Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-01950291DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA01950291

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01950291
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey Epstein[jeevacation©gmail.com] From: "Uber NYC" <[email protected]> on behalf of Uber NYC <[email protected]> Sent: Wed 11/13/20134:12:39 PM Subject: Introducing lower New Jersey rates! Title: Introducing lower New Jersey rates! USER NYC Hey Jeffrey, Uber has been moving people around New York City since 2011, but going to and from New Jersey hasn't always been as easy. We think it's time to bridge (and tunnel) the gap. ;) Effective today, we're lowering flat rates to from Manhattan to Newark Liberty International Airport, lowering the New Jersey surcharge, and introducing new rates for uberX trips beginning in New Jersey. NEW PRICING Lower flat rates between Manhattan and Newark Airport EFTA_R1_00416270 EFTA01950291 New Jersey surcharge We've lowered the New Jersey surcharge to $20. This surcharge will be added to all trips that cross between New Jersey and New York (except trips between Manhattan and EWR) to cover tolls and the driver's return trip. Please note that New Jersey Turnpike tolls will be additional and are not included in the surcharge. New Jersey uberX rates WHAT IS uberX? In New Jersey, uberX includes ridesharing, offering the Uber reliability you're used to with prices cheaper than a New Jersey taxi. Drivers on uberX have mid-range or hybrid vehicles in a variety of colors and styles, with seating for up to four people. QUESTIONS? Visit our bloq where you can also read about our New Jersey uberX "Rider Zero" Deron Williams! EFTA_R1_00416271 EFTA01950292 -Team Uber NYC Unsubscribe!Email Preferences 'View this email online 'Nara Skeet es. San if antSCO CA 94105 EFTA_R1_00416272 EFTA01950293

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.