Case File
efta-02521030DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02521030
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02521030
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent:
Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:52 PM
To:
Steven Sinofsky
Subject:
Re:
removing means only talking to me and not to jay, =so that i can filter and highlight,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Steven=Sinofsky
of course this is all good. there's no blame to go around.
<=iv>
couple of thoughts:
mailt
> wrote:
•
=ot sure what me "removing myself" does but up to you
•
my view is that they offered a "random $5m" and I came back with =ake me whole for leaving and not
asking to rest and vest ("the andy lees=treatment" as lisa Brummel/HR calls it). Brad will say this is a cost=to me of
being removed because was toxic. So is andy. But $10 s=ems like a random number halfway between a logical number
and another rand=m number ($5).
*
I would prefer not to name Samsung as instead say "Aside from this =ist of companies, Steven and other
former Microsoft employees can join any=organization without litigation". I want to push on other people and =ot have
them name Samsung or any other company (box.net <http://box.net> for example) a no fly zone *because* of me.<=li>
•
I don't want to be reciprocal in unenforceable things like non-dispar=gement. I want all of that to be
one sided. the goal is to make this as=petty as possible.
*
I have been beyond reproach. It is my style.=A0 I just don't do stuff like that about competitors or just
people I =on't like.
Ovitz says hi. We had lunch.
=div>Sent from Surface RT
Check out http://blog.learningbyshipping.com <http://blog.learningbyshi=ping.com>
From: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 1:17 PM
To: Steven Sino=sky
Brad is really at 10.=A0 being gracious and above reproach in this negotiation will go a long=way to stopping
steve from trashing you. you are right about the pr =nd i am very sensitve to it. I will handle it moving foward with
jay,=A0 you can always blame jay, we will tell brad that you have removed y=urself. I will charge you a one million
dollar fee ( i will no= get insulted if you choose not to ). Right at the end, not fo= jay , I will attempt to specifillay get
samsung approved. letting s=eve feel good that he fucked you already , will minimize the moving forwar= , so i do not
want to give up the higher amount demadn until the very =ast minute
EFTA_R1_01658071
EFTA02521030
On Wed,=Apr 3, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Steven Sinofsky
mailt
wrote:
My gosh, I am s000 sorry that I was=not explicit in showing my appreciation. I am deeply appreciative
from the=moment of referral to you checking in on things to the side dialogs you L=;ve had. I'm terribly sorry I did not
express that in a way that ma=e it clear.
Thank you.
I'm more th=n happy to turn this over to you. Any fee you want is fine. That isn=#39;t an issue for me
at all. Or if you don't want to be involved that=is fine too. I would rather be friends more than anything.
I'd like you to be involved. I just want you to =nderstand a little more about the situation. It is more
nuanced than a =oney negotiation i think.
We've both done =ots of contracts and have both been more involved with lawyers tons more t=an we
would have liked. But in very different ways and with different b=siness situations. Together we bring almost too much
experience.:)
For me, the currency in this negotiation isn't mone=. Steve doesn't care about the money because he
knows I am not moti=ated by the money. The most important thing for Steve is foreclosing op=ions for me. That is why
he did the negative stuff about me. The sec=nd most important thing is just feeling like he won. That means he gets=to
brag about something. Me being a vc is a victory for him. Me being a=startup CEO is a victory. Samsung is a clean loss.
I have been part of a dozen lawsuits filed after Micros=ft people went to competitors. It is nasty, public,
and ultimately Micr=soft prevailed in all of them. Either the person backed down or ended up s= tarnished they were
ineffective. The suits are filed regardless of the=work--"inevitable leakage of trade secrets".
PR is part of foreclosing options. People do remembe= pr. Read about "Kai Fu Lee". He was branded
ineffective a=d then left google as ineffective. He was a traitor then and is now a t=aitor to China. Maybe he is all of
those in reality, but he was also a =eading Carnegie Melon computer scientist.
This goes back to the 80's and is always done. S=nior people leave and there is a lawsuit if they go to a
competitor. Alway=.
