Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02524221DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02524221

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02524221
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Monday, January 11, 2010 7:42 PM Re: thank you, we should discuss this all.. you need to decide if you want the =ruth. On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:28 PM, =span dir="ltr"> <mailto > wrote: I agree this w=uld be more constructive. That's a good question and I should have ask=d it first. TALKING about what works and what doesn't would also be more constructi=e than sending an email asking me to leave. What I don't understand ab=ut that is how you expect another week alone to help the situation after s=eing the result of long breaks was just the opposite every time in the pas=. I understand you like your free time and so do I but attempting to actually=solve things in this relationship by sending me away for extended periods =f time is clearly counter-productive. I don't know how to have a relat=onship when I am constantly being told to leave the whole state for more t=an just a few days whenever you get the urge. It doesn't work for me. = am still getting over wasting the past 6 weeks and a month shortly before=that. I have only been here 10 days and you ask me to leave for another we=k. This is why I suggested to find a separate place. So you could spend th= 'time alone' and I don't have to keep putting my life on hold=and sit in nyc with nothing constructive to do whenever you feel like bein= alone. The cost is not much higher than my flying back and forth and it c=n be short term so I don't understand the hesitation even considering =he future travel reasoning... That's my suggestion but if you have a different one I'd like to he=r it. I am happy to discuss this evening what you feel I can do better and=what worked for you. Sent via portable phone From= Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:05:06 -0500 To: <1= <mailto > > Subject: i think=it would be more contructive for you and i to see what went right and ask =hat could be done better by both of us , instead of " why did you =end me that email " The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this EFTA_R1_01663257 EFTA02524221 communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachm=nts. ***** ********* *****•**, The information contained in this c=mmunication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy thi= communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 2 EFTA_R1_01663258 EFTA02524222

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2524221
Phone2524222

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.