Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01459663DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01459663

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01459663
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
CIO View Special Imagining a world with oil at $15 per barrel Arstaw,Eg.tteni ECtruirV ane le 2.c. Hard landing in China: China's problems turn out to 1)0 much deeper than official figures suggest. The yuan devalues in a disorderly fashion. Major Chinese companies default on their foreign-currency debt. Chinese domestic spending collapses, resulting in oil imports actually shrinking, rather than just slowing. Lower Chinese growth drags down oil demand in other emerging markets. Likelihood Unlikely Comment We continue to think that China's problems are significant but solvable in an orderly enough fashion to limit the impact on the rest of the world. China is still expected to cause just under 30% of global oil-demand growth in 2016, or about 0.3-0.4mb/d. For oil demand to actually shrink, China would need to experience a very hard landing and, probably, a sharp currency devaluation (as a result of which the oil price in yuan would fall less than when measured in U.S. dollars). If China were to fall off a cliff, oil would probably be only one of many worries for the global economy. The impact on developed-market consumer prices would most probably be deflationary and there could he real risks of deflation spreading. Emerging markets would be among the first to suffer. To sum up the conclusions from these hypothetical scenarios Low oil prices might be a positive development (if mainly caused by too much supply) or a negative development (if reflecting shrinking demand in parts of the world) for much of the world economy. The impact on capital markets would heavily depend on how monetary policy responds. A hard landing, in China or a U.S. recession would certainly warrant a response but may also put the limits of what monetary policy can do into sharp focus. Perhaps, the biggest challenge for both central bankers and investors is that an average oil price of around $15/b in 2016 would not be the end of the story. Conventional oil production would probably be depressed for several years to come. In all likelihood, this would pave the way for a lasting oil-price recovery. Before too long, the result might wel€ be the sort of oil shock we have long been used to - where sharp rises of oil prices cause pain among consumers around the world, These scenarios are based on assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models or analysis which may prove to be incorrect. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. No assurance can be given that any forecast, investment objectives and / or expected returns will be achieved. Allocations are subject to change without notice. Forecasts are based on assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models that may prove to be incorrect. Source: Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management Investment GmbH, as of 02/2016 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) CONFIDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0 120256 SDNY_GM_00266440 EFTA01459663

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflecting

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.