Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01459548DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01459548

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01459548
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
CIO View Special ArruincnEtPtcoirabruary2016 4 Unexpectedly resilient U.S. production Arguably the most surprising factor in this cycle has been the resilience of U.S. production in the face of collapsing oil prices. Many of the larger, traditional oil companies in the United States and elsewhere have shelved big investment projects, such as expensive deep-sea drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. However, such projects take years to realize and it takes equally long for lower investment to result in tower supply. Instead, the swing in output was expected to come from shale-oil production. Shale rigs aro quick to drill and have typically seen production decline by 50% or more within the first year. This means shale production can adjust fairly quickly, simply by not replacing existing wells. Moreover, as with conventional wells, most of the costs involve upfront capital expenditure, rather than operating expenses. Sure enough, shale producers have cut investment to approximately $60bn in 2015, well below the $100bn or so spent in 2014. Unexpectedly, however, this proved enough to keep shale production close to steady for the year after peaking in early 2015. The two graphs below show the dynamics of shale-oil. The Permian basin, spanning western Texas and southeastern New Mexico, is currently the only major U.S. region with growing production. Current estimates suggest that output from legacy wells declines by 84,000b/d. So, to generate 5,000b/d in growth would require additional 89,000bM of production from new wells. As a result of the astonishing productivity gains, one rig now produces more than 400b/d, in 2012 that number was only 100b/d. 6)) SOO 4141 241 1:,) tare ma repel le" PO Pei 4/4411..r• Nre; 2013 2011 :0r 231f. 2)11/7 2))6 2Y.9 2)1* 2011 21)12 X-) 5O) IP) ihrascrd fed thanaod ?Al • YoUl prey-Webb, !i:11 1/6,4 ■ lonacyorcaglon change tight ail; .10 mo 2cce mm mm 0!% 2-312 2013 mu mm )010 khorm,ry; .coeer IV .04r; 7444/i I Jarery )016 Sport-Li 1) Erw0y iftt:ernzbbn ted4a4321,4•4 Creno Prodtwity /kyr, Jw,:xsy 2,0 Past performance is not indicative of future returns. No assurance can be given that any forecast, investment objectives and / or expected returns will be achieved. Allocations are subject to change without notice. Forecasts are based on assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models that may prove to be incorrect. Source: Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management Investment GmbH, as of 02/2016 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0120030 SDNY_GM_00266214 EFTA01459548

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.