Case File
efta-02668308DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02668308
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02668308
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:44 AM
To:
Erika Kellerhals
Subject:
Re:
Nov???
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:35 AM Erika Kellerhals «= href="mailto
w=ote:
Thanks John our 45 day window to appeal to the BLUA expires =n November 5, 2016 — so if you can get us a
draft next week. If yo= need any legal research from our end — please let me know. <=div>
Erika A. Kellerhalsau>
Member
<1=>
Notice: This communication ma= contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are no= the
intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communicat=on in error, please do not print, copy, re-
transmit, disseminate, or other=ise use this information. Also, please indicate to the sender that y=u have received this
e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received.,=A0 Thank you.
<1=>
Circular 230: To ensure compliance with the =equirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax
advice containe= in our communication (including any attachments) was not intended or writ=en to be used, and cannot
be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax=penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party
any =ransaction or matter addressed herein.
EFTA_R1_01920364
EFTA02668308
<=iv style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-fami=y:Calibri,sans-serif"
class="gmail_msg">
From: <=span> "John P. Woods, AIA" <
<1=»
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 4:36 PM
To: Er=ka Kellerhals «mailto
<mailto
> >
Cc: "rjeffrey E." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]», Cecile de Jongh
&I=
<mailto
», "John P. Woods" <
Subject: Re:
I would sti=l try, given the vagueness of the height restrictions and him quoting rule= and regulations that aren't
approved. We just have to restate the cas=.
JPW
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Erika Kellerhals <
> wrote:
John — Cecile, Amy & I had the discussion re=arding the flagpole at a meeting with JP and the
Commissioner and she defe=red to him on the 45' height restriction. I'm not sure tha= it would make a difference to go
back to her and ask her to reconsider. <= class="gmail_msg">
=u class="gmail_msg">
Erika A. Kellerhals<=pan style="color:black" classegmail_msg")<= class="gmail_msg">
Memberl>=A0
=ellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC</=>
St. Thomas, VI 00802
e=ail:
<mailto
> <=u>
2
EFTA_R1_01920365
EFTA02668309
Notice: This communication may=contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are
not=the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communicati=n in error, please do not print, copy, re-
transmit, disseminate, or otherw=se use this information. Also, please indicate to the sender that yo= have received this
e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received.Q=A0 Thank you.
Circular 230: To ensu=e compliance with the requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that =ny
tax advice contained in our communication (including any attachments) w=s not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose =f (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommendin= to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
=/span>
From: "John P. Woods
To: "'Jeffrey E.— <jeevacation@ mai=.com <mailto:[email protected]», Erika Kellerhals
<mailto
>, =#39;Cecile de Jongh' <
<mailto:
Subject: RE:
<= class="MsoNormal gmail_msg">
I was going to say you didn't call the Governor to set up=the meeting. He followed the issue in the
media and reached out to you. Th=t's how I understood it when we spoke on the island, but I wasn40=804ot a 100%
sure. If that is the case, it might beneficial if the Govern=r states that at the beginning of the meeting so these guys don't
=hink you are running to him every time you have a problem with them. Addit=onally, I think we maneuvered them into
stating we could ask the Commissio=er to reconsider the 45 feet height restriction on the flagpole, particula=ly since the
permit hasn't been fully executed as yet. It is clear=to me the section referenced to limit the height appears to refer to
attac=ments on a building than a freestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner c=n prevail with that. If not, go to Land
Use & Appeals.
JPW
40=AD
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of=this
3
EFTA_R1_01920366
EFTA02668310
communication or any part thereof is strictly =rohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received=this
communication in error, please notify us immed=ately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication an= all copies thereof,
including all attachments. cop=right -all rights reserved
4
EFTA_R1_01920367
EFTA02668311
Technical Artifacts (8)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Phone
2668308Phone
2668309Phone
2668310Phone
2668311Wire Ref
referencedRelated Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.