Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02658557DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02658557

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02658557
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunda , Februa 19, 2017 2:45 PM To: Subject: Re: Hello Do you have your favorite cross that I can read On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM < <mailto > wrote: Live in Atlanta, most of my work is in NY - but practice all over=(arguing a case this week in Chicago, for example; guy in LA asking to ret=in me in 30 kilo cocaine case). Original Message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» To: David Schoen < Sent: Sun, Feb 19, 2017 9:28 am Subject: Re: Hello where are you based. ? <mailto On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:06 PM, < /=).> wrote: <mailto > > That is and always has been, of necessity, the bre=d and butter of my practice. As you might imagine, in organized crim= cases (i represent 2 of the purported bosses of the 5 families and have r=presented alleged head of Russian mafia, Israeli mafia, and a Canadian the=govt claimed was the biggest mafioso in the world) the lawyet generally ma=es his case by undermining the government's not through a direct case =ith pristine witnesses. I start preparing for every case, whether o.c., wh=te collar, or civil litigation, from the first client interview, by planni=g my cross-examination. For me, at least, a cross-examination center=d approach is the only (and by far the best) way to prepare and proceed fo= many reasons requiring a longer discussion and perhaps not so interesting=to most people. I think most lawyers with any significant criminal=defense practice or perhaps any litigation practice fancy themselves to be=adroit cross-examiners. That has not been my experience and you can =ill in the names you already know among criminal defense lawyers in my vie=. Most often an exercise in ego, to the client's detriment, lack=of prep (itself often a function of ego), and not listening to the witness=(lawyer often stuck to a script = missed opportunities in cross). =/div> Running out now to speak now to a group of senior =itizens about a case i did at the Supreme Court and other Israel related i=sues. David Sent from AOL Mobile Mail EFTA_R1_01905218 EFTA02658557 Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com <http://mail.mob=le.aol.com> <=div> wrote: On Sunday, February 19, 2017 jeffre= E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» we will see. in fact i just aske= who is good at cross. ? are you? On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, < /=» wrote: <mailto I see now the media is using this acosta =omination and the Maxwell case in NY to once again get your name in the mi=. I sure hope the lawyer(s) in this Maxwell case is someone who cros=-examines for a living if this case goes to trial. The case presents=a real opportunity for a hard-hitting cross-examiner to undermine credibil=ty with respect to a witness/plaintiff who apparently has a lot of baggage=to work with. I hope the lawyer doesn't add his or her name to t=e list of people who throw you under the bus in the process. Sorry t= see your name dredged up again. Take care, David Original Message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]» To: dschoen593 «mailto:[email protected]> cmailtc ><=r class="gmail_msg"> Sent: Wed, Jan 18, 2017 2:38 pm Subject: Re: Hello Same On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:11 PM < <mailto wrote: > > Just checking in to say happy new year and see how=things are going. I stopped in and saw our mutual friend in NY last =eek and it reminded me of you. I hope things are going well for you =nd that you have a great new year free from a lot of the hassles from the =edia and former "friends" and free from litigation. Take c=re. David Sent from AOL Mobile Mail =br class="gmail_msg"> Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com<=div> 2 EFTA_R1_01905219 EFTA02658558 please =ote The information contained in this communication is=br class="gmail_msg"> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@g=ail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please =ote The information contained in this communication is=br class="gmail_msg"> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@g=ail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved =C2 please note The information contained in this co=munication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may c=nstitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the ad=ressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or co=ying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibitedand may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error,=please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]/=>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including =11 attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_01905220 EFTA02658559 EFTA_R1_01905221 EFTA02658560

Technical Artifacts (10)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainmail.mobile.aol.com
Phone2658557
Phone2658558
Phone2658559
Phone2658560
URLhttp://mail.mob=le.aol.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.