Case File
efta-01959019DOJ Data Set 10OtherEFTA01959019
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-01959019
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
Michael Wolff
From:
Jeffrey Epstein
Sent
Wed 8/28/2013 7:12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Following up
lets meet when you are back. thanks,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Michael Wolff
wrote:
Here's what I am thinking about...
The goal is to shift the story--to reintroduce you.
If I write from the point of view of knowing you, than that removes the notion that there's an
examination or investigation or, implicitly, something negative involved with you getting
press. Quite the opposite, the bias is that there is something positive--and unexpected. So, we
get to address and defuse all the issues that might otherwise be the subject of an expose,
without making them the point.
The only way someone else could have a pretext to write about you is because of scandal or now
Gate's relationship to you and your relationship to scandal.
But if I write about you as a friend, then the justification has to be that there is another
dimension to the story. Also, if I do it, other people will tend not to do it, because the story
has been claimed, and I'm a prominent enough voice that mostly other writers won't want to
follow me.
I think the best way to approach it is on three different levels:
a) Why Gates would find you so interesting and valuable--obviously talk to Gates about this;
b) My friendship with you—how we met; ten years of knowing you; our chats; and the ways in
which that shows you to be inherently unique and interesting;
c) Your troubles--but only as a foreign counterpoint to what makes you unique and interesting
and valuable to Gates (otherwise, what makes you unique gets written about as the weird
counterpoint to the troubles, which become the baseline).
I would still say if you are happy with the way things are, then no attention is the best attention;
but if you want to continue with Gates, then you do have to get out in front.
For me, it would be easy to do this and enjoyable. And for you this is a particularly
advantageous approach--i.e. a well positioned friend with (if I do say so) a particularly deft
touch and platform to write about anything he wants to write about.
Thoughts? BTW, I am back in New York on September 7. m
EFTA_R1_00431735
EFTA01959019
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return c-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00431736
EFTA01959020
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.