Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01452585DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01452585

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01452585
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
28 January 2014 Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges Alternative Asset Manager Initiation Figures 18 and 19 compare our estimates vs. Consensus, with Figure 18 shown on an ENI per unit basis, and Figure 19 shown on a distribution per unit basis (comparable to dividend per share forecasts, as Consensus DE forecasts are not readily available with a sizeable population). The Figures show our estimates for ENI are generally below Consensus, while our distribution forecasts are generally above Consensus. This above-Consensus view on distributions forms our more optimistic view on the Alt space - to the extent we are correct, and we think upside surprises in distributable earnings over the coming quarters will be a positive catalyst for valuation improvement. [Figure IS: DB Forecasts for ENI per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus 400Y2013 2014 2016 Alts DB Cons. %diff DB Cons. %diff APO $0.82 $0.80 1.9% $2.50 53.04 -17.7% BX 30.84 5082 2.3% $3.09 $2.98 3.7% CG $0.93 $0.87 6.8% $2.70 33.17 -14.8% KKR $0.96 $0.89 8.4% 52.33 $2.52 -7.5% OAK 31.19 $1.15 3.6% $4.36 $4.80 -9.2% Median 3.6% -9.2% Sono Thomson Aaron &be O*.eselx Ban 'Figure 19: DB Forecasts for Distribution per unit for the Alts vs. Consensus 40CY2013 2014 Alts DB Cons. %diff C8 Cons. %diff APO $0.80 30.79 1.4% 33.06 $2.48 23.3% BX $0.47 50.45 3.7% $1.95 $1.78 9.3% CG $1.20 $1.17 2.8% $2.22 $2.03 9.3% KKR $0.39 30.39 -0.5% 31.58 $1.44 10.0% OAK $0.91 50.92 -0.8% $3.78 $3.75 0.9% Median 1.4% 9.3% Saga ?Mown Arian neewtm Sort Our valuation methodology While valuation methodologies using sum of the parts or DCF models can be intellectually rigorous, we think a more simplified PIE approach on distributable earnings (DE) will end up being a better indicator of the Ails' unit price performance over time. Our approach works in the following steps: Observe each of the Alts forward P/E on Consensus (ENI) over the past 12 months and last two years and compare to the S&P 500 to derive a relative PIE; Assess to what extent each Alts' relative PIE will improve or worsen (or stay the same) over the next 12 months vs. the prior I2-months, based on the variety of fundamental factors outlined in this report; Derive a target forward P/E for the S&P 500 12 months from now, which is 14.9x (based on DB equity strategy forecast for S&P 2015 EPS of $125 and S&P ending prices of 1850 yearend 2014 and 2000 yearend 2015. which implies 1863 12-months from this report); Multiply our target relative PIE to derive a target absolute PIE; Apply this absolute P/E on our 2015 DE forecasts to derive where the units will trade on 1-year forward distributable earnings 12-months from now; hence where the units will trade on 2015 DE in Jan-2015. DB Cons. %diff $2.32 $3.08 -24.8% 53.24 $3.42 -5.4% $2.89 $3.41 -15.2% $2.33 $2.77 -15.8% $4.67 $4.83 -3.4% .15.2% 2016 DB Cons. %diff $2.56 $2.13 20.3% $2.46 $2.00 22.8% $2.70 $2.35 15.1% 51.76 $1.43 23.1% $3.98 $3.79 5.1% 20.3% Page 20 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0109706 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00255890 EFTA01452585

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.