Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01926788DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01926788

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01926788
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey EMeevacationagmail.comj From: Ada Clapp Sent Thur 5/22/2014 8:02:29 PM Subject: RE: Annuity Amounts in Estate Planning OVerview Thanks! From: jeffrey E. Imailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 20144:17 PM To: Ada Clapp Subject: Re: Annuity Amounts in Estate Planning OVerview Good catch On Tuesday, May 20, 2014, Ada Clapp e > wrote: Jeffrey, As a follow up to our meeting yesterday, I spoke with UST about the annuity calculations included in the Estate Planning Overview. They had not, in fact, revised the numbers to include the passage of time since the last Overview they prepared. In addition, they used a straight present value calculation based on the life expectancies listed in IRS Table 2000CM. The IRS mortality table they used is the correct table to use when valuing annuities for gift and estate tax purposes for dates after May 1, 1999. However, it is a "unisex" table that does not take gender into account when ascertaining life expectancy. For that reason, certain adjustments to that table are suggested to more accurately reflect sex-based mortality factors (i.e., to reduce a woman's age by 4 years and to increase a man's age by 2 years). Accordingly, Judy's age should be reduced to 62, which results in a 20-year life expectancy, and Jon's age should be increased to 63 (from age 61), which results in a 19-year life expectancy. I asked UST to re-run the calculations on that basis. The result is a very small difference in the cost of the two annuities. I will have the bank input these revisions, as well as those we discussed at our meeting, and send you another draft. Once you approve of the draft and I get the revised values of Black Family Partners showing the AGM stock at $25 and $30 per share (and factoring in the TRA EFTA_M_00373452 EFTA01926788 adjustment you discussed), I will have UST run the two additional illustrations you requsted. Since the current Overview is based on a stock price of $27.92, I assume that will suffice for your $28/share illustration. Correct? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to ice\ acation inail.coin, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00373453 EFTA01926789

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.