Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02672213DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02672213

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02672213
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:25 AM To: Gordon Getty Cc: [email protected]; Alan Rogers; Robert Frank; Jeffrey Epstein Subject: degree of r and age Dear Gordon I very much like your slimmed down version of Hamilton/Fisher. Certainly collapsing the main equation by N=1 is obvious. Somewhat less so is the matter of defining a benefit (B) i.e. an increase in reproductive success, as a change in one's reproductive value, which seems like a more permanent character. In one sense yes: it has just gone up, but does the general, let us say declining in older people rule, still not apply?—and is it bumped throughout by the same benefit recently transferred ? When I explicitly set out to build a theory of the family I knew the key variables were degree of relatedness, sex and age—yet I never reached a proper synthesis with the latter. Here I would trust Alan Rogers more than myself; likewise, David Haig has contributed the following, which also references Alan: Ronald Lee has developed a model of intergenerational transfers that has some interesting properties. The problem is that his model is implicitly one of clonal asexual reproduction (r = 1 for all transfers among individuals). I am not sure whether anyone has achieved a general model for transfers among relatives which is what Gordon is working at. Lee, R. (2008) Sociality, selection, and survival: simulated evolution of mortality with intergenerational transfers and food sharing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 7124-7128. Lee, R. D. (2003) Rethinking the evolutionary theory of aging: transfers, not births, shape senescence in social species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 9637-9642. and Alan Rogers has a commentary: Rogers, A. R. (2003) Economics and the evolution of life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 9114-9115. Note absence of parent-offspring conflict. I will write you later re your very interesting piece on discounting. I am copying David on all this warmest best bob <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> EFTA_R1_01945069 EFTA02672213 <dict> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1385511914</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> <array> <integer>27</integen <integer>7</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>365897</string> </diet> </plist> 2 EFTA_R1_01945070 EFTA02672214

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2672213
Phone2672214
Phone5511914
Phone637-9642
URLhttp://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd
Wire Refreferences

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.