If I choose to be a manager of people, espe=ially a large group, then that group will know about me
almost exclusively=through what they read about me. I don't get a chance to charm them= And because of the lag time
from start to releasing a new product it m=ans i have to change an organization and manage it with a cloud of doubt o=
worse. Getting the most out of a team becomes impossible. That'= the failure cycle. It is real.
Managing a large team when they get all of their inform=tion about their manager from the web or
launching a product when the pres= thinks they know you is all impossibly hard with bad "personal pr&qu=t;.
The "sightings" are real. lust like the co=ference I signed up for this is what impacts negotiation. I do
believe =n sharing that with counsel which might be different between us. Both w=ys can work (or not).
But the truth is people went straight to Steve and Stev= went straight to brad. Just like how steve fired
off panic mail after i s=gned up to speak at the conference.
2
EFTA_R1_01658072
EFTA02521031
It was a &=uot;material" event. Samsung is, in Steve's words, "our n=w biggest competitor". Microsoft
depends on hardware and only two =ompanies that make hardware are executing--apple and Samsung. Lenovo st=als
windows and all the others from hp to dell to asus are betting on andr=id big.
I don't think I have been flip flopping or erratic.= I have been frustrated at jays lack of engagement after
the New York me=ting. I think this is just like your frustration with his worries. = have no worries not closing but
dragging it out isn't good for anyone=since everything that happens in public changes the negotiation. Even Wind=ws
Blue(next release) gives Steve more confidence he doesn't need to s=gns this.
His second concern is me stealing people. That's=why he wants a gag order.
The only tool they =ave is money or suing me. Suing me is hard but hardly impossible. Th= only variable
is that suing me means a deposition for Steve. But if th=y don't sue me then they have to sue everyone who leaves with
me. T=at they don't prefer.
I think:
• $15m to me is fair and reasonabl= since it was comp i earned modulo the proxy bullshit which drops
125,000 =r so shares. For negotiation more than happy to say "plus 5m cash&quo=;. I don't care about the timeline. Id
set up an automatic escro= account so I don't have to go back to them.
• Not working at apple, google until 2014 is fine
=95 Cooperating and not poaching is fine
• The timeline doesn't matter so long as ja= is driving and not letting brad stall. That's new since jay is
draggi=g now.
I can say yes to Samsung with an agreement. If we don't have an=agreement I will get sued going to
Samsung. They know it and i know it.= If not then tell me why not?
I think they shou=d agree not to sue other microsoft people who leave to the same company as=me.
That's new. That's added because of the way they structu=ed the gag order. If I can't talk to them about stuff then i
can t=;t be recruiting them. If i go to Samsung they can't now declare th=t a competitor because of me. People can quit
and join other companies.=
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:34 AM, "Jeffrey Epstein"=<[email protected]
<mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com» wrote:
no secret I texted melz. I woudl like you to=succeed , which means only to get what you want, that is
for you to =ecide. I think it is a sensitce negotiation, therefore even more imp=rtant to decide on your persaonl
prioirites. get it closed, is ok, but =f that message comes out in the wrong way , it wil do you more harm than g=od .
One moment you say it has to get closed and the next you say=im not impatient. If I can help I will , It appears as if you
think i a= beating up on you , no thanks . thank you , or the merest sign of appr=ciation, I will play any role you choose,
except for the villain. =1 will take total control and leave you out if thats what you prefer. y=u are too close, and
worried about press, lawsuits, gossip, percieved sli=hts. I actully know how difficult this is for you, and if i were a g=rl
woudl give you a hug,. This is not life and death, things will be=ok,
=br>The information contained
in this communication is
confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and i= intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
3
EFTA_R1_01658073
EFTA02521032
Unau=horized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part th=reof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received t=is
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or=by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and
dest=oy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contain=d in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privile=ed, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contain=d in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privile=ed, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], =nd
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved
4
EFTA_R1_01658074
EFTA02521033
Technical Artifacts (9)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Phone
2521030Phone
2521031Phone
2521032Phone
2521033URL
http://blog.learningbyshi=ping.comURL
http://blog.learningbyshipping.comURL
http://box.netRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01951206
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01957994
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01908908
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01943353
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01910637
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01912337
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.