Case File
efta-02667936DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02667936
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02667936
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Sent:
Saturday, December 3, 2016 4:06 PM
To:
Danny Hillis
Cc:
Jeffrey E.
Subject:
Re:
Hi Danny,=nbsp;
I appreciated your thoughts yesterday re "stories."
Three foll=w up thoughts:
1) In cases where we can't tell complete stories, like your=sorting algorithm, we can presumably tell stories about
certain features. A=d I guess this is what I was trying to claim about evolutionary theory; we c=n't hope to predict a
priori which features will show up in which taxa or w=y humans evolved, but we can explain why sex ratios are about
50:50. And in=such cases we can still distinguish between good and bad stories (the god e=planation or a group selection
explanation vs fisher).
But I guess th=s raises two questions:
2) In such domains, which kinds of stories w=ll we be able to tell and which kinds won't we? Should we be striving for
a=Darwin-like story of human culture? For a high level pseudocode-like story f=r how the mind works? Or are there
other questions we should be asking? Wha= is the level of analysis we should be doing in these domains of
research?&=bsp;
3) And in such domains, how can we distinguish good from bad stories?=This seems like a particular problem in domains,
like the social and biolog=cal science, where even the good stories are incomplete and never 100% accu=ate. But there
are still better and worse stories. Currently, as you pointe= out, these fields seem rife with bad stories. How could we
more systematic=lly distinguish the good from the bad, in such domains? Is there a conceptu=l tool or a litmus test they
might be able to apply?
Anyhow, I look f=rward to chatting again. I hope you didn't find my comments or questions of=-putting.
I didn't get to hear what your daughter does, but it sound=d like she has an interest in psychology. And in evolution. I
teach and do r=search in both those departments, and would be happy to chat with her more,=if she had an interest and
found herself by Harvard again. I appreciated he= comments as well.
-Moshe
On Dec 2, 201=, at 9:20 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote:
=br>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:20=PM jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmai=.com <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
EFTA_R1_01919853
EFTA02667936
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:15 PM moshe hoffman <hoffman.moshe@gm=il.com
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Jeff,
Is it OK for me to send Danny a follow up email? If so, might you have his e=ail address by
chance?
Happy to pass the email by you first, if you prefer.
-Moshe
Sent from my iPhone
2
EFTA_R1_01919854
EFTA02667937
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01877767
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01732180
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01827309
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02057547
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Danny Hillis ‹
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02668191
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.