Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02447283DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02447283

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02447283
Pages
8
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:54 AM To: Jeff Epstein Subject: Fw: thought see below 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> Jiyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing <http://chopra.com> =/div> For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com <http://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/> <=span> From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:52 AM To: Rudolph Tanzi Cc: Subject: Re: thought DNA , bacteria, brain --anything humans have given names to are hu=an constructs --the entire universe including what we call "God"=-is human construct. Reality is awareness and its excitations experienced =s observer and observed - classification and description into form and phenomena are human constucts-products of language--linguist=c, mathematical, scientific --useful but not fundamental EFTA_R1_01544244 EFTA02447283 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Chopra Foundation=/a> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> liyo <http://jiyo.com> Chopra Center for Wellbeing chttp://chopra.com> =/div> For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com chttp://=adicalbeauty.com/> <http:=/radicalbeauty.com/> <=span> From: Rudolph Tanzi Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:50:29 PM To: Deepak Chopra Cc: Subject: Re: thought Every universe of every being is their own construct. Those with simil=r DNA agree most on the construct. The universe of a bacterium in a dish i= much difference than ours, which is close to that of our dog while the ba=terium's is closer to a yeast. These are all valid universes changing with the DNA-encoded perception of =ach species. On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Deepak Chopra > wro=e: I cannot in all honesty I believe that the universe we experience is totally a huma= construct Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road </=pan> Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: 4=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/> 2 EFTA_R1_01544245 EFTA02447284 chttp://w=w.radicalbeauty.com/> On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:38 PM, > wrote: From: "Sperry Andrews" =1 c=pan class="" style="font-size:12pt"» "Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne"=/span> What makes mutual understanding "perfect" ? I find, the challeng= here on this list, and in life, appears precarious at times. Well, yes. Humans are not always stable, get easily frightened. When we are, c=nsciously aware of our non-verbal sensory/emotional experience - which=reliably allows our verbal-analytic minds to integrate their abstract conc=pts with what is intimately being sensed and felt - we seem to agr=e. Yes, but (1) you describe an i=eal ego-free state. (2) It seem to be this is not yet 1 goal for the=whole group so we don't benefit from task unification as we did before the list mergings. Their makes it harder but a=so better. Otherwise, we go round and around in circles - as if=caught up in a dictionary of terms with different meanings for each of us - oft=n times becoming strident about what we wish to share more intelligently v=a mutual understanding. (3) That's the different, opposing agendas. I for one would love to see =s aspire to paradigm change. In the absence of sharing non-verbally - in a fully embodied wa= - as one single Self/Self aware consciousness, we learn from sufferin= - to un-learn these habits. I can see practice achievin= that with basic criteria met first. Sperry, you are an able mediato=. Love Suzanne On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:28 AM, > wrote: Deepak, Sperr=, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne Original Message From: Sperry Andrews < I.> 3 EFTA_R1_01544246 EFTA02447285 To: Deepak Chopra < Cc: < Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 pm Subject: Re: thought With every new instant of perceptual activity, I feel our m=rtal forms more closely approximating what is constant. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Deepak Chopra > wrote: I find it existentially exhilarating =br class=""> Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book:</=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/> Book-Cover-1.png> <http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty- On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM, Hugs, Sperry,=/font> > wrote: 4 EFTA_R1_01544247 EFTA02447286 With your 1st 5 lines. I have problems with the res= of what you say here. I find it existentially despairing. Love, Suzanne riginal Message From: Sperry Andrews To: ; Carlo Monsanto ELIZABE=H A. RAUSCHER M>; Haramein Jim Belchler ; Karla Galdamez ;; Rudy Tanzi ; Subhash Kak enas 'a atos ; Millard Wohl Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 2:36 pm Subject: Re: thought contemplating math symbolically, when we divide 1 by an infinitely large number we most closely approximate O. 1/infinity = O, This " I " experiences being a singular unity tha= is continuously being divided by infinite variations on a theme, re-creating what " I " AM BEing as an awakeness t=at is receiving and reflecting some sense of all that ever was, is and will be, as no body=going nowhere, unborn, deathless, immeasurable, indivisible, timeless cons=iousness. 