Case File
efta-01454214DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01454214
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01454214
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Better Predictors
Compare tax drag to the tax exemption multiple (TEM) and the
tax deferral multiple (TDM)
Dillerecxe in
Value Atter
10 Yeas
(Tai-Itempt
lac DINJ
TEM
Portiolm)
fRi
INIererice in
Value Atter
20 Years
iTax-belated
Panora)
Asset Class I
Asset Class 2
1.28%
19
39.9 mimics
0,35
111%
2*
124.6 million
I.9!
119./million
33.6 million
Note Assumes an atlal :doe $10
are captal pats tai meteams oraant 1,4iitomt
exclude mattegeftent lees
— Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management
the most logical choice for use in private placement
portfolios.
Which asset classes could be more powerful in a
private placement portfolio? Emerging market equities
have, by far, the most utility. The difference in the value
of a dollar invested in that asset class in a private place-
ment (versus taxable) portfolio over 20 years is more than
three times the difference of a dollar invested in emerging
market bonds, for example. The difference in the value
of a dollar invested in developed market equities in a
private placement (versus taxable) portfolio is anywhere
from 1.5 to 2.5 times greater than one dollar invested in
emerging market bonds. The combination of expected
return, turnover and tax rate makes all the difference.
It's important to note that these arc our long-term
asset class assumptions and are based on index
returns. Actual returns might differ depending on the
particular manager. Moreover, they reflect Deutsche
Asset & Wealth Management's views. With the help of a
good advisor, an investor can combine their own views
and the characteristics of their selected managers, to cre-
ate a custom set of tax deferral metrics.
Once an investor has determined what percentage
of their overall portfolio they'd like to place in private
placement. and his advisor has calculated the tax defer-
ral metrics for each available asset class, the investor
and advisor still need to determine which asset classes
should be placed in the private placement portfolio and
which should remain in the taxable portfolio: the so-
called "asset location" strategy.
One asset location strategy that's per-
haps the easiest to execute, is simply to
mirror the target taxable allocation in
the private placement portfolio, with
minor adjustments to optimize for a
tax-free structure. We'll call this the
'mirror strategy? The results are a tax-
able portfolio and a private placement
portfolio that are nearly identical from
an asset allocation perspective. This
method offers the advantage of limiting
the administrative burden that arises
when the faster tax deferred growth
(and often higher growth asset classes)
in the private placement portfolio cause
the asset classes to become out of bal-
ance. Because the allocations are near-identical, an
investor needn't worry about reallocating between
the private placement and taxable pools but only
within each of the pools separately. A disadvantage of
this method is that it inhibits an investor from taking
advantage of the superior tax deferral benefit of cer-
tain asset classes by concentrating them in the private
placement portfolio. "Asset Allocation Advantage, "
p. x, demonstrates the effect of this disadvantage over
time.
The most potent approach is to locate in private
placement portfolios only the asset classes with the high-
est TEM. If the client views the assets in both the taxable
and private placement pools as a single portfolio, this
approach has a distinct disadvantage: the considerable
administrative burden of reallocating between the pri-
vate placement and taxable pools. This process is a very
manual one and, at times, becomes impossible to fully
execute without changing the overall allocation.
Another approach is to consider the private place-
ment portfolio as distinct from a broadly diversified
asset allocation. This "tactical" portfolio would con-
sist of certain "high conviction' asset classes that are
also best suited to the benefits of private placement.
The goal of this pool would be absolute returns rather
than risk-adjusted returns. In this way, TEM is an excel-
lent metric to determine which asset classes from the
high conviction set offer the greatest benefit from tax
deferral or tax-exemption.
22
TRUSTS & ESTATES / trustsandestates.com
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
JUNE 2014
DB-SDNY-0112197
SDNY_GM_00258381
EFTA01454214
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
trustsandestates.comForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.