Case File
efta-01452585DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01452585
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01452585
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
28 January 2014
Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges
Alternative Asset Manager Initiation
Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18
shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit
basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts
are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our
estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution
forecasts are generally above Consensus. This above-Consensus view on
distributions forms our more optimistic view on the Alt space - to the extent
we are correct, and we think upside surprises in distributable earnings over the
coming quarters will be a positive catalyst for valuation improvement.
[Figure IS: DB Forecasts for ENI per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus
400Y2013
2014
2016
Alts
DB
Cons.
%diff
DB
Cons.
%diff
APO
$0.82
$0.80
1.9%
$2.50
53.04
-17.7%
BX
30.84
5082
2.3%
$3.09
$2.98
3.7%
CG
$0.93
$0.87
6.8%
$2.70
33.17
-14.8%
KKR
$0.96
$0.89
8.4%
52.33
$2.52
-7.5%
OAK
31.19
$1.15
3.6%
$4.36
$4.80
-9.2%
Median
3.6%
-9.2%
Sono Thomson Aaron &be O*.eselx Ban
'Figure 19: DB Forecasts for Distribution per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus
40CY2013
2014
Alts
DB
Cons.
%diff
C8
Cons.
%diff
APO
$0.80
30.79
1.4%
33.06
$2.48
23.3%
BX
$0.47
50.45
3.7%
$1.95
$1.78
9.3%
CG
$1.20
$1.17
2.8%
$2.22
$2.03
9.3%
KKR
$0.39
30.39
-0.5%
31.58
$1.44
10.0%
OAK
$0.91
50.92
-0.8%
$3.78
$3.75
0.9%
Median
1.4%
9.3%
Saga ?Mown Arian neewtm Sort
Our valuation methodology
While valuation methodologies using sum of the parts or DCF models can be
intellectually rigorous, we think a more simplified PIE approach on distributable
earnings (DE) will end up being a better indicator of the Ails' unit price
performance over time. Our approach works in the following steps:
•
Observe each of the Alts forward P/E on Consensus (ENI) over the past
12 months and last two years and compare to the S&P 500 to derive a
relative PIE;
•
Assess to what extent each Alts' relative PIE will improve or worsen
(or stay the same) over the next 12 months vs. the prior I2-months,
based on the variety of fundamental factors outlined in this report;
Derive a target forward P/E for the S&P 500 12 months from now,
which is 14.9x (based on DB equity strategy forecast for S&P 2015
EPS of $125 and S&P ending prices of 1850 yearend 2014 and 2000
yearend 2015. which implies 1863 12-months from this report);
•
Multiply our target relative PIE to derive a target absolute PIE;
Apply this absolute P/E on our 2015 DE forecasts to derive where the
units will trade on 1-year forward distributable earnings 12-months
from now; hence where the units will trade on 2015 DE in Jan-2015.
DB
Cons.
%diff
$2.32
$3.08
-24.8%
53.24
$3.42
-5.4%
$2.89
$3.41
-15.2%
$2.33
$2.77
-15.8%
$4.67
$4.83
-3.4%
.15.2%
2016
DB
Cons.
%diff
$2.56
$2.13
20.3%
$2.46
$2.00
22.8%
$2.70
$2.35
15.1%
51.76
$1.43
23.1%
$3.98
$3.79
5.1%
20.3%
Page 20
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
DB-SDNY-0109706
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00255890
EFTA01452585
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.