EFTA02355601

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 2:12 AM To: effre E. Cc: Subject: RE: Fwd: We were very pleased that you could stop by — on your way to Senegal! That's impressive. Valeria enjoyed it very much as well, and it seemed to have a good effect. She was a lot better today. We even went out for a walk for the first time. Don't entirely follow what you say below. About Al, the field has two parts. One is basically engineering: let's construct a driverless car, a robot that can clean the house, etc. The other is basically science: let's try to discover how the human mind works, adopting a standard procedure of constructing models, and since we're thinking of the mind as basically a computational system, computational models. Normal science. I have never seen any difference between the kind of work that I do — and Bob, and quite a few others — and the second kind of AI, which has pretty much withered on the vine as resources are poured into the first kind — which is doubtless of considerable importance, as engineering generally is. So it's not really clear to me what is at stake. Noam From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 3:55 PM To Subject: Fwd: Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:54 AM Subject: To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» EFTA_R1_01339093 EFTA02355601 thank you for hosting me last night I could not pass up the opportunity to see you both, but thought it prudent not to strain Valeria's time.. ( good juice) My thinking is as follows. I suggest that artificial intelligence and common sense are the computational models. but computation does not need language. It appears along the inverse function ie questions ? what if? then you need a language that has infinite possible configurations.. even a dog knows what happens if i throw the ball, only human thought asks what if , no gravity, what if, ball filled with helium etc. I think it is Al to the the power of minus 1. so if chemical feedback loops , began to anticipate their reactions to many previously unsearched configurations. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01339094 EFTA02355602