Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01459640DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01459640

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01459640
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Strategy Flashcard Strategy Flashcard 5&P 500 to reach 2200 by 2O16 end ono long expansionary cycle of moderate growth 2016 end target: 2200 2017 end target: 2400 Div Yld: 2% 2014A 2015E 2016E Quarterly EPS EPS $118 $118 $118 1Q14A $28.00 1C11.5A $28.60 PE on yearend S&P targets 17.4 17.3 18.6 2Q14A $29.75 2Q15A $30.10 DPS $38 $41 $43 3Q14A $30.00 3Q1SA $30.00 EPS/DPS growth 6%/6% 0%/7% 0%/S% 4014A $30.25 4Q1SE $29.25 Market strategy and tactks: Lower S&P returns than history likely, but still decent and few alternatives - stay involved, buy on dips Consider lesson of 2014-2015: Interest rates stayed very low despite tighter labor market and initial Fed hike Next 5%+ move is likely: Up Risk of near-term correction: Diminished "5&P PE stands on the shoulders of bonds." Thematic and sector strategy: Tilt toward: 1) Secular Growth Sectors - industries with strong sales growth in the middle of economic cycles 2) Sales Growth near 5%- industries not dependent on margin expansion to drive 5%+ EPS growth 3) High ROE or long competitive advantage - ability to defend ROE/margins amidst low interest rates 4) Dividend Growth - stocks with ability to significantly raise dividend payout ratios 5) Debt Capacity - companies that can issue cheap debt for acquisitions and share buybacks Tilt away from: 1) Consumer companies w/tired brands or facing tough competition (seek unique products/experiences) 2) Smaller cap cyclical plays which are still expensive, prefer big-cap banks and select retailers 3) Commodity and industrial capital goods producers, prefer Transports Reasons to still buy stocks: 1) - 2% US GDP likely in 2016 2) S&P EPS steady/higher despite $/oil 3) PEs justifiable and been higher 4) Bond yields are nil after inflation Dare to ask: Why not 2500+ S&P cycle-high? 2500+ r. 18x 2018E EPS $140-145 5&P 500 avg. trailing 4qtr PE: 1960-2014 16.0 1985-2014 17.6 1995-2014 18.6 2005-2014 15.9 Sectors/Industries: Health Care, Tech Health Care, Tech, Consumer Disc. Tech, Health Care, some Consumer Big Banks, Mega-cap Tech Tech, Health Care, some Consumer Staples Be selective and valuation mindful Energy, Industrial Capital Goods Risks: - US tax on foreign profits, whether repatriated or not, threatens large multinationals and would cause margin contraction • EM economy weakness that causes a steep decline in commodity prices, especially oil, and threatens US exports and investment spending - A surge in long-term interest rates or any global economic shock would threaten our constructive view on the S&P for 2016 CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0120208 SDNY_GM_00266392 EFTA01459640

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.