Case File
efta-01898089DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01898089
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01898089
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
Richard Kahn
From:
Jeffrey Epstei
Sent:
Sat 4/13/2013 1:28:26 AM
Subject: Fwd:
Forwarded mcssa e
From: Farkas, Andrew L.
Date: Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:14 PM
Subject: Re:
To: "[email protected]" <jecvacationagmail.com>
I don't feel awkward in the slightest. I think your people are interpreting what they see in a manner that
is best for their perspective and to cover their asses. I think they're dead wrong.
None of the people responsible for this transaction 5 years ago are still at IGY nor have they been for
many years. This was not a situation in which your investment was solicited. It was something on which
you insisted if you recall. I was trying to accommodate your desire to own 50% of the asset personally
because of the nexus to La It was difficult to implement at the time because it was a related party
transaction, would be seen by everyone, and thus every benefit of the doubt had to be given to IGY in
which you and I both represented investors. The transaction, as I understand it, was a fixed price
contract for a 50% interest. I did not negotiate the price, the contract or anything else. I have absolutely
no idea how the number was arrived at and by whom. On either side. I don't know who did the deal for
you either. But my recollection is that you were clear with me that you wanted to own half of it and I
told people to see to it. Period. It was a 50/50 deal on the real estate and IGY and was to have retained
all of the other rights and benefits it would have had if you had never been admitted. IGY is a branding,
management, leasing and fee based company. To the best of my understanding that is what was done.
My sense is that your team is trying now as hard as possible to demonstrate that something untoward
happened. And its simply not true. The deal that was struck by those responsible for striking the deal
(obviously not you or me) is the deal that was struck and the audits of the past 5 years seem to bear that
out.
If it is your desire to continue to have your folks dig through this, then please do so. There is nothing to
find, jeffery. I have tried to show you that I want to try to make you feel better about a deal that in
retrospect you seem to think was wrong. But I can't fix the past. I have been trying to show you my love
and respect for you by offering to address the future. But it does not seem adequate. I am at a loss now
for what to do.
Your people struck a deal with IGY 5 or 6 years ago. It was what it was. I can't undo it. I'm upset that
you're upset. But I can't seem to fix that either. So I surrender. Do what you think you need to do. I can't
keep beating my management to reconstruct ancient history. They feel shitty that they are being treated
as if they have done something wrong or have worked to obfuscate things when, in fact, they have been
working hard to manage a difficult asset in a difficult environment. And they have done a solid job in a
crappy market with an underperforming and aging asset.
I made a couple of proposals to you. Ultimately I will get criticized by shareholders, I'm sure, for doing
EFTA_R1_00324794
EFTA01898089
even that which I have proposed to do, but, as I said, I love you, I'm sorry you're not happy, and I want to
put it as right as I can given the circumstances. Few people in the world will say and do that for those
they love, but I will. That said, given the nature of the deal, the history and the clarity of the
documentation, I am hamstrung. If you want to sue IGY, then just do it. I'll have to deal with it when it
comes.
What does suck for me, however, is that I feel that you don't trust or believe me and while your words
don't say it everything else does. That hurts.
I will do what I can for the asset, with the financing and with the physical plant.
I am in Napa with Sandi, William Lauder and his closest friends for his birthday. We can talk next week,
but I'm telling you that you are reading what you were sent incorrectly and inferring the worst in
everything you see here. When you decide what you want me to do, you can tell me. If I can
appropriately do it, I will. But I'm out of ideas.
Xoxo ALF
From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacationOgmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 06:45 PM
To: Farkas, Andrew L.
Subject:
I just glanced at the summary, it appears, that an acquistion fee, of 250 was charged then
according the financials a gain on the sale to me of 250 k.? for my 50
- foot note and then
750 paid to an affiliate? for the borrowing prior to my closing, . with no revenue offset.? but my
guys will review over the weekend, please don't feel awkward, as i know you did not oversee
this, and i never looked, If you recall we were going to be 5050 from the start. ?
************
**** *******************
*******************
*****
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacationfibgmail.com and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
This message, and any attachments hereto, is confidential and intended exclusively for the use
EFTA_R1_00324795
EFTA01898090
of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This communication may contain information
that is confidential, proprietary, privileged, subject to a confidentiality and/or non-disclosure
agreement, or otherwise exempt or protected from disclosure (either by contract or under
applicable law). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that printing,
retaining, reproducing, copying, disclosing, disseminating or using this message or any
information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the message
(including any attachments) and any copies in their entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy
format. Nothing contained in this e-mail shall be considered a legally binding agreement,
amendment or modification of any agreement with Island Capital Group LLC or any of its
affiliates, each of which requires a fully executed agreement to be received by Island Capital
Group LLC or such affiliate.
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by c-mail to jet). acation6i_gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00324796
EFTA01898091
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01936434
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01975151
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01765224
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02468008
4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02125460
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02486679
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.