Case File
efta-02729603DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02729603
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02729603
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA
CASE NO:
STATE,
vs.
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E,
Defendant.
CA
2008CF009381A>a
MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
COMES NOW, Applicant, B.B. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil
Procedure 1.230, for leave to intervene as a party in Mr. Epstein's criminal matter for the
following reasons:
1.
Applicant's intervention is in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety
of the main proceeding.
2.
Applicant stands to either gain or lose by the court's direct legal operation and
effect of judgment in the pending matter.
3.
Applicant is not injecting a new issue into the pending matter.
4.
Applicant's motion to intervene is timely.
09/12/2019
Page
CONFIDENTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011
SDNY_GM_0033111192
EFTA _002046
EFTA02729603
5.
Defense counsel, Robert Critton, Jr. in the civil matter, does not object to
Applicant's motion, but Plaintiff's counsel has not heard back from Defendant
Epstein's criminal counsel, Jack Goldberger as to whether he opposes this motion.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Anyone claiming an interest in pending litigation may at any time be permitted to assert a
right by intervention, but the intervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the
propriety of the main proceeding, unless otherwise ordered by the court in its discretion.
Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230. "A person seeking leave to intervene must claim an interest of such a direct
and immediate character that the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation
and effect of the judgment." Litvak v. Scylla Properties LLC, 946 So.2d 1165, 1172 (Fla. 5ih
DCA 2006). Additionally, "an intervenor my not inject a new issue into the case."
Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida, Inc., v. IMC Phosphates, Inc., 857 So.2d
207, 211 (Fla.1° DCA 2003). "An intervention is thus only appropriate where the issue the
intervenor raises are related to the case being litigated." Racing Properties, L.P., v. Baldwin, 885
So.2d 881, 883 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004).
Once the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its
discretion to determine whether to permit intervention. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle 593
So.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1992). "In deciding this question the court should consider a number of
factors, including the derivation of the interest, any pertinent contractual language, the size of the
interest, the potential for conflicts or new issues, and any other relevant circumstance." W.
Finally, an intervention is generally considered timely if it is made before a final decree has been
entered. Sec Technical Chemicals And PSucts Inc., v. Porchester Holdings, Inc. 748 So.2d
1090, 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
09112;2019
Kir 115E
C 0
NTIAL
an
Agency to Agency Reque219-411
SDNY_GM_00331893
EFTA 00204619
EFTA02729604
Applicant's proposed intervention is subordinate and in recognition of the propriety of
the main proceeding. Additionally, Applicant will not inject any new issue into Mr. Epstein's
criminal case. In fact, Applicant's intervention is for the limited purpose of joining already
intervening parties "E.W." and "the Palm Beach Post" in their arguments regarding the sealed
Federal non-prosecution agreement in Mr. Epstein's criminal file. Finally, Applicant's interest is
of such a direct and immediate character that the Applicant stands to either gain or lose by the
court's judgment in the pending matter. The Applicant currently has a civil complaint against
Mr. Epstien regarding allegations similar to those in this pending criminal mater. The sealed
document may contain discoverable information or may lead to the discovery of new relevant
information. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(1). Additionally, the document may contain valuable
impeachment information that the Applicant would intend to use if the Applicant's civil case
proceeded to trial.
WHEREFORE, Applicant, B.B., respectfully requests the Court grant &B.'s motion to
intervene in the pending criminal matter.
09/12/2019
C 0 NirelaolE NTIAL
Agency to Agency Roque: 19.411
SDNY_GM_00331894
EFTA 00204620
EFTA02729605
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by U. S.
Mail, postage prepaid, thist day ofi
, lehtfi to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian
Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., 250 Australian
Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike,
515 North Flagla Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
09112/2019
LEOPOLD-KUVIN, PA
2925 PGA Boulevard
Suite 200
Palm Be
(561) 5
(561) 5
By:
5-1
5-
ENC
Gardens, FL
•
T. KUV1N, Esq.
Florida ar No.: 089737
C 0 grialYE NTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
4
SDNY_GM_00331 895
EFTA_00204621
EFTA02729606
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.
2008CF009381A
DIVISION W
STATE OF FLORIDA
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant
MOTION TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL
•1 r
Comes now the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned
attorney's, pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the Administrative
Orders of this Court , specifically AO 2.303 and moves this Court to treat as confidential
the following records.
A. A document referred to as "Non-Prosecution Agreement" filed under seal in the
court file on July 2, 2008.
B. A document referred to as "The Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement"
filed under seal in the court file on August 25, 2008.
1. The above referenced documents were Ordered Sealed at a hearing held before
the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008.
2. A Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records was filed
by Non-Party EW on or about May 15, 2009.
3. A Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access was filed by Non-party Palm
Beach Post on June 1, 2009.
4. This Court granted Non-Party E.W. and Palm Beach Post Motion to Intervene
on June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W.'s Motion to Vacate
Order Sealing Records and Unsealing Records or on Palm Beach Posts Petition
For Access, pending a further hearing.
9971272C 7 9
CONFIDENTIAL
T
Agency to Agency Roque: 19-411
SDNYGM_00331896
EFTA_00204622
EFTA02729607
5.. The documents should remain confidential for the following reasons:
a. To prevent a serious imminent threat to the fair, impartial, and orderly
administration of justice.
b. To protect a compelling government interest.
c.
To avoid substantial injury to innocent third parties.
d
To avoid substantial injury to a party by disclosure of matters protected
by a common law and privacy right, not generally inherent in these
specific type of proceedings, sought to be closed.
WHEREFORE, Defendant moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order keeping
the above referenced records confidential, and maintaining them under seal.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion is made in good faith and supported by a
sound and factual legal basis.
CK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ.
WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 11 day
of June, 2009.
09/12/2019
Notary Public State of Fl
r -i54-•11
My Commission Expires
Page 3875
CONFIDENTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet 19-411
SDNYGM_00331897
EFTA_00204623
EFTA02729608
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been
furnished via VU.S. Mail; /Facsimile; E Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta,
United States Attorneys Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400,
West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., State Attorney's Office-
West Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, William
J Berger, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite
1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394; Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT
ADLER, 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394; Deanna K.
Shullman, 400 North Ashley Drive, Suite 1100, P.O.Box 2602 (33601) Tampa, FL 33602,
Robert D. Critton, BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER, & COLEMAN, 515 N. Flagler Dr.
Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. this 11 day of June, 2009.
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
515 N. Flagler Dr. Suite 400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
561-842-2820
OBERT D. CRITTON, ESQ.
lorida Bar No.224162
09/12/2019
ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER &
WEISS, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
561.659-8300
CK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ
lorida Bar No. 262013
lage 3876
CONFIDENTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet 19-411
SDNY_GM_003311398
EFTA_00201624
EFTA02729609
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.