Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02668308DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02668308

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02668308
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:44 AM To: Erika Kellerhals Subject: Re: Nov??? On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:35 AM Erika Kellerhals «= href="mailto w=ote: Thanks John our 45 day window to appeal to the BLUA expires =n November 5, 2016 — so if you can get us a draft next week. If yo= need any legal research from our end — please let me know. <=div> Erika A. Kellerhalsau> Member <1=> Notice: This communication ma= contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are no= the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communicat=on in error, please do not print, copy, re- transmit, disseminate, or other=ise use this information. Also, please indicate to the sender that y=u have received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received.,=A0 Thank you. <1=> Circular 230: To ensure compliance with the =equirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice containe= in our communication (including any attachments) was not intended or writ=en to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax=penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any =ransaction or matter addressed herein. EFTA_R1_01920364 EFTA02668308 <=iv style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-fami=y:Calibri,sans-serif" class="gmail_msg"> From: <=span> "John P. Woods, AIA" < <1=» Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 4:36 PM To: Er=ka Kellerhals «mailto <mailto > > Cc: "rjeffrey E." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]», Cecile de Jongh &I= <mailto », "John P. Woods" < Subject: Re: I would sti=l try, given the vagueness of the height restrictions and him quoting rule= and regulations that aren't approved. We just have to restate the cas=. JPW Sent from my iPhone On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Erika Kellerhals < > wrote: John — Cecile, Amy & I had the discussion re=arding the flagpole at a meeting with JP and the Commissioner and she defe=red to him on the 45' height restriction. I'm not sure tha= it would make a difference to go back to her and ask her to reconsider. <= class="gmail_msg"> =u class="gmail_msg"> Erika A. Kellerhals<=pan style="color:black" classegmail_msg")<= class="gmail_msg"> Memberl>=A0 =ellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC</=> St. Thomas, VI 00802 e=ail: <mailto > <=u> 2 EFTA_R1_01920365 EFTA02668309 Notice: This communication may=contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not=the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communicati=n in error, please do not print, copy, re- transmit, disseminate, or otherw=se use this information. Also, please indicate to the sender that yo= have received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received.Q=A0 Thank you. Circular 230: To ensu=e compliance with the requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that =ny tax advice contained in our communication (including any attachments) w=s not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose =f (i) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommendin= to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. =/span> From: "John P. Woods Date: To: "'Jeffrey E.— <jeevacation@ mai=.com <mailto:[email protected]», Erika Kellerhals <mailto >, =#39;Cecile de Jongh' < <mailto: Subject: RE: <= class="MsoNormal gmail_msg"> I was going to say you didn't call the Governor to set up=the meeting. He followed the issue in the media and reached out to you. Th=t's how I understood it when we spoke on the island, but I wasn40=804ot a 100% sure. If that is the case, it might beneficial if the Govern=r states that at the beginning of the meeting so these guys don't =hink you are running to him every time you have a problem with them. Addit=onally, I think we maneuvered them into stating we could ask the Commissio=er to reconsider the 45 feet height restriction on the flagpole, particula=ly since the permit hasn't been fully executed as yet. It is clear=to me the section referenced to limit the height appears to refer to attac=ments on a building than a freestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner c=n prevail with that. If not, go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW 40=AD please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of=this 3 EFTA_R1_01920366 EFTA02668310 communication or any part thereof is strictly =rohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received=this communication in error, please notify us immed=ately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication an= all copies thereof, including all attachments. cop=right -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_01920367 EFTA02668311

Technical Artifacts (8)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2668308
Phone2668309
Phone2668310
Phone2668311
Wire Refreferenced

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.