EFTA02661216

From: Noam Chomsk) Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2018 7:21 PM To: jeffrey E.; Valeria Chomsky Subject: Fwd: Marital Trust Makes sen=e, but I'd like to approach it in steps. I'm interested to h=ar what Harry will suggest, so I think I'll write him along the lines = mentioned to you. And if nothing sensible works, will do as you sug=est. [email protected]> wrote: there is nothing except the split a=d mutual releases from you valeria on one side and the childre= on the other. I suggest you take 2 million and they take 500k=plus the note On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 3:37 AM N=am Chomsk > wrote: Just got this from Harry. I'm inclined to wri=e a brief response saying that he ca= consult with lawyers if he likes, but I don't have to. There is no pr=blem at all with the proposal. I might also add=something about my response to his letter of March 29 and why I simply dis=issed it. OK? From: Harry Chomsk Forwarded messa e =r>Date: Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:44 PM Subject: Re: Marital Trust To Cc: Avi Chomsky >, Diana This is an inter=sting idea. We could consider it further, but I would need the advic= of my lawyer — and I assume you would want your own lawyer's =dvice as well — to ensure that any agreement we reach is consisten= with Massachusetts law and satisfies the interests, needs, and obligation= of everybody involved. Perhaps, as a next step, you could ask your =awyer to contact mine and begin a discussion in which we all participate.<=div> I'm also curious to hear your thoughts about t=e proposals I suggested in my message on March 29th. On Thu, M=y 17, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Noam Chomsk EFTA_R1_01909361 EFTA02661216 As l=wrote a little while ago, I did write a long response to your last -- deep=y depressing -- letter, but decided not to send it. I may return to =hat letter later but will keep to some factual matters that ought to be cl=ared up. But now I'm writing just about one point, =hich seems to be the core of the problem -- a problem, which, again, I don=#39;t understand. But let's put that aside, though I hope we can=clear it up soon. All of this is a painful cloud that I never =ould have imagined would darken my late years. Th= core issue seems to be the marital trust. I've explained how M =nd I actually set it up with Eric, which seemed to us just plain common se=se. I've also explained Max's different interpretation.Q=A0 I've asked you for yours, but haven't heard it. But let&#=9;s put that aside too, and just resolve the matter, as can be done very s=mply -- with no need for lawyers to explain the fiduciary responsibility o= the trustee I appointed years ago to replace me, something I never paid a=y attention to before. The simple solution is to =ivide the trust into two parts. One part will go to you, to use as y=u wish. One part will go to me, for me to use without any investigat=ons of my financial situation and other such intrusions that I won't a=cept. Then the trust can simply be dissolved, and it is all over. So I suggest that we proceed this way, and end the w=ole matter -- at least, whatever it is that I understand about what is of =oncern to you. Q=A0 please note The information contained in this commu=ication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01909362 EFTA02661217