Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02452996DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02452996

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02452996
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:54 PM To: David Sauvage Subject: Re: if you said she had brown eyes, it wouldnt appy to j=st anyone. you said she was girlie, the dress was a girl=e dress. you said she was rigid, astro=ger language.. there were many photos of people in the room, = chose not to ask you to pick names given in random order. Q=A0 have your subjects write their own desci[tions of themselvesQ=A0 . shy - 1- 10. rigid 1-10. cu=ious 1-10. then choose who wrote which=one. try 20 people. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1=:48 AM, David Sauvage < wrote= <mail That's cool. <=r> Question for you: when I read your lady-friend in the room, d=d you feel I was tapping into something real? Or did you feel I was just s=ying random stuff that would apply to anyone, like the astrologer? David On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:44 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: i told them that the astroler in the room could tell them the=r diagnosis. they all received the exact same piece of p=per , however they all rated the astrologer as between good an perfe=t On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, David Sauvage <=a href=' target="_blank">davidrsauvage@=mail.com> wrote: I'm confused. You did an experiment with 200 girls where you h=ld their hands and rating them? Or that's what you're suggesting f=r me? On Tu=, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:30 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]>=/span> wrote: you dont =ave to be a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. =C240 does massage work? not a science question , but so=e think it does. can you prove to anyone that your intui=ive abilities are repeatable. verifiable, . =robably not. but is ok. with vast experience, chi=ese doctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly, t>=A0 the eyes are a little dull and yellow, its not science but = pretty good predictor. . the other experiment you can t=y if you want is hold their hands. write down what you feel.=C240 , and afterwards have them choose which best descr=bes their charcateristics. I did this with 200 gir=s. each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a scale =f 1-10. the results ranged from 3-10. =C21> however, the written diagnosis was exa=tly the same for each, no one like the results . belive=ng is more fun EFTA_R1_01553667 EFTA02452996 On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage < » wrote: I don't mind anything you're saying - I =m definitely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't know mu=h about experiments and design. I feel like=it'd be good to talk it out? I say what I can do, and somebody who kno=s science tells me how we can test that, until we arrive at a solution tha= works both ways? Sent from my mobile device On=Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gm=il.com» wrote: I like you, I am tr=ing to be kind, that is not science. . if you make peopl= feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you. 4,=A0 how about being blindfolded and guessing their name. =he outcome must be verifiable, not you are shy , sometim=s. angry other times . the trick of mentalists that do m=ch better than that. they could take a strength tinder test,=C24, and then you could take it with empathy for them, there =re 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 percent right= On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage » wrote: Jeffrey, Just an additional thought.=A vision, actually-- What if I did readings blindfolded? So = held someone's hand and felt into them. With such limited visual/tact=le information, it would be a real test of my empathic abilities. It would=almost validate "the sixth sense." Then=maybe we could compare my ability to read people with an average person Hs ability to read people? Just brainstormi=g here... Very best, David <=iv class="gmail_extra"> On Mon, Aug 15, 20=6 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage < »=wrote: I would lo=e to do that. Definitely has higher probability of success. 2 EFTA_R1_01553668 EFTA02452997 Sent from my mobile device On Aug 15, 2=16, at 8:52 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I greatly appreciatei the honesty,=C2* I dont think will work with pictures. but might wo=k face to face. if it will work at all. if so I would t=y 10 women, and ten names. . you willl need to touch eac= one. . On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage < » wrote: Hi Jeffrey and Gino, Earlier toda=, I sat down with 15 pictures and 15 names and tried to match them. It tur=ed out to be quite a struggle -- primarily because people were very simila=. For instance, I'd have descriptions like this: <=iv>Shy but relatively happy on the outside Filled with frustrati=n and anxiety Burning with rage deep down But out of the 15 people, that could vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my=matching ending up looking like a convoluted chart. </=iv> What I concluded was that I need a bit more help designing this ex=eriment. Ideally, rather than matching 15 names to pictures, I have a bunc= of binary decisions (A or B). One would expect me to get 50% right. IF th= people are emotionally different enough (happy v. sad, for instance) I hy=othesize I will do considerably better than chance. Does that make sense?<=div> I have started to go down this road with my friend=at NYU. Happy to discuss with Gino as well. Open to any and all =houghts. Science, clearly, is not my gift. Very b=st, David On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage Great meeting you. David <=div> 3 EFTA_R1_01553669 EFTA02452998 <=div> Sent from my mobile device On Aug 7, =016, at 6:22 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: david, if you can do th= name to photo test. in a 25 picture test. i= could be an interesting begining, I suggst you take t=enty women all availbel on google or facebook and try. =C24/0 , =C24o please note The information contained in this communication =s confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute in=ide information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It =s the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thi= communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be=unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please noti=y us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and des=roy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachment=. copyright -all rights reserved Q=A0 please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, 4 EFTA_R1_01553670 EFTA02452999 including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 40=N) please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 4,=A0 please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged =may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly proribited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 5 EFTA_R1_01553671 EFTA02453000 4>=AO please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney- client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 4>=AO please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 6 EFTA_R1_01553672 EFTA02453001

Technical Artifacts (9)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2452996
Phone2452997
Phone2452998
Phone2452999
Phone2453000
Phone2453001

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.