Case File
efta-02467009DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02467009
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02467009
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Thursday, April 7, 2016 3:59 PM
To:
Larry Visoski
Subject:
Re: G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04-06-16
Sorry, my instructions were clear . No further contact . We are done . I =A0have great respect for Joe , I think your sellers
have over played a ver= week hand . Maybe will meet on another plane in the future . Thank=
On Thursday, 7 April 2016, Larry Visoski <
From Frank
Sent from my iP=one
Begin forwarded message:
<mailto
> wrote:
From: Frank Janik <fjanik@leas.=om <javascript:_e(%7B%7D=Jcvmr,[email protected]);»
Date: April 7, 2016 at 11:45:34 AM EDT
To: =arry <
<javascript: e(%7B%7D,scvml
O139;);> >
Cc: "Joseph=L. Carfagna Jr.'
S=bject: RE: G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04-06.16
=br>
Thanks Larry — we'll share with the seller =nd see if we can get some movement. Is the bigger issue the
lack of =hem wanting to put funds in escrow so that in the event of Seller'= default the buyer can have direct access to
cash and more easily get reimb=rsed?
Warmest regards,
Frank Janik
Vice President - Transactions
www.leas=com <http://www.leas.com/>
EFTA_R1_01575747
EFTA02467009
=/u>
From: Larry [mailto
;>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 10:54 AM
To: Frank Janik <
Cc: Joseph L. Carfagna Jr.
> &=t;
Subject: Re: G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04-06-16=u>
Frank and Joe,
The changes are unacceptable. Knowing the unus=al state of affairs, along with your refusals to deal
with clear and =robable risks, I have been instructed to discontinue any further disc=ssions.
Thank you for trying,
I wish you luck,
Larry
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 7, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Frank Janik <
>
wrote:
Hello Larry — Thank you for your comments to the Plan D Offer fo= G550 #5070. Please see our
client's response to your change= in the attached REDLINE EDIT of Purchaser's Offer plus their comm=nts to your 5 main
questions/requests below. Assuming you want to make additional changes to Seller's attached =dits, please continue to
"Track Changes" so we can more ea=ily tell what you changed. Thanks.
1.
We are OK with your n=ed for 10 days for the visual inspection.
2.
ALL costs required to=register the aircraft in the US after a closing with Plan D will to be
the=responsibility of the Purchaser. The Seller will cooperate with your=research and requirements for the issuance of
2
EFTA_R1_01575748
EFTA02467010
an Export C of A that enables the aircraft to be issued a US Certificate of Airworth=ness, BUT all costs and modifications
of the Aircraft, it's engine=, APU, documents, etc. required for an Export C of A so that the Aircraft =s in compliance with
US CofA requirements should be paid by Purchaser.
3.
We agree the Delivery=Conditions should state that Aircraft should be free of any history
of material damage and material corrosion. =AO We added the word "material" in front of damage in the =O1 and
suggest that we keep it simple for now in the La and let the attor=eys better define the words "material damage" and
=9Cmaterial corrosion" in the Purchase Agreement.
4.
The concept of the Se=ler putting money into escrow to cover those Purchaser funds
Seller uses o=t of escrow for inspection costs defeats the whole concept and appeal of y=ur deal. If Seller has to put
money in escrow to cover these costs they might as well pay Gulfstream directly for the costs= If the transaction fails
because of Seller's breach or beca=se correcting the discrepancies exceeds $2MM, the Seller will reimburse th=
Purchaser the full purchase price amount but it cannot be held in escrow.
S.
We understand that th=re needs to be a consequence for a Seller breach or Seller's faili=g
to deliver other than because the aircraft will cost more than $2MM to f=x; however, similar to 4. above the funds
cannot come out of escrow as it defeats the whole concept and appeal of your deal. W= also agree in the case of such a
breach of failure to deliver, Purchaser=E2 s out of pocket costs for the ARCS inspections and "other=E2 costs invested
in the project by Purchaser should be reimbursed by the Seller, but Seller will need a way to limit and quantify=what
costs it will be responsible for reimbursing. Rather than get t=o bogged down in the LOI trying to list exactly what costs
are included an= how they are reimbursed, we suggest we press forward, and if we have a deal, we can provide further
details in=the Purchase Agreement on what "other costs" paid by Purch=ser shall be reimbursed by Seller.
OTHER Explanations:
*
Paragraph 4: We can get a formal Gulfstream Quot= that will include the Flat Rate Cost for
the required inspections but it =ill be provided PRIOR to the Inspection and included as an Exhibit in the =urchase
Agreement; however, there is no way to include a full out-the-door cost for all of the inspect=ons until Gulfstream starts
the inspections as the total costs will be dep=ndent upon what Gulfstream finds during the Inspection.
*
We understand and agree to the concept of a "C=osing Deadline" but feel it would be
better to tackle that concept=in the Purchase Agreement as it is unclear at this point how we would defi=e when the 30
days would start (after RTS, after Inspection completion, after export CofA issued, etc.?) or if 3= days is the right
number.
Warmest regards,
Frank Janik
3
EFTA_R1_01575749
EFTA02467011
Vice President - Transactions
www.leas.com <http://www.leas.com>
Original Message
From: Larry Visoski imailto
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 9:58 PM
To: Frank Janik
C
);»
Subject: G550 serial 5070
Joe and Frank,
;»; Joseph L.
We have reviewed the LOI and need to make some revisions, which are refl=cted on the
attached document. The main ones are discussed below:=/u>
1.
We will need 10 days =or the visual inspection as my schedule is fairly tight right now.<=>
2.
As this is an Isle of=Man registered aircraft that would ultimately be registered in the US
afte= a closing with Plan D, the Aircraft must as a delivery condition be fully=compliant with all requirements for
issuance of a US Certificate of Airworthiness. An Export C of A should be required=at delivery and the costs of bringing
the Aircraft, its engines, apu and d=cuments in compliance with US C of A requirements should be borne by Selle=.
Those requirements should be included within the definition of Discrepancies.
3.
As part of the Delive=y Conditions, the Aircraft should be free of any history of damage
and mat=rial corrosion.
4.
In order to ensure th=t Buyer will be able to receive its full escrowed payment of the
entire Pu=chase Price if Seller does not deliver, the Seller will have to put an add=tional amount in Escrow to cover the
amount of the "Non-Refundable Deposit" that it will use to pay for inspe=tion costs and corrections. If the transaction
4
EFTA_R1_01575750
EFTA02467012
fails because of Sell=r's breach or because correcting the discrepancies exceeds $2MM, t=ere needs to be a way to
ensure that Purchaser's payment of the full purchase price in escrow can be recovered.
5.
There also needs to b= a consequence for a Seller breach or Seller's failing to deliver
=ther than because the aircraft will cost more than $2MM to fix. In c=se of such a breach of failure to deliver,
Purchaser's out of pock=t costs for the ACRS inspections and any consultants, pilots, or professiona=s it must hire in
order to get this transaction closed expeditiously shoul= be reimbursed by the Seller.
Please get back to me after you have reviewed this with Seller, Thank yo=.
Regards,
Larry
<G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Buyer) 04-04-16.d=cx>
<G550 #5070 - Plan D Offer (Seller Edit) 04.0=-16.docx>
=AO
please note
The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may constitute
inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized =se,
disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or b= e-mail to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
5
EFTA_R1_01575751
EFTA02467013
Technical Artifacts (10)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Phone
2467009Phone
2467010Phone
2467011Phone
2467012Phone
2467013URL
http://www.leas.comWire Ref
RefundableRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02078835
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02097596
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02225369
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01731630
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02327165
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Larry Visoski
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.