Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02463819DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02463819

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02463819
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:34 PM To: Joichi Ito Subject: Re: Antidisciplinary Science Fellows Proposal 011 331 441 70210 On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:28 PM, loichi Ito <mailto > wrote: The MIT Media Lab seeks support for a fellowship pro=ram in Antidisciplinary Science. The Lab is a leader in this area, which p=omises to fundamentally rethink research and practice around scientific in=uiry. We seek $12 million to fund and operate the first three years of thi= fellowship program. Today, we fa=e a crisis in science. Academic science is not leading to breakthrough inn=vations, and the disciplinary structures of the academy are largely to bla=e. Certain types of research are recognized and rewarded, and become defin=d as disciplines. As this happens, people begin talking only to a very sma=l peer group, often by publishing in a small number of very specific journ=ls. Meanwhile, we believe the most important scientific questions today re=ide in the spaces between disciplines. work. An antidisciplinary project isn =99t a sum of many disciplines but something entirely new—the word =efies easy definition. But what it means to the Media Lab is someone or so=ething that doesn't fit within a traditional academic discipline =94a field of study with its own particular words, frameworks, and methods.=Most academics are judged by how many times they have published in prestig=ous, peer-reviewed journals. This system often leads researchers to align =heir work to the dictates of peer review rather than risking the potential=repercussions of an unconventional approach. Indeed, the current peer revi=w system causes hyper-specialization where people in different fields have=a very difficult time collaborating—or even communicating—=ith people in other fields. When =oi thinks about the "space" the Lab has created, he likes =o imagine a huge piece of paper that represents "all science. =80 The disciplines, such as "chemistry," "genet=cs" or "design" are small black dots on this paper= The massive amounts of white space between the dots represent antidiscipl=nary space. Many people would like to play in this white space, but there =s very little funding available, and it's even harder to get a ten=red position without some sort of disciplinary anchor in one of the black =ots. Additionally, it appears inc=easingly difficult to tackle many of the interesting problems—as w=ll as the "wicked problems"—through a traditional =isciplinary approach. Unraveling the complexities of the human body is the=perfect example. Our best chance for rapid breakthroughs should come throu=h a collaborative "One Science." But instead, we seem unab=e to move beyond "many sciences"—a complex mosaic =f so many different disciplines that often we don't recognize when=we are looking at the same problem because our language is so different an= our microscopes are set so differently. EFTA_R1_01570958 EFTA02463819 So how do we find talent in as yet un-named fields? We h=pothesize that the regular academic processes of hiring and peer review wi=l not find these people. And current programs to find exceptional individu=ls are either too organized or not organized enough. There is a limit to h=w much the search for geniuses can and should be centrally planned and org=nized, as the best people tend to have their discussions outside of instit=tions. Events like O'Reilly's FOO Camp are a wonderful exa=ple of successful models of unstructured ways of discovering and engaging =uch talent. However, we are interested in exploring a different way that b=tter integrates with the academic research structure. Therefore the Media =ab is developing a new prize and fellowship program focused on finding ext=aordinary minds who are working beyond disciplinary bounds. The Antidisciplinary Science=Fellowship Program proposes to locate remarkable people working in antidis=iplinary white spaces by offering prizes to individuals from inside and ou=side academia, giving them access to the resources of the Media Lab and ea=h other, and bringing them to the attention of the world. We will work wit= a group of nominators and we will also utilize a novel Web-based nominati=n crowdsourcing platform, also offering prizes to people who identify such=exceptional talents. A small, distinguished selection committee will then =eview nominees and award prizes of $100,000 each to a maximum of ten indiv=duals each year. Each winner will select up to five other individuals work=ng on a related topic, forming an investigational cluster. Team members in=each cluster will receive a prize of $10,000. All Fellows and team members=will stay in their current locations, but will be brought together at an a=nual Fellows event at the Media Lab, and will also communicate regularly o=er the course of a year. Through this project the MIT Media Lab aims to trigger a shift =n the nature of scientific inquiry and nurture entire new areas of discove=y that could bring about beneficial impacts to humanity. We believe the La= can bring the right balance of institutional rigor and free-form creativi=y to this search and selection process. The Media Lab is a top research an= teaching program within one of the world's best universities, but=at the same time is also unique within MIT. And we have worked for 30 year= to ensure that our students and faculty have the freedom to explore the w=ldest and most compelling of ideas. Budget (over 3 years) Staff: =AO =C2 =AO =C2 $1,118,164 =span style="font-size:14.666666666666666px;font-family:Calibri;vertical-=lign:baseline;white-space:pre- wrap">Travel: =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 $=90,000 Materials and Service=: =C2 $210,000 Convenings: =C2 =A0 =C2 =A0 $1,200,000 Overhead at 20%: =AO =C2 <=span> $1,998,633 Total: =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =11,991,797 2 EFTA_R1_01570959 EFTA02463820 =C2 please note The information co=tained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client pr=vileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for JEE Unauthorized use= disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is str=ctly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this commu=ication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e=mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereo=, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> 3 EFTA_R1_01570960 EFTA02463821

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2463819
Phone2463820
Phone2463821

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.