Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02620127DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02620127

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02620127
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: J <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 12:12 AM To: Lawrence Krauss You of course have the right to commit financial suicide.. I'm a world class bomb disposal person. And you take all my time ask which wire to cut, and then do as you please , . No Lawrence don't cut the blue one. Cut the red, no Jeffrey my wife and friends tell me its ok . Since last November.and even last month when you said you thought that the president might apologize. ? L.). You have asked for advice , in large part ignored it. Arguing each time, you knew what you were doing. ? I was as strong as I could re the press statement , but again you chose to follow your own advice. Losing 1 million in funding. On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:03 PM Lawrence Krauss < > wrot=: I feel strongly about this.. and in this case I am right. Believe me, the rest of the document owes so much to you... give me this one because I am right here. Thanks so much On Oct 21, 2018, at 5:43 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote: no one will follow STOP FUCKING AROUND On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:40 AM Lawrence Krauss < > wrot=: namely.. I was told I could appeal the dean's recommendation but no= provost determination.. it was also clear in the instructions they gave me.. Namely exactly what it was I was appealling in my appeal doc.. that is why I focused on the dean's letter and not OEI report or provost determination. On Oct 21, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: I was told by the provost that his determination and also the determination of 00 was final. I could not appeal either directly to them... It was a very explicit statement. Their determination ended that part of the process and began the next part. On Oct 21, 2018, at 1:00 PM, J <[email protected]> wrote: you had ? no option to directly appeal? why did you put that in? On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:44 AM Lawrence Krauss <- > wrote= please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to EFTA_R1_01825705 EFTA02620127 [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyUst-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-idgkey> <integer>324186</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1540253525</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>remote-id</key> <string>865006</string> </dict> </plist> 2 EFTA_R1_01825706 EFTA02620128

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2620127
Phone2620128
URLhttp://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyUst-1.0.dtd

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.