Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02638285DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02638285

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02638285
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 5:19 PM To: DAVID SCHOEN Subject: Re: i did in fact 17, one day sh=rt of her 18th birthday, thel4 year old is j=st the attornys ginning up the story On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:17 PM D=VID SCFIOEN But I thought you pl=d to a 16 year old. On Mar 18, 2019, at 12:28 PM= she is the only really young girl 4>=A0 14. the only one > wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:16 PM wrote: Ok. I read excerpt and looks fanatastic and totally consistent wit= So what is the claim about her? Same as with- y=u paid for her lawyer and so she lied? If so, again a bit ironic sin=e part of agreement also required you to pay attorneys. received this Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com <http://mail.mob=le.aol.com> =C2* please note The information contained in this co=munication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may c=nstitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the ad=ressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or co=ying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. If you have communication in error,=please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]</=>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, EFTA_R1_01869658 EFTA02638285 including =11 attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 4o=A0 please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved conversation-id 339748 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1552929546 flags 8590195713 remote-id 914464 2 EFTA_R1_01869659 EFTA02638286

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainmail.mobile.aol.com
Phone2638285
Phone2638286
Phone2929546
URLhttp://mail.mob=le.aol.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.