Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02500395DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02500395

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02500395
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Lesley Groff Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 5:10 PM To: Rich Kahn; jeffrey E. Cc: bellaklein Subject: Fwd: Joe Thakuria I =hink we sent along 10k as well...Bella can you =heck? Begin forwarded message: From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: =/b>Re: Joe =hakuria Date: =/b>February 24, 2014 at =:23:06 PM EST To: =/b>Lesley Grof give him 10k On Mon, Feb 24, =014 at 5:21 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin =orwarded message: Really? Ok, done (pending approval through =artners/MGH IRB for my formal research study • about 5 weeks as we =iscussed). =ichard Kahn From: Joseph Thakuria Date: =ebruary 24, 2014, 4:08:44 PM EST To: Lesley Groff Cc: Rich Kahn q Subject: =b>Re: Jeffrey Epstein wrote: EFTA_R1_01627323 EFTA02500395 Can we get a little =dditional software budget for secondary analyses? At least the $4K =orth we would have gotten with an exome? The rationale for this is so =e don't have to completely rely only "black box" interpretation by =llumina. In my experience, Illumna's genome interpretation has been =istorically subpar. Not surprising since they are primarily a next gen =NA sequencing instrumentation company • not really focused on analyses =nd genomic analyses software (though they do have their own). It may be =hat we don't pull up a lot of extra info with additional software. But =e won't know that one way or the other relying only on Ilumina's =nterpretation. Anyway, let me know. The budget/invoice is complete =f we all we are going after is one item: a rapid turnaround whole =enome through Illumina for $11,400. I do think this is the best =highest quality) whole genome you can get for the money but it is =isappointing to me that their pricing has been essentially unchanged =or years (the reason I expected this to be in the $5K range). I do =hink I can find a whole genome for around $5K (perhaps through CGI) but =gain I'd question the quality of that genome. (That was the research rationale for getting 1 from Illumina and 1 from CGI to compare results =f the funding were available for this). Let me know if this needs any further =larification. Thanks =gain, Joe On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Lesley Groff =span dir="Itr"> <rnailto > wrote: Hi Joe...below is Jeffrey's reply: lets start and do the full =enome with rapid turn around. 11, 400 On Feb 24, 2014, at =:38 PM, Joseph Thakuria > =rote: Hi Lesley and =ich, Lesley, can you forward the following info to =effrey? So when I sent the initial invoice I =idn't have the actual whole genome costs through Illumina which are =9500 for a normal turn around time and $11,400 for "rapid turn around rime". The rapid turn around time isn't necessary in Jeffrey's case. =nd, in my opinion, if the budget is only $5000, I think the most bang =or his buck (and this is what I would do for myself with only $5000 to =pend) is to get an exome done. I should be able to get this through =mbry and through the same research protocol we'll be suing for the YPO =tudy participants for $1000. I would then use the remainder to purchase =enome analyses tools (there won't be enough for any servers) to perform =econdary analyses on the exome. The exome only represents around 1.5% of the genome = but this is the medically most important part of the genome (at least =iven our current knowledge) and represents all the coding regions in =11 our 20,000+ genes. 2 EFTA_R1_01627324 EFTA02500396 If this sounds good to Jeffrey, I'll produce a final =udget before the end of the week that specifies which of the tools =e'll be able to get with the remaining $4000. (I need to finish pricing =nd tallying up features among the 6 I listed to determine which one(s) =ill get. This won't of course cover any cellular work or =ther items in the full invoice but I would still recommend moving at =east some fibroblast cell lines aliquots from the PGP to our new study =o we can work on those when funding from other sources is =vailable. I would also just throw out there for Jeffrey's =onsideration that the same ambitious protocol for a stripped down =linical next generation DNA sequencing laboratory could be pursued with = similar budget on the commercial side - and I've already been in =iscussion with others about funding this effort. Having followed this =pace since 2005 I can say the timing is very good for this type of =usiness right now. Again, it hasn't even been more than a year that =his technology has transitioned into clinical care. So if this is =omething Jeffrey would be interested in pursuing as an investor with an =quity stake, rather than as a philanthropic grant for academic =esearch, that would be another route for going ahead with the full =roject that he may be interested in discussing further. Rich, I'll leave it to you on how you'd like to =andle the $5000 invoice. I could receive this as a lump sum and account =or how it is spent. I would expect all of it to be used up before the =nd of the summer. We can also arrange it so that as the various vendors =sequencing and software) provide invoices, your office pays them =irectly. Either way is fine with me. I don't have a preference. Thanks and let me know if I can provide any =larifications. Again, I'll follow up with an invoice capped at $SK =efore the end of the week (assuming you agree with the =bove). Joe Thakuria On Fri, Feb 21, =014 at 6:34 PM, Lesley Groff wrote: Hello Joe. I have =effrey's accountant on this email as well, Rich Kahn . Jeffrey has told =ich he would like to do a $5000 genetic work up done for the time =eing. Could you coordinate with Rich regarding payment/next steps? Thank you, Lesley Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein Sent from my iPhone =br> The =nformation contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of =he addressee. It is the property of 3 EFTA_R1_01627325 EFTA02500397 Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof =s strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in =rror, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" =arget="_blank">[email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_01627326 EFTA02500398

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2500395
Phone2500396
Phone2500397
Phone2500398

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.