Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02576241DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02576241

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02576241
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Stephen Hanson < Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:15 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: example and only one of many U understand your comments - I was alw=ys just trying to get construction complete because of the pg. - ie enough m=ney The base info came from david as I sent to you - I have no idea i= these are totally accurate that is why you have adjustments - others have g=ven accurate info as what is needed to complete construction But I=will do my best to advise you on past due - future items needed - but david=won't share any accounting info - Sent from my iPad =n Oct 25, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gm=il.com» wrote: understood.. Im i= meetings this morning until 1. . - steve the pers=n who put this your numbers together should be fired they are n=t , an accountant . it is awful. . it contributes t= the issue. . I told you day one , that I thought this was a ba= deal. david asked you to do the restaurant. . = you said you didnt want to be his bitch and have him make money off of you= back. . you and i discussed it at length. I thought it a=bad idea , but you wanted to be in your words 50/50 =with david. I told you that that is a marriage and i thought un=ise. . you agiain put your foot on the gas, and wanted in=as a full participant. you bought the trade. &=bsp; the first PG was already crazy, . i never ever ever e=er would have suggested a pg EVER. I under any circumstance.&nb=p; . the second was more of the same but already pregant. =nbsp; . the numbers are all over the place.&nb=p; read the sheet you sent . past present future.&n=sp; all on the same line. you have been consissnat in say=ng if we jjust had enough money to open . that has been since march.&=bsp; . On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Stephen Hanson <=a href="mailto target="_blank" > wrote: =div>You should realize david lies about everything First I needed 800 k we had made a earlier budge= months ago that showed - if we opened months ago -I could have made it wit= 750k - david kept using this budget - I let it go What david did not share with you is that because=of such a late opening - I have given him an additional budget -of a loss o= 175k to get us to march - tmi - but opening so late gives you zero momentu= into first 3 months of 2018 This has still not ben addressed Because david has told everyone months ago we would have=the needed funding - we where told to start to ramp up - which increased pa=roll - I put the brakes on. From additional employees since zero funds ha=e come in - we need another 20 +employees to train and be ready to serve gu=sts- a 3.4 week process Jeffrey- this is where david just lies EFTA_R1_01748236 EFTA02576241 So let's say fu=ding does not happen for another 10 weeks and I draw $20 k a week for neede= payroll - so in theory I drew down another 200k and now david thinks the r=staurant only needs 400k - he is a total idiot The restaurant budget is based upon completion of con=truction and the ability to seat both units- lobby and basement - yes the b=sement can drag for 2 weeks after the opening of the lobby restaurant =/div> I have not pulled=my liquor license nor will I till the restaurant account Is funded with 750= - I'm not going on the hook to be responsible for shortfalls in that resta=rant LLC as it's solely in my name - nor am I going to beg david for funds&=bsp; I have told h=m many times - I will not open with out proper funding please note The inf=rmation contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney=client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended onry for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthor=zed use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof=is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this return e-mail or=by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved =/div> please note The inf=rmation contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney=client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended on=y for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthor=zed use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof=is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this return e-mail or=by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved =/div> 2 EFTA_R1_01748237 EFTA02576242

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2576241
Phone2576242

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.