Case File
efta-01459659DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01459659
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01459659
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
CIO View Special
ilmt.4.
5:4•Ore Faculty 2016
13
One source of systemic risk could, of course, he the banking sector. At this stage,
this looks very unlikely. U.S. banking stocks have been hammered in recent weeks.
In January 2016 alone the sector is down 15%. This probably reflects broader
capital-market turmoil more than the falling oil price. Direct exposure to the U.S.
energy sector looks limited, typically to under 3% of U.S. bank loans. Admittedly,
ratios are higher for some of the smaller regional banks. But, banks have already
been building up loan-loss provisions on their lending to the energy sector for the
last several quarters. This is not a big unknown, in other words. U.S. bank balance
sheets are also starting from a stronger position than before previous loan-loss
cycles. It remains too early to invest in oil companies and energy-related stocks
more broadly.
"Even if oil prices double, these levels would still be a nightmare for oil companies",
explains Marco Scherer, our Energy Equities Expert at Deutsche AM.
For decades, investors could count on oil majors to steadily increase dividends.
Oil majors even increased their cash returns as they boosted capital expenditure
(capex) (thereby reducing free cash flows (FCF)). Now the majors are struggling just
to keep dividends stable. Already, some of them have to revert to paper dividends in
order to do so. For the time being, disposals, cost savings and increasing debt levels
have helped pay for the dividend. Industry guidance suggests that, in 2017, it would
take an oil price of $60/b to cover dividend with free cash flow. At current oil prices,
the capacity of oil companies to maintain dividends looks increasingly endangered.
Further falls in the oil price would make matters worse. "At $15, both equity and
debt instruments with any oil exposure would suffer significant weakness all around
the world. Dividend payments and debt service would be unsustainable for vast
parts of the sector. The number of defaults would increase, while oil supply would
decrease. Despite being a very negative scenario in the short term, it would spur
healthy developments in the industry for the medium term.", Marco Scherer notes.
Oil price, dividends and free cash flows of
MSCI World Energy Index constituents
1.1:44‘1. 2C11
• WY! Cr uric otl
• Omclaxx`
150 0111/4tv Cent Flow'
I00
50
.50
2012
.1:13
2011
MSCI rno Wolf Enegy mdm Isa 17 MOA: !•
Edet•fstiog0.4. 2011 e
5enrcas •coroleo0 Fiwret. P
1.)cutteiko Myr, Vec,vilikisswio.r.sitl.oastr.an
not
Capital expenditure and net debt/EBITDA of
MSCI World Energy Index constituents
• MSC1 Wocki Immo :Ensue .-Cnikcil Erpondizteen
Rya'
• N.: W./ WiTOA 1.111 inn!. crab'
0 0
(04-014
Ot.0014
02147:14
01/20I5
gnaws
49,201'3
011201,5
MSCI The Wpkl Fontgy Into; LW a 4µt 12 moot'µ
Solaro: rece:c.! Relaxes System, Inc. n of 1/1810
Past performance is not indicative of future returns. No assurance can be given that any forecast, investment objectives
and / or expected returns will be achieved. Allocations are subject to change without notice. Forecasts are based on
assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models that may prove to be incorrect. Source: Deutsche Asset &
Wealth Management Investment GmbH, as of 02/2016
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)
CONFIDENTIAL
DB-SDNY-0120251
SDNY_GM_00266435
EFTA01459659
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.