Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02428058DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02428058

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02428058
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey Epsteinfleevacation©gmail.com] From: Rosa M da Silva Sent: Wed 3/31/2010 9:12:38 PM Subject: FW: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW From: Katherine A Childress Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:40 PM To: Rosa M da Silva Cc: Peter L Scher Subject: Fw: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW From: Stephen M Cutler To: Kathryn McCulloch; Katherine A Childress; Nina O Shenker; Diane M. Genova Sent: Fri Mar 19 13:22:28 2010 Subject: RE: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW Don't we also want to make sure we're on an equal footing w Goldman/MS, so that on p. 478 line 8 and on p. 480 line 9, we add something like, "and any company w more than $50 bn in assets that was a BHC and received TARP funding"? P 478, line 10 has to be revised to say that any regulation, restriction or prohibition (instead of just prohibition) adopted pursuant to (instead of under) this subsection . . . . P 486 line 22: instead of saying may issue regs, which SHALL reflect any recommendations or modifications made by the Council, I'd say which "CONSIDER any recommendations or modifications made by the Council. . . ." From: Kathryn McCulloch Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 12:30 PM To: Katherine A Childress; Nina O Shenker; Diane M. Genova Cc: Stephen M Cutler Subject: RE: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW EFTA_R1_01497390 EFTA02428058 The prohibition on entering into any covered transactions with funds that are managed or advised by us is not specifically subject to the study but the provision requiring the study still provides that the Council make recommendations on the implementation of all the provisions, including that one, and that the banking agencies "may" issue final regs implementing that section, so I am not sure it specifically needs to refer to the study. If we wanted to cover it specifically we could make the following changes p 481 line 18 insert before "An insured" "Subject to the recommendations and modifications of the Council under subsection (g), p 482 line 1 insert after "may" "be restricted or prohibited from entering" and strike "not enter" From: Katherine A Childress Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 12:06 PM To: Kathryn McCulloch; Nina O Shenker; Diane M. Genova Cc: Stephen M Cutler Subject: Re: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW Already asked! Thanks, Kathy. I was just trying to make sure it was drafted properly because he wrote it at 1 in the morning. Thanks for checking. From: Kathryn McCulloch To: Katherine A Childress; Nina O Shenker; Diane M. Genova Sent: Fri Mar 19 12:04:50 2010 Subject: RE: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW It just shifts the presumption slightly so that the relevant banking agencies "may" "regulate, restrict or prohibit" instead of "shall" "prohibit". Could you get in Diane's amendment on who it applies to, to include the Hotel California firms? EFTA_R1_01497391 EFTA02428059 From: Katherine A Childress Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:14 AM To: Nina O Shenker; Diane M. Genova; Kathryn McCulloch Subject: VOLCKER AMENDMENT -PLEASE REVIEW Importance: High This is what the Warner office is considering filing. The deadline today is 2 so I need immediate turnaround from you, sorry. This is not the strong language we would like to see but is what they think they could credibly offer in Committee and get votes for from the D side. From: Steinwald, Nathan (Warner) warner.senate.gov] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 10:5 To: Katherine A Childress Page 477, line 22, strike "Prohibition" and replace with "Regulation, Restriction or Prohibition" Page 478, line 2, strike "shall" and replace with "may" Line 3, after "jointly" insert "regulate, restrict or" Line 10, after "The" insert "regulations, restrictions or" Page 479, Line 18, strike "prohibition" and replace with "regulation, restrictions or prohibition" Line 22, strike "prohibition" and replace with "Regulation, Restriction or Prohibition" Page 480, line 2, strike "shall" and replace with "may" Line 4, at the start insert "regulate, restrict or" and following prohibit insert "sponsoring or investing in a hedge fund or a private equity fund by" Line 9 end the sentence following "company" and strike ", from sponsoring or investing" Line 10, strike. Line 16, insert "regulations, " before "prohibitions" Page 486, line 17, following "(1)" strike the remainder as well as line 18 EFTA_R1_0 1497392 EFTA02428060 Line 20, strike "shall" and replace with "may" Page 487, line I, strike "shall" and replace with "may" EFTA_R1_0 1497393 EFTA02428061

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domaingmail.com
Domainwarner.senate.gov
Phone2428058
Phone2428059
Phone2428060
Phone2428061

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.