies
and earnings dynamics. Figure 3 shows a brief snapshot of key business mix
differences - we provide a more detailed overview starting on the next page
'Figure 3: Alternative Manager Business Mir. by Reported Segment and Revenue Type
APO
EC(
CG
KKR
Business Line
Ftivate Equity
72%
27%
62%
42%
0%
Credit
27%
14%
0%
0%
93%
Real Estate
0%
46%
0%
0%
0%
Capital Markets
0%
0%
0%
51%
0%
RJblIC Market Strategies
0%
0%
18%
7%
7%
Alternatives Advisory
0%
12%
11%
0%
0%
Real Assets
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
Business Advisory
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
OAK
Average
Pretax Economic Income Mix (2012.148
41%
19%
16%
12%
5%
5%
1%
1%
Revenue Type
Revenue Mix by Type (2012.14E)
Average
Fees
34%
42%
46%
31%
48%
40%
Carried Merest & hcentives
61%
48%
52%
41%
43%
49%
Principal & other income
5%
9%
2%
28%
9%
11%
Nett &a
mangy repomf *eras% Pus ears
me/ /a Ours is n .r.'t
the es* n and
ear
, / 0-4,c "When nen'ea, w au
San, Cmwrr mrr. al D.ScA• aw*
Page 6
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
DB-SDNY-0 109692
SDNY_GM_00255876
EFTA01452574
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.