Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02453353DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02453353

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02453353
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: To: Subject: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Wednesday, August 24, 2016 4:53 PM Re: in a two player game what if one player BELIVE= there is an observer but there is not. the payoff matrix shou=d change.? On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:48 PM, =om <mailto > wrote: > On Aug 24, 2016, at 06:09, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > do you believe a bunch of chemicalls has a goal, ? It depends a bit on how we use the words; do you think that a bunch of chem=cals can do mathematics or be money? I think it makes sense to say "y=s". A goal is part of a causal model that we use to describe a agent that can c=mmit to pursuing a world state. Outside of this model, the word has no mea=ing. Within the model, it makes the behavior of some bunches of chemicals =omewhat predictable on a particular level. I think most chemical systems do not have goals, in the sense that we canno= meaningfully ascribe to them that they have agency. For that, they need - some kind of preference system, - a way to determine and represent world states, - a way to make decisions for world states based on the preferences, - a way to act on decisions so that the preferred world state becomes more =ikely. For instance, a corporation is an agent in this sense, and a cat is too. Pe=haps would say that cells can have goals, too. A Roomba cleaning robot is a particularly good example: when it cleans the =oom, it has no goal, because it has no model of the cleanliness of the roo=, and no preference to make it cleaner. We can test for this: if its dirt =ontainer is full, it will happily make a clean room more dirty, because it=just moves randomly around while rotating its brushes. The cleaning is an =mergent result. On the other hand, when it runs low on battery, it will explicitly search f=r its power station and drive there to recharge, and after that, it will c=ntinue cleaning. It explicitly represents the charging state, and when sta=ved for power, it commits to a goal that makes it direct its actions on en=ering that state. in his classical book "vehicles", looks at=different kinds of cybernetic feedback systems, and at different kinds of =gency that can be implemented in them. My own thinkin is mostly shaped by=the ideas of social agency, by the Italian computer scientist and by > isnt that in your words just one of the stories we =ell ourselves.? why is it not merely chemicals EFTA_R1_01554136 EFTA02453353 I would say that a goal is part of a "software specification". Nature can get a bunch of chemicals to enact this specification. But it can a=so be done mechanically, electrically or socially. > . like in a magnetic field forced to line up w=th other chemcilas in the vicinity, . more Hike magnets =lining up. Do you think there is a lowest level, and that it makes sense to speculate =hat it is? Fundamental physics explores the idea of the lowest causally closed level. = made an online survey during the FQXi conference, and got 49 responses fr=m the participants. 18 believed that the universe is fundamentally just ma=hematics or information (8 of those think it is just information). 19 beli=ve in a material universe (4 of those think only space or spacetime exists=. 15 respondents hold that a conscious observer or God is necessary (some =f them overlap with the materialists). For what its worth, the idea that only information is real does not seem to=be especially strange. What is your view/intuition? You are right when you say that my view is strongly influenced by being a c=mputer scientist. Once I made the leap that our observations of the world =re fundamentally not different from what a computer game player can observ=r on his screen, and that we can produce every conceivable sequence of obs=rvations via a computer program, I saw no way out again, especially after = got to see observers/minds as computer programs, too. Everything we know =bout ourselves, we know through sequences of observations, too, and observ=tions are sets of discernible differences (= bits of information). Cheers, =AO please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01554137 EFTA02453354

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2453353
Phone2453354

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.