EFTA02482682

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 11:22 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: but the words are generated by chemical electrical a=tions. . nothing more. there is no make believe force. .=C2 go to the source. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Noam Chomsky < » wrote: She is great, great, great. But=for the moment, roles reversed. Valeria tore a muscle lifting someth=ng that she shouldn't have. Had to call of our trip. Last one was called off because I broke a rib. Maybe the next one be=ause our dog will have a nervous breakdown. It's certainly true that ther= are all kinds of information transfer. Human language, a particular=biological object, can also be used for this purpose (though it is hard to comprehend the common claim that this is its "functi=n"). Suppose, however, that we limit ourselves to organ-to•o=gan signaling. Would it be appropriate to ask why chemical signals a=e not "merely a signal for internal use", just like electr=cal, linguistic, other? I don't think so. We would want to =now what chemical signals are and how they work, and the same for electric=l, linguistic, etc. They are all radically different, and their part=cular nature is the object of inquiry into them. And again, linguistic systems are rad=cally different from the others in that signaling is only one of many uses=of language, statistically speaking (for what that's' worth, probably not much) a very minor one. =nd crucially, investigation of the nature of language has, I think, yielde= mounting and significant evidence that in the design of language external=zation altogether is a peripheral property, largely a reflex of whatever sensory modality is used, hence special uses such as =ommunication even more so. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:23 PM To: Noam Chomsky <[email protected] < Subject: > > cells signal each other by various means. =AO. chemical gas . electrical, . , multicellular=C2 other chemicals. wider range of signals. some sigals internal some external. =AO. why is not'• language merely a signal for internal u=e . organ to organ, sense to sense. the eyes telling nos= where to turn. etc. . and then it gets vocalized for external signa=ling as part of a repertoire. gesture prosody etc. is there a u=iversal vocalization , OW for example, when pain s=nsors EFTA_R1_01599491 EFTA02482682 engage? and vocalize as a by product of the info transfer. =AO . I love to see how your wife takes care of you. =AO great great great please no=e The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please =ote The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01599492 EFTA02482683