Case File
efta-02528286DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02528286
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02528286
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent:
Thursday, April 1, 2010 12:45 PM
To:
Jes Staley
Subject:
highly confidential
In a candid but slightly guarded reply Larry Summers (LS)=responded that:
•
the financial re=orm legislation is 85- 90% certain to be passed through Congress this year=(others would be
more confident but IS said he would always allow for unfo=eseen events).
•
the most likely case=is that language in the legislation will be nearest to the language usedq=ont> by Senate
Banking Committee Chairman Christoph=r Dodd in the March 15 draft. LS said this would be along the lines of reg=lators
having 6 months to study the appropriateness of restrictions on pro=riety trading, at which point these restrictions
would come into force.
On being asked by LM whether this would me=n "may" or "shall" for f=deral agencies 'issuing final regulations
implementing' the Volcke= rule, LS responded that it's 40% along the "may to shall spectru="- most likely 'should'.
Banks would be restricted to activities they could =emonstrate were for a client or customer, but in practice LS only sees
thi= as limiting their activities around the margins. Whilst in name banks wou=d be stopped from engaging in propriety
trading, in practice LS saw banks-=and was comfortable with- rebranding such activities as services to custom=rs.
Therefore, although LS expects it to be less likely=to have banks buying up large hedge funds or getting involved in
negative =quity, he does not see the reforms being implemented in a way that substan=ially restrains their propriety
activities. LM and LS were both clear that=this would come down to how the legislation is enforced by the regulators
=nd LS assured LM they are very conscious of getting the right regulators i= place.
LS said that in practice, he would not envisage big=banks being broken up, or prevented from propriety trading. They
may split=off some activity into a holding company, but it could all still happen un=er the same brand and banner- it just
may need to re-jig some internal ins=itutional architecture so that propriety trading would be associated with = client,
internal or external.
***** **•.*••••=*****•*****••••***•••••***** ******** ********
The information contained =n this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged= may constitute
inside information, and is intended only for the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized
use, di=closure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected], and destroy thi= communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
EFTA_R1_01669804
EFTA02528286
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Phone
2528286Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
3p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02158315
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01817477
3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02436899
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01777537
3p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.