Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00028060DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00028060

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00028060
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 20-2413. Document 107. 09/11/2020. 2929023, Pagel of 2 S.D.N.Y. 20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, 3. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twenty. Plaintiff:Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher, Jeffrey Epstein, Respondents, Julie Brown, Miami Herald Media Company, Alan M. Dershowitz, Michael Cemovich, DBA Cemovich Media, Intervenors. It is hereby ORDERED that the United States shall submit an amicus letter brief, not to exceed ten (10) double-spaced pages, regarding (I) arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 3:00 pm. It is also hereby ORDERED that the parties to the appeal shall respond to the letter brief filed by the United States by Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 3:00 pm. EFTA00028060 Case 20-2413. Document 107. 09/11:2020. 2929023, Page2 of 2 The hearing scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 2:00 pm is hereby ADJOURNED until further order of the court. For the Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EFTA00028061

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
Court UnsealedDepositionApr 14, 2020

Giuffre

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1049 Filed 04/14/20 Page 1 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed and approved the parties’ joint proposed redacted Decided Motions List that was submitted to the Court on April 3, 2020. (See dkt. no. 1045.) That redacted Decided Motions List is attache

91p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01681858

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01340455

0p
Court UnsealedAug 4, 2020

Giuffre v. Dershowitz 8.4.2020

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1097 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 19 Civ. 3377 (LAP) -againstALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed the parties’ update, filed in Giuffre v. Dershowitz, No. 19 Civ. 3377, on the status of their disc

6p
Court UnsealedNov 25, 2020

USVI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE Plaintiff, -against￾GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) MEMORANDUM & ORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Government of the United States Virgin Islands (the “USVI”) has moved (1) to intervene in the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and (2) should intervention be permitted, for confidential access to sealed judicial re

17p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.