5 EFTA_R1_01544248 EFTA02447287 On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Sperry Andrews =span dir="ltr" class=""> > wrote= That which is 'not a thing' cannot be divided--contributing=an essential, indispensable, 'eternal' constant to all forms. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM, > wrote: Hugs, Sperry, Hooray! You acknowledge there is form. Your last sentence, however, for me, does not deal with f=rm enough. The point unfolded to make the ultimate case for in=ivisibility but even points are divisible. Immortal is a theological concept whic= I believe applies (like eternal) only in the sense that atoms recycle. Love, Suzanne Original Message From: Sperry Andrews To: Deepak Chopra < C Sent: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 2:06 pm Subject: Re: thought 6 EFTA_R1_01544249 EFTA02447288 to any of 'you' ? trans=ent life possible. experienced by humanity as whole. This - below - appears to be so to this " I. " =nbsp;Does any of 'this' make sense Without both hydrogen and oxygen there would be no water--which makes The zen chant we all know, form is formlessness, formlessness is form, can =e Without formlessness form would not transform in space over=time. Without form formlessness would be nothing at all. These two ingredients constantly mixing together, perpetuat= their characteristics. Formlessness uniting all as one, while forms attempt to perfect their capacity to be like fo=mlessness-- indivisible, immortal, all knowing consciousness. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM,=Deepak Chopra » wrote: "I " is not a person The is no such thing as a person . You are never the same person as a child infant teen ager older man/ woman&=bsp; "I " is the awareness in which the so called person arises and su=sides as an intermittent stream of sensations images feelings and thoughts=. These in turn arise in " I " are known in " I "= and are made out of " I " ." I " is infinite being ( =ormless ' ) having a finite experience as form . The form is an illusion as it is phen=mena - an activity of the formless . All forms are phenomena . All phenome=a arise and subside in every moment of now .The formless is the only reali=y . It is timeless being . You cannot hold on to a time bound phenomenon . It is not a "thing =quot; . Even the " you " that you call " I " is a time=bound phenomenon . Nothing to hold on to and no one doing the holding on = Freedom in Being =3D Yoga Book-Cover-l.png> Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: </=pan>Radicalbeauty.com <http://radicalbeauty.com/> <http://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty- 7 EFTA_R1_01544250 EFTA02447289 On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:33 AM, > wrote: Hugs= Deepak: A thought about <=ont color="#000080" class="">l Am The Universe: There are millions o= people, IN THE MAINSTREAM, who buy, for example, Greg Braden's books abou= cyclical universes. If they feel, accurately, that the universe is =n an irreversibly downward spiral, I don't think they'll be calmed or comforted by a concept claiming what your title claim=. Can you find some wa= to say what you must while adding to it? Much=love, Suza=ne Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi Joseph. P. and=Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology Harvard Medica= School Vice•Chair, Ne=rology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit Massachusetts =eneral Hospital 114 16th Stree= Charlestown, M=, 02129 c/=iv> http://www.mghmind.org/facult=/Tanzi http://dms.h=s.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php 8 EFTA_R1_01544251 EFTA02447290

Technical Artifacts (18)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainw.radicalbeauty.com
Phone2447283
Phone2447284
Phone2447285
Phone2447286
Phone2447287
Phone2447288
Phone2447289
Phone2447290
URLhttp://=adicalbeauty.com
URLhttp://chopra.com
URLhttp://dms.h=s.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php
URLhttp://jiyo.com
URLhttp://kimberlysnyder.com/wp-content=uploads/2016/09/Radical-Beauty
URLhttp://radicalbeauty.com
URLhttp://www.choprafoundation.org
URLhttp://www.mghmind.org/facult=/Tanzi
Wire Refreflecting

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.