Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00026484DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00026484

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00026484
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 364 Filed 10/22/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC M: DATE FILED:10/22/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's conference, the Court will implement the following procedures for jury selection: A screening questionnaire will be administered on November 4, 5, and 12. The Clerk's Office will create a corresponding list of names and randomly assigned juror numbers. The list will be provided to counsel and the Court for use throughout jury selection. Jurors will be identified on the questionnaire and in court throughout the process by their assigned number only. Completed questionnaires will be copied and distributed to defense counsel by the U.S. Attorney's Office. After reviewing the completed questionnaires, counsel must confer in good faith and jointly submit four lists: (1) prospective jurors that both sides agree should proceed to voir dire; (2) prospective jurors that both sides agree should be excused; (3) prospective jurors that the defense, but not the Government believes should be excused; and (4) prospective jurors that the Government, but not the defense believes should be excused. 1 EFTA00026484 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 364 Filed 10/22/21 Page 2 of 3 o Lists for questionnaires completed on November 4 and 5 will be due to the Court via email by November 7. o Lists for questionnaires completed on November 12 will be due to the Court via email by November 13. o If necessary, there will be an in-person conference on November 15 at 9:30 a.m. to resolve any disputes. Voir dire will proceed on November 16-19. The Court will conduct one-on-one voir dire with each prospective juror in the presence of the parties and with public access to the proceeding. At the conference, both sides indicated the potential need for additional procedures during voir dire under certain circumstances. See Transcript at 10-11. As the Court indicated, it will consider proposed narrowly tailored measures that may be necessary during voir dire on a case-by-case basis. See id. at 12. The Court will decide in due course whether the exercise of peremptory strikes will proceed on November 19 or November 29. The Court implements these procedures taking into account the significant publicity this case has garnered, the nature of the charges, and the District's COVID-19 protocols. These procedures are carefully balanced and tailored to ensure the safety of the parties and prospective jurors in light of the continuing pandemic; to ensure juror candor, impartiality, and privacy; and to ensure the First Amendment right to public access of criminal proceedings. Also for the reasons stated on the record at yesterday's conference, the request to seal the parties' proposed questionnaire and voir dire and the Court's draft questionnaire and voir dire until after jury selection is completed is denied. Although the Court has and will continue to implement tailored measures to ensure a fair trial despite significant media interest, see Dkt. Nos. 2 EFTA00026485 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 364 Filed 10/22/21 Page 3 of 3 28, 81, 95, 99, 101, 232, 241, 284, 301, 315, the defense did not justify sealing the entirety of the proposed and draft questionnaires and voir dire. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court's planned individual voir dire process is designed to carefully probe the prior exposure to and the potential influence of any pre-trial media. As noted at the conference, the parties may continue to propose for the Court's consideration, any appropriate and tailored procedures in light of the specific factors related to this case and upcoming trial. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2021 New York, New York 3 ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge EFTA00026486

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionSep 17, 2024

Ghislaine Maxwell Appeal

22-1426-cr United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, – v. – GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF AND SPECIAL APPENDIX FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ARTHUR L. AIDALA DIANA FABI SAMSON JOHN M. LEVENTHAL AIDALA BERTUNA & KAMINS PC Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant 546 Fifth Avenue, 6th Floor New York, New Yor

113p
Dept. of JusticeApr 1, 2022

Judge Alison Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell new trial

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: Central to our system of justice is a defendant’s right to have guilt adjudged by a lay jury of one’s peers. Citizens give their time and attention to this critical role in the administration of justice, a role which is enshrined in our Constitution. Judicial officers are charged with t

40p
Court UnsealedDepositionApr 2, 2022

USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, –v– Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation: Central to our system of justice is a defendant’s right to have guilt adjudged by a lay jury of one’s peers. Citizens give their time and attention to this critical role in the administration of justice, a role which is enshrined in our Constitution. Judicial officers are charged with t

40p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00023195

0p
Court UnsealedJun 28, 2023

Delphi unsealed documents

=A i \ SE 1) = wo oe ic ER Er 5A) Te : Ea£5 FEESEm SZgE 4&Sy SE \ %87d/ ro { ¥ w ke \ A i 24 = a =i ¢ } EXHIBIT "B" eM & YY i % oH 2 Re ee Fea: soacas 221 pw Carrol Oreo Carel County, dana STATEOFINDIANA ~~) IN THE CARROLL CIRCUIT COURT Jss: COUNTY OF CARROLL) CAUSE NO. 08C01-2210-MR-000001 | staTE OF INDIANA ) ) | ws ) ) RICHARD M. ALLEN ) SUBPOENA | THE STATE OF INDIANA, TO THE SHERIFF, GREETINGS: | ‘You are hereby commanded to summon the Indiana Department of Corrections, c/o Westville C

284p
DOJ Data Set 7CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00009116

